Journals / IOJET / 2019 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 4

VIEWPOINTS AND SELF-EFFICACY OF TEACHERS PARTICIPATED IN PROJECT TRAINING TOWARDS PROJECT-BASED LEARNING

Journal
IOJET
Pages
1037–1056
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

However, it was found that the views of teachers such as “mydeficiencies were completed” and “my self-confidence / motivation increased” were formedas a result of the training.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This research focuses on how teachers’ self-efficacy changes as a result of a projectconsultancy training and their views on project-based learning.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The study group of theresearch consists of 47 teachers working in Ministry of National Education who participatedin “2237 coded Project Consultancy Trainer Training” program organized in 2019 incooperation with The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK)and Ministry of Education.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:However, it was found that the views of teachers such as “mydeficiencies were completed” and “my self-confidence / motivation increased” were formedas a result of the training.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2019 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This research focuses on how teachers’ self-efficacy changes as a result of a projectconsultancy training and their views on project-based learning. The study group of theresearch consists of 47 teachers working in Ministry of National Education who participatedin “2237 coded Project Consultancy Trainer Training” program organized in 2019 incooperation with The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK)and Ministry of Education. In this research, mixed method was used in which qualitative andquantitative data were used together. In the quantitative stage of the research a semiexperimentaldesign without a control group; in the qualitative stage, a case study wasadopted. As the data collection tool, “Self-efficacy scale related to project based teaching”developed by Mutlu and Yildiz Fidan (2018) and “Teacher view form related to project basedteaching” developed by the researchers were used. As a result of the study, it was concludedthat there was a statistically significant increase between the pre-test and post-test scores. Inaddition, it was determined that there was no significant difference according to the variablesof gender, branch and making project status. From the teachers' views on project-basedteaching, the most difficult stage of the project was “finding a project subject”; and it wasunderstood that “writing reports” was the stage that they thought they could easily do whilethey were doing the project. However, it was found that the views of teachers such as “mydeficiencies were completed” and “my self-confidence / motivation increased” were formedas a result of the training.

🔖

Cite This Article

UZEL, N., MİRİCİ, S. (2022). VIEWPOINTS AND SELF-EFFICACY OF TEACHERS PARTICIPATED IN PROJECT TRAINING TOWARDS PROJECT-BASED LEARNING. IOJET, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 4, 1037–1056. https://ajindex.com/articles/542355

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Akbaş, Y., Aydın, M. (2019). Sosyal bilgiler öğretmen adaylarının proje tabanlı öğrenme (PTÖ) algılarının incelenmesi. YYÜ Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 16(1), 678-693.
  2. Aksela, M., Haatainen, O. (2018). Project-based learning (PBL) in practice: Active teachers’ views of its’ advantages and challenges. 5th International STEM in Education Conference Proceedings: Integrated Education for the Real World, At Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia, 21st to 23rd November 2018.
  3. Allen, J. M., Wright, S. E. (2014). Integrating theory and practice in the pre-service teacher education practicum. Teachers and Teaching, 20(2), 136-151.
  4. Asilsoy, Ö. (2007). Biyoloji öğretmenleri için proje tabanlı öğrenme yaklaşımı konulu bir hizmet içi eğitim kurs programı geliştirilmesi ve etkililiğinin araştırılması (Yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi). Karadeniz Teknik Üniversitesi,
  5. Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Trabzon. Ay, Ş. (2013). Öğretmen adaylarının proje tabanlı öğrenme ve geleneksel öğretime ilişkin görüşleri. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 28(1), 53-67.
  6. Aydın, M., Bacanak, A., Çepni, S. (2013). Fen ve teknoloji öğretmenlerinin proje tabanlı öğretim yöntemi (PTÖY) ile ilgili ihtiyaçlarının incelenmesi. Necatibey Eğitim Fakültesi Elektronik Fen ve Matematik Eğitimi Dergisi, 7(1), 1-31.
  7. Aydın, S., Yel, M. (2013). Proje tabanlı öğrenme ortamlarının biyoloji öğretmen adaylarının öz-düzenleme seviyeleri ve öz-yeterlik inançları üzerine etkisi. Turkish Studies, 8(12), 95-107.
  8. Bandura, A. (1994). Self-efficacy. In V. S. Ramachaudran (Eds.), Encyclopedia of human behavior (Vol. 4, pp. 71-81). New York: Academic Press.
  9. Bell, S. (2010). Project-based learning for the 21st century: Skills for the future. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 83(2), 39-43.
  10. Blumenfeld, P. C., Soloway, E., Marx, R. W., Krajcik, J. S., Guzdial, M., Palincsar, A. (1991). Motivating project-based learning: Sustaining the doing, supporting the learning. Educational psychologist, 26(3-4), 369-398.
  11. Creswell, J. W. (2013). Nitel araştırma yöntemleri (M. Bütün ve S. B. Demir, Çev. Ed.). Ankara:
  12. Siyasal Kitabevi.
  13. Creswell, J. W., Plano Clark, V. L. (2015). Karma yöntem araştırmaları: Tasarımı ve yürütülmesi (Y. Dede ve S. B. Demir, Çev. Ed.). Ankara: Anı Yayıncılık, 354s. Çakan, S. (2005). Proje tabanlı öğrenme yaklaşımının uygulandığı 6. sınıf matematik dersine ilişkin öğrenci ve öğretmen görüşleri (Bir eylem araştırması). Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Te