Journals / IOJET / 2018 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 2

THE EFFECTS OF CLICKER-AIDED FLIPPED CLASSROOM MODEL ON LEARNING ACHIEVEMENT, PHYSICS ANXIETY AND STUDENTS’ PERCEPTIONS

Journal
IOJET
Pages
334–346
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results showed that, in comparison to thecontrol group students, the learning achievement of the experimental group students hadincreased and that their anxiety had decreased significantly.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Similar to all stages of education, the use of the flipped classroom model continues tobecome more widespread in higher education.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This paper aimed to provide insights from apre-test and post-test experimental design-based exploration of the effects of clicker-aidedflipped classroom model on learning achievement, Physics anxiety and students’ perceptions.The study was conducted with the participation of 61 undergraduate students taking thePhysics course.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results showed that, in comparison to thecontrol group students, the learning achievement of the experimental group students hadincreased and that their anxiety had decreased significantly.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Similar to all stages of education, the use of the flipped classroom model continues tobecome more widespread in higher education. This paper aimed to provide insights from apre-test and post-test experimental design-based exploration of the effects of clicker-aidedflipped classroom model on learning achievement, Physics anxiety and students’ perceptions.The study was conducted with the participation of 61 undergraduate students taking thePhysics course. In the in-class component of the flipped classroom model, while the studentresponse system was used with the experimental group, it was excluded during the studyconducted on the control group students. The data were collected through Physicsachievement test, Physics anxiety questionnaire, and semi-structured interviews, and requiredstatistical analyses were performed: for quantitative data analysis, SPSS was applied whereasfor qualitative data analysis, content analysis was performed. The gathered data wereanalyzed in accordance with whether the student response system was utilized in the in-classcomponent of the flipped classroom model. The results showed that, in comparison to thecontrol group students, the learning achievement of the experimental group students hadincreased and that their anxiety had decreased significantly. Furthermore, it was determinedthat the experimental group students had a positive perceptions of student response system’sutilization in class. This study may provide aid for lecturers in integrating the studentresponse system to the flipped classroom model.

🔖

Cite This Article

AŞIKSOY, G., SORAKIN, Y. (2022). THE EFFECTS OF CLICKER-AIDED FLIPPED CLASSROOM MODEL ON LEARNING ACHIEVEMENT, PHYSICS ANXIETY AND STUDENTS’ PERCEPTIONS. IOJET, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 2, 334–346. https://ajindex.com/articles/542362

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Ally, M. (2013). Mobile learning: From research to practice to impact education. Learning and Teaching in Higher Education: Gulf Perspectives, 10(2), 1-10.
  2. Batchelor, J. (2015). Effects of clicker use on calculus students’ mathematics anxiety. PRIMUS, 25(5), 453-472.
  3. Beatty, I. D., Gerace, W. J., Leonar, W. J., & Dufresne, R. J. (2006). Designing effective questions for classroom response system teaching. Am. J. Phys. 74(1), 31–39.
  4. Bergmann, J., & Sams, A. (2014). Flipping for mastery. Educational Leadership, 71(4), 24- 29. Blasco-Arcas, L., Buil, I., Hernández-Ortega, B., & Sese, F. J. (2013). Using clickers in class. The role of interactivity, active collaborative learning and engagement in learning performance. Computers & Education, 62, 102-110.
  5. Büyüköztürk, Ş., Çakmak, E.K., Akgün, Ö.E., Karadeniz, Ş. & Demirel, F., (2008). Scientific research methods. Ankara: Pegem Academy (in Turkish). Chien, Y. T., Chang, Y. H., & Chang, C. Y. (2016). Do we click in the right way? A metaanalytic review of clicker-integrated instruction. Educational Research Review, 17, 1– 18. Çoruk, H. & Çakır, R. (2017). The Effect of Multimedia Usage on Academic Achievement and Anxiety of Primary School Students. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education, 8(1), 1-27.
  6. Crossgrove, K., & Curran, K. L. (2008). Using clickers in nonmajors- and majors- level biology courses: Student opinion, learning, and long-term retention of course material. Cbe-Life Sciences Education, 7 (1), 146-154.
  7. Cubric, M., & Jefferies, A. (2015). The benefits and challenges of large-scale deployment of electronic voting systems: University student views from across different subject groups. Computers & Education, 87, 98-111.
  8. DeBourgh, G. A. (2008). Use of classroom “clickers” to promote acquisition of advanced reasoning skills. Nurse Education in Practice, 8(2), 76-87.
  9. Fautch, J. M. (2015). The flipped classroom for teaching organic chemistry in small classes: is it effective? Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 16(1), 179-186.
  10. Gilbert, A. (2005). New for back-to-school: ‘Clickers’. Retrieved on June 20th, 2011, from http://news.cnet.com/New-for-back-to-school-clickers/2100-1041_3-5819171.html.
  11. Holland, L., Schwartz-Shea, P., & Yim, J. M. J. (2013). Adapting clicker technology to diversity courses: New research insights. Journal of Political Science Education, 9(3), 273-291.
  12. Hung, H. T. (2017). Clickers in the flipped classroom: bring your own device (BYOD) to promote student learning. In