Journals / IOJET / 2018 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 1

COMPARING INCLUSIVE EDUCATION IN TURKEY AND ARGENTINA

Journal
IOJET
Pages
82–92
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

While inclusive education policies in Turkey focus on disabled students and students with learning difficulties,in Argentinathey focus on disadvantaged groups in order to provide educational equality.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Comparative Education is a disciplinethathelps to identify the similarities and differences between two or more education systems indifferent cultures and countries, andwhichputs forward useful suggestions about the ways to educate people (Türkoğlu, 1985).
📊
Key Findings & Data:Ever sincetheSalamanca Statement (UNESCO, 1994), inclusive education has taken considerable steps globally.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:While inclusive education policies in Turkey focus on disabled students and students with learning difficulties,in Argentinathey focus on disadvantaged groups in order to provide educational equality.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Comparative Education is a disciplinethathelps to identify the similarities and differences between two or more education systems indifferent cultures and countries, andwhichputs forward useful suggestions about the ways to educate people (Türkoğlu, 1985). Ever sincetheSalamanca Statement (UNESCO, 1994), inclusive education has taken considerable steps globally. In this sense, governmentshave takenaction to apply educational policiesin orderto eliminate students’ disadvantagesarising from gender, disability, culture, ethnicity, socioeconomic background,etc. The purpose of this paper is to compare inclusive education inTurkeyandArgentinautilizingBereday's(1964)comparativeeducationmodel. Comparing inclusive education in Turkey and Argentina not only contributes to a better understanding ofthe inclusive education implicationsin these two developing countries,butitalsohelps in definingproblems and proposingsolutions. While inclusive education policies in Turkey focus on disabled students and students with learning difficulties,in Argentinathey focus on disadvantaged groups in order to provide educational equality.

🔖

Cite This Article

HOŞGÖRÜR, V., KAHYA, O. (2022). COMPARING INCLUSIVE EDUCATION IN TURKEY AND ARGENTINA. IOJET, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 1, 82–92. https://ajindex.com/articles/542364

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Ainscow, M. (1999). Understanding the development of inclusive schools. Philadelphia: Falmer Press.
  2. Armstrong, D., Armstrong, A. C., &Spandagou, I. (2011). Inclusion: By choice or by chance? International Journal of Inclusive Education, 15(1), 29–39.
  3. Auguste, S., Echart, M., & Francheeti, F. (2008). The quality of education in Argentina. Inter American Development Bank, (January), 1–149. Retrieved from http://www.iadb.org/res/laresnetwork/files/pr294finaldraft.pdf
  4. Bereday, G. (1964). Comparative method in education. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston Inc. Cakiroglu, O., & Melekoglu, M. A. (2014). Statistical trends and developments within inclusive education in Turkey. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 18(8), 798–808. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2013.836573Devlet
  5. Planlama Teşkilatı. (2016). Dokuzuncu kalkınma planı (2007-2013).
  6. Dış Ekonomik İlişkiler Kurulu. (2014). Arjantin ülke raporu.Eğitim Reformu Girişimi. (2011). Kaynaştırma/Bütünleştirme yoluyla eğitimde dünyadan ve Türkiye’den iyi örnekler. Erkilic, M., & Durak, S. (2013). Tolerable and inclusive learning spaces: An evaluation of policies and specifications for physical environments that promote inclusion in Turkish Primary Schools. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 3116(August 2017). https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2012.685333
  7. Gorostiaga, J. M., & Ferreira, A. (2012). Discourses andpolicies on educational quality in Argentina, 1990-2010. Research in Comparative and International Education, 7(3), 364–375. https://doi.org/10.2304/rcie.2012.7.3.364
  8. Hayashi, M. (2014). Comparative policy analysis on the impact of inclusive education in Asia and Africa: Focusing on the right to education for children with disabilities in Cambodia. Journal of International Cooperation in Education, 16(2), 21–42.
  9. IBE-UNESCO. (2007). International workshop on inclusive education, Andean and Southern Cone regions; IBE-UNESCO preparatory report for the 48th ICE on inclusive education. Buenos Aires. Kargın, T. (2004). Kaynaştırma: Tanımı, gelişimi, ilkeleri. Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Özel Eğitim Dergisi, 5(2), 1–13.
  10. MEB. (2006). Özel eğitim hizmetleri yöntemeliği. Ankara.
  11. MEB. (2010). İlköğretim okullarındaki kaynaştırma uygulamalarının değerlendirilmesi. Ankara.
  12. MEB. (2013). Çocuk gelişimi ve eğitimi: Kaynaştırma eğitimi. Ankara.
  13. MEB. (2016). Milli Eğitim istatistikleri: Örgün eğitim. Ankara.
  14. Mitchell, D. (2005). Contextualizing inclusive education: Evalu