Journals / IOJET / 2018 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 1

ANALYSING NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT PLANS IN TURKEY REGARDING TEACHER TRAINING AND EMPLOYMENT

Journal
IOJET
Pages
132–148
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The overall findings demonstrated that the related decisions were made with a focus on three purposes: (i) to meet teacher shortage, (ii) to reduce the number of students per teacher, and (iii) to balance the distribution of teachers nationwide.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This research is motivated to investigate five-year national development plans (NPDs) prepared in Turkey between 1963 and 2013 with regard to teacher training and employment.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The overall findings demonstrated that the related decisions were made with a focus on three purposes: (i) to meet teacher shortage, (ii) to reduce the number of students per teacher, and (iii) to balance the distribution of teachers nationwide.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The study concludes with some practical implications for decision makers on the preparation and implementation of NDPs with respect to teacher training and employment.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2013 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This research is motivated to investigate five-year national development plans (NPDs) prepared in Turkey between 1963 and 2013 with regard to teacher training and employment. The data were elicited from the plans in concern, and qualitatively analysed through content analysis. The overall findings demonstrated that the related decisions were made with a focus on three purposes: (i) to meet teacher shortage, (ii) to reduce the number of students per teacher, and (iii) to balance the distribution of teachers nationwide. The reasons why most of the decisions could not be successfully implemented might be listed as political instability, decisions taken without sufficient preparation, and inadequacy of efforts to implement NDPs. Eventhoughcertaindecisionsweretakenconsideringteacherqualificationsand competenciesintoaccount,quantitativeconcernscausedprocrastinationintheir implementation. The study concludes with some practical implications for decision makers on the preparation and implementation of NDPs with respect to teacher training and employment.

🔖

Cite This Article

AĞÇAM, R., ÜNSAL, S., KORKMAZ, F. (2022). ANALYSING NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT PLANS IN TURKEY REGARDING TEACHER TRAINING AND EMPLOYMENT. IOJET, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 1, 132–148. https://ajindex.com/articles/542386

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Akyüz, Y. (1993). Türk eğitim tarihi. İstanbul:
  2. Kültür Koleji Yayınları.
  3. Altundemir, M. E. (2012). Kalkınma planlarından eğitime bakış: Kamusal mallar teorisiperspektifinden. Bilgi Ekonomisi ve Yönetimi Dergisi, 7(1), 94-105.
  4. Budak, Ş. (2003). Atatürk’ün eğitim felsefesi ve getirdiği eğitim sisteminin değiştirilmesi. Milli Eğitim Dergisi, 160. Retrieved from http:// dhgm.meb.gov.tr/yayimlar/dergiler/milli_egitim_dergisi/160/budak.htm Caena, F.(2011a)Literature review teachers' core Competences: Requirements and development. European Commission Thematic Working Group ‘Professional Development of Teachers’ (Brussels, European Commission). Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/education/policy/strategic-framework/doc/teacher competences_en.pdf. Cansız Aktaş, M. (2015). Nitel veri toplama araçları. In M. Metin (Ed.), Kuramdan uygulamaya eğitimde bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri (pp. 337-371). Ankara: Pegem Akademi Yayıncılık. Center for Education National Research Council (2001). Educating teachers of science, mathematics, and technology.Washington: National Academy Press.
  5. Çapa, Y., & Çil, N. (2000). Öğretmen adaylarının öğretmenlik mesleğine yönelik tutumlarının farklı değişkenler açısından incelenmesi. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 18(18), 253-275.
  6. Ekiz, C., & Somel, A. (2007). Türkiye'de planlama ve planlama anlayışının değişimi. Mülkiye Dergisi, 31(256), 97-136.
  7. Ergün, M. (1987). Türkiye'de öğretmen yetiştirme çalışmalarının gelişmesi. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 2(2), 10-18.
  8. Ergün, M. (1998). Bilgi toplumunda öğretmen yetiştirme. Milli Eğitim Dergisi, 138, 25-37. European Commission DG Education and Culture (2005). Common European Principles for Teacher Competences and Qualifications.Brussels. Available at http://ec.europa.eu/education/policies/2010/doc/principles_en.pdf
  9. Ergün, M. (2011). Eğitim ve kalkınma, 3. Sosyal Bilimler Sempozyumu: BölgeselKalkınmada Eğitimin Rolü.http://www. egitim. aku.edu. tr. (Accessed on 13.06.2016).
  10. Giarellie, E., & Tulman, L. (2003). Methodological issues in the use of published cartoons as Data. Qualitative Health Research, 13, 945-956.
  11. Gönülaçar, Ş. (2014). Kalkınma planları ve eğitim. Retrieved from www.independent.academia.edu ( 01.05.2016).
  12. Gül, H. (1992). Kalkınma planlarında eğitime ilişkin sayısal hedefler ve gerçekleşme düzeyi. Unpublished MA dissertation, Institute of Social Sciences, İnönü University. Hanson, M. (2008). Economic development, education and transnational corporatio