Journals / IOJET / 2019 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 3

DETERMINING REFLECTIVITY LEVELS OF PROSPECTIVE TEACHERS THROUGH BLOGS

Journal
IOJET
Pages
582–596
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It was concluded that the lowest reflection level emergedwith regard to the use of textual evidence and historical context criteria and that lessreflective blogs were, in almost all criteria, with respect to the overall evaluation of thecourse (Theme-5).

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, it was aimed to determine the reflective thinking levels of prospectiveteachers and the change of their reflectivity levels within the teaching practicum process.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The study wascarried out with 37 prospective teachers, attending Teaching Practicum in the Department ofComputer Education and Instructional Technology (CEIT) of a state university in Ankara,Turkey.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It was concluded that the lowest reflection level emergedwith regard to the use of textual evidence and historical context criteria and that lessreflective blogs were, in almost all criteria, with respect to the overall evaluation of thecourse (Theme-5).
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In this study, it was aimed to determine the reflective thinking levels of prospectiveteachers and the change of their reflectivity levels within the teaching practicum process. Forthis purpose, the blog postings, which written by the prospective teachers at different themes,were analyzed. Within the scope of the study, reflective thinking levels were discussed basedon the six different criteria with the following titles: Attending to feeling, sharing personalexperience, analysis and meaning-making, depth of reflection, language use and writingquality, use of textual evidence and historical context, and transfer of knowledge. In thisstudy, the document analysis method was used as a data collection technique. The study wascarried out with 37 prospective teachers, attending Teaching Practicum in the Department ofComputer Education and Instructional Technology (CEIT) of a state university in Ankara,Turkey. Prospective teachers wrote about their teaching experiences throughout teachingpracticum on their blogs. Blogs were evaluated with the help of the reflection level rubric,which prepared by the researchers. It was concluded that the lowest reflection level emergedwith regard to the use of textual evidence and historical context criteria and that lessreflective blogs were, in almost all criteria, with respect to the overall evaluation of thecourse (Theme-5). In the last section, further results and related recommendations arementioned.

🔖

Cite This Article

akko, B., telli, E., dağhan, G., menzi, N. (2022). DETERMINING REFLECTIVITY LEVELS OF PROSPECTIVE TEACHERS THROUGH BLOGS. IOJET, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 3, 582–596. https://ajindex.com/articles/542352

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Andersen, L., & Matkins, J. J. (2011). Web 2.0 tools and the reflections of preservice secondary science teachers. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 28(1), 27-38.
  2. Burton, D. (1999), Using rubrics to assess journal entries, VCU Teaching. Retrieved October 07, 2017, from http://www.tnstate.edu/servicelearning/documents/reflectionrubric-1.pdf
  3. Choy, S. C., & Oo, P. S. (2012). Reflective thinking and teaching practices: A precursor for incorporating critical thinking into the classroom? International Journal of Instruction, 5(1), 167-182.
  4. Collin, S., & Karsenti, T. (2011). The collective dimension of reflective practice: The how and why. Reflective Practice: International and Multidisciplinary Perspectives, 12(4), ‐569-581.
  5. Cook Sather, A. (2017). Virtual forms, actual effects: How amplifying student voice through digital media promotes reflective practice and positions students as pedagogical partners to prospective high school and practicing college teachers. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(5), 1143-1152.
  6. Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage Publications. Deng, L., & Yuen, H. K. (2011). Understanding student perceptions and motivation towards academic blogs: An exploratory study. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 28(1), 48-66.
  7. Dyment, J. E., & O’Connell, T. S. (2011). Assessing the quality of reflection in student journals: A review of the research. Teaching in Higher Education, 16(1), 81–97.
  8. Ekiz, D. (2006). Kendini ve başkalarını izleme: Sınıf öğretmeni adaylarının yansıtıcı günlükleri. İlköğretim Online, 5(1), 45-57.
  9. Foong, L.Y.Y., Nor, M.B.M., & Nolan, A., (2018). The influence of practicum supervisors’ facilitation styles on student teachers’ reflective thinking during collective reflection. Reflective Practice, DOI: 10.1080/14623943.2018.1437406 Gür, H. (2008). Öğretmen eğitiminde yansıtıcı düşünme. Aday öğretmenler için okul deneyimi ve öğretmenlik uygulaması. Ed: İ. H. Demircioğlu. Ankara:
  10. Anı Yayıncılık. Hall, L. A. (2017). Using blogs to support reflection in teacher education. Literacy Research and Instruction, 1-18. Hernández-Ramos, P. (2004). Web logs and online discussions as tools to promote reflective practice. The Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 3(1). Retrieved October 07, 2017, from http://www.ncolr.org/jiol/issues/PDF/3.1.4.pdf
  11. Jacklinga, B., Natolia, R., Siddiquea, S., & Sciullia, N. (2014). Student attitudes to blogs: A cas