Journals / IOJET / 2018 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 2

ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES OF SOCIOSCIENTIFIC ISSUE-BASED INSTRUCTION IN SCIENCE CLASSROOMS

Journal
IOJET
Pages
361–374
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Findings of the study show that the advantages ofsocioscientific issue based instruction in science classroom are comprised of six sub themesthat are upskilling, social awareness, development of thinking, meaningful learning, characterand professional development, contribution to scientific literacy whereas disadvantages ofthis instruction process are challenges to teachers and students, limitations of teaching andlearning process in prospective science teachers’ perspectives.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The social roles and responsibilities expected from citizens are increasing due to changingglobal living conditions.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Science education is expected to prepare conscious and sensitivestudents because today’s students are the adults of the future.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Findings of the study show that the advantages ofsocioscientific issue based instruction in science classroom are comprised of six sub themesthat are upskilling, social awareness, development of thinking, meaningful learning, characterand professional development, contribution to scientific literacy whereas disadvantages ofthis instruction process are challenges to teachers and students, limitations of teaching andlearning process in prospective science teachers’ perspectives.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The social roles and responsibilities expected from citizens are increasing due to changingglobal living conditions. Science education is expected to prepare conscious and sensitivestudents because today’s students are the adults of the future. To do so, the main pre-requisiteis quality teacher education. In the past decade, one of the most important research fields ofscience education has become socioscientific issues. The purpose of this research is toexplore advantages and disadvantages of socioscientific issue based instruction in scienceclassrooms according to prospective science teachers’ views. A qualitative single case studydesign has been utilized. Prospective science teachers’ diaries and focus group interviewswere used as data collection tools. Dolphinariums, Kyoto Protocol, genetically modifiedorganisms, recyclable black bags’ benefits and damages, genetic tests, alternative energysources and organ donation are examples of socioscientific issues, which are taught throughactivities in special teaching course. Findings of the study show that the advantages ofsocioscientific issue based instruction in science classroom are comprised of six sub themesthat are upskilling, social awareness, development of thinking, meaningful learning, characterand professional development, contribution to scientific literacy whereas disadvantages ofthis instruction process are challenges to teachers and students, limitations of teaching andlearning process in prospective science teachers’ perspectives.

🔖

Cite This Article

YAPICIOĞLU, A. E. (2022). ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES OF SOCIOSCIENTIFIC ISSUE-BASED INSTRUCTION IN SCIENCE CLASSROOMS. IOJET, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 2, 361–374. https://ajindex.com/articles/542366

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Anagün, Ş. S., & Özden, M. (2010). Teacher candidates’ perceptions regarding socioscientific issues and their competencies in using socio-scientific issues in science and technology instruction. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 9(2010), 981-985. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.12.271. Bossér, U., Lundin, M., Lindahl, M., & Linder, C. (2015). Challenges faced by teachers implementing socio-scientific issues as core elements in their classroom practices. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 3(2), 159-175.
  2. Cansız, M., & Cansız, N. (2016). Artvin citizens’ reasoning about a local environmental issue: Cerattepe. International Journal on New Trends in Education and Their Implications, 7(3), 88-93.
  3. Chikoko, V., Gilmour, V. C., Harber, C., & Serf, J. (2011). Teaching controversial issues and teacher education in England and South Africa. Journal of Education for Teaching, 37(1), 5-19.
  4. Christenson, N., Chang Rundgren, S-N., & Zeidler, D.L. (2014). The relationship of discipline background to upper secondary students’ argumentation on socioscientific issues. Research in Science Education, 44(4), 581-601. doi: 10.1007/s11165-013-9394-6
  5. Cross, R. T., & Price, R. F. (1996). Science teachers' social conscience and the role of controversial issues in the teaching of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(3), 319-333.
  6. Dawson, V., & Venville, G.J. (2009). High‐school students’ informal reasoning and argumentation about biotechnology: an indicator of scientific literacy? International Journal of Science Education, 31(11), 1421-1445. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09500690801992870.
  7. Doğanay, A., & Öztürk, A. (2017). Developing attitudes towards human rights through socioscientific issues in science courses: An action research. Multidisciplinary Journal of Educational Research, 7(3), 253-286. doi: 10.17583/remie.2017.2873 Ergin, B. (2013). Tartışma yöntemine dayalı etkinliklerin sınıf öğretmen adaylarının genetiği değiştirilmiş (gd) besinlere ilişkin risk algılarına ve eleştirel düşünme eğilimlerine etkisinin incelenmesi (Unpublished master’s thesis). Adıyaman University, Institute of Sciences, Adıyaman. Evren-Yapıcıoğlu, A. (2016a). Fen bilimleri öğretmen adaylarının sosyobilimsel durum temelli yaklaşım uygulama modellerine yönelik görüşleri. Journal of Research in Education and Teaching, 5(3), 24-34.
  8. Evren-Yapıcıoğlu, A. (2016b). Fen bilimleri öğretmen adaylarının sosyobilimsel durum temelli öğretim yakl