Journals / IOJET / 2019 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 3

RECAST SEEN THROUGH MULTIPLE INTELLIGENCES’ LENS

Journal
IOJET
Pages
443–454
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results indicated that musical, visual, and verbal intelligencesignificantly predicted whether recasts will be perceived by students as corrective feedback.Therefore, it was concluded that it is essential to build MI into the picture when evaluating theefficacy of recasts on the grounds that students with certain dominant intelligence benefit fromsubtle clues which in turn help them notice recasts.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:There has been a host of research on recast so far, despite which it is still controversial if itis any effective.
📊
Key Findings & Data:To fulfill this, 121 preintermediateEFL learners in 9 different classes were selected using convenience sampling.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results indicated that musical, visual, and verbal intelligencesignificantly predicted whether recasts will be perceived by students as corrective feedback.Therefore, it was concluded that it is essential to build MI into the picture when evaluating theefficacy of recasts on the grounds that students with certain dominant intelligence benefit fromsubtle clues which in turn help them notice recasts.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

There has been a host of research on recast so far, despite which it is still controversial if itis any effective. The main argument against recasts is that they often go unnoticed by studentsdue to their implicit nature. It is hypothesized in the light of the theory of Multiple Intelligences(MI) that certain intelligences might affect the noticeability of recasts. Therefore, this paperaimed to find if certain intelligence help learners notice recasts. To fulfill this, 121 preintermediateEFL learners in 9 different classes were selected using convenience sampling. Aquestionnaire was used to measure their MI. Moreover, they were observed for 104 hours forthe occurrence of recast and uptake using a checklist. For data analysis, multiple regressionwas used to find out if any components of MI were significant predictors of recasts' success inleading to uptake. The results indicated that musical, visual, and verbal intelligencesignificantly predicted whether recasts will be perceived by students as corrective feedback.Therefore, it was concluded that it is essential to build MI into the picture when evaluating theefficacy of recasts on the grounds that students with certain dominant intelligence benefit fromsubtle clues which in turn help them notice recasts.

🔖

Cite This Article

HAJİKHANİ, F., ABEDİ, H. (2022). RECAST SEEN THROUGH MULTIPLE INTELLIGENCES’ LENS. IOJET, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 3, 443–454. https://ajindex.com/articles/542339

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Armstrong, T. (1994). Multiple intelligences in the classroom. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. Baş, G. & Beyhan, Ö. (2010). Effects of multiple intelligences supported project-based learning on students’ achievement levels and attitudes towards English lesson. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 2(3), 365-386. Biedroń, A., & Pawlak, M. (2016). The interface between research on individual difference variables and teaching practice: The case of cognitive factors and personality. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 6(3), 395-422.
  2. Blythe, T., & Gardner, H. (1990). A school for all intelligences. Educational Leadership, 47, 33-37.
  3. Campbell, B. (1991). Multiple intelligences in the classroom. Context Quarterly, 27, 12-15.
  4. Carroll, S. (1997). The irrelevance of verbal feedback to language learning. In L. Eubank, L. Selinker, & M. Sharwood Smith (Eds.), The current state of interlanguage (pp. 73–88). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Chan, D. W. (2000). Learning and teaching through the multiple intelligences perspective: Implications for curriculum reform in Hong Kong. Educational Research Journal, 15, 187–201.
  5. Chau, M. Y. (2006). Connecting learning styles and multiple intelligences theories through learning strategies: an online tutorial for library instruction. LIBRES, 16, 1-14.
  6. Fonseca-Mora, M. C., Toscano-Fuentes, C., & Wermke, K. (2011). Melodies that help: The relation between language aptitude and musical intelligence. Anglistik International Journal of English Studies, 22(1), 101-118.
  7. Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. New York: Basic Books. Gardner, H. (2004). Audiences for the theory of multiple intelligences. Teachers College Record, 106(1), 212. Gardner, H., & Hatch, T. (1989). Multiple intelligences go to school: Educational implications of the theory of multiple intelligences. Educational Researcher, 18, 4-10.
  8. Goo, J. & Mackey, A. (2013). The case against the case against recasts. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 35, 127–165.
  9. Gouws, F. E. (2007). Teaching and learning through multiple intelligences in the outcomesbased education classroom. Africa Education Review, 4(2), 60-74, DOI: 10.1080/18146620701652705 Gunter, T. C. & Friederici, A. D. (2001). Processing Syntactic Relations in language and Music: An Event-Related Potential Study. The Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 10, 717-733.
  10. Harmer, J. (2001). The practice of English languag