Journals / IOJET / 2019 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 4

THE PERCEPTION OF SCIENCE TEACHERS ON SOCIOSCIENTIFIC ISSUES AND TEACHING THEM

Journal
IOJET
Pages
960–982
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Teachers who stated that they mostly use the directinstruction, case study and discussion methods in the teaching of SSI in science courseemphasised that the SSI teaching process makes positive contributions to the development ofstudent skills like critical thinking, decision making and communication.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The present research aimed to analyse the perception of science teachers on socioscientificissues and teaching them.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The study group of the research consists of 22 scienceteachers (14 females, 8 males) working in 7 secondary schools in Sinop, who weredetermined according to the convenience sampling method.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Teachers who stated that they mostly use the directinstruction, case study and discussion methods in the teaching of SSI in science courseemphasised that the SSI teaching process makes positive contributions to the development ofstudent skills like critical thinking, decision making and communication.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The present research aimed to analyse the perception of science teachers on socioscientificissues and teaching them. The study group of the research consists of 22 scienceteachers (14 females, 8 males) working in 7 secondary schools in Sinop, who weredetermined according to the convenience sampling method. The case study as one of thequalitative research designs was adopted. The data source of the research consists of aquestionnaire on teaching socio-scientific issues. The data of the research were obtainedthrough focus group discussions and observation notes. The data obtained from the researchwere analysed according to the content analysis technique. As a result of the research, it wasfound out that most of the science teachers had not heard of the concept of SSI (socioscientificissues) before. It was seen that teachers who did not have knowledge about SSIgenerally defined it as scientific issues that concern society and had difficulty in givingexamples. It was determined that most of the teachers did not know to which learning area inthe science curriculum SSI belonged. Teachers who stated that they mostly use the directinstruction, case study and discussion methods in the teaching of SSI in science courseemphasised that the SSI teaching process makes positive contributions to the development ofstudent skills like critical thinking, decision making and communication.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZTÜRK, N., ERABDAN, H. (2022). THE PERCEPTION OF SCIENCE TEACHERS ON SOCIOSCIENTIFIC ISSUES AND TEACHING THEM. IOJET, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 4, 960–982. https://ajindex.com/articles/542324

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Bybee, R.W. (1997). Achieving science literacy: From purposes to practices. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann. Chang, S. N., & Chiu, M. H. (2008). Lakatos scientific research programmes as a framework for analysing informal argumentation about socioscientific issues. International Journal of Science Education, 30(13), 1753-1773.
  2. Chang, S. N., Yeung, Y. Y., & Cheng, M. H. (2009). Ninth graders’ learning interests, life experiences and attitudes towards science & technology. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 18(5), 447-457.
  3. Chang Rundgren, S. N., & Rundgren, C. J. (2010). From a separate to a holistic view of socioscientific issues. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 11(1), 1- 24. DeBoer, G. E. (2000). Scientific literacy: Another look at its historical and contemporary meanings and its relationship to science education reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(6), 582-601.
  4. Driver, R., Newton, P., & Osborne, J. (2000). Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms. Science Education, 84, 287-312.
  5. Evren, A., & Kaptan, F. (2014). Fen eğitiminde sosyobilimsel durum temelli öğretim ve önemi. VI. Uluslararası Eğitim Araştırmaları Kongresi, 389-402,
  6. Ankara.
  7. Han Tosunoğlu, Ç., & İrez, S. (2017). Biyoloji öğretmenlerinin sosyobilimsel konularla ile ilgili anlayışları. Uludağ Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 30(2), 833-860.
  8. Han Tosunoğlu, Ç. (2018). Biyoloji öğretmenlerinin sosyobilimsel konularla ilgilipedagojik alan bilgilerinin incelenmesi (Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi). Marmara Üniversitesi,
  9. İstanbul.
  10. Hughes, G. (2000). Marginalization of socioscientific material in science–technology– society science curricula: Some implications for gender inclusivity and curriculum reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(5), 426-440.
  11. Hurd, P. D. (1958). Science literacy: Its meaning for American schools. Educational Leadership, 16, 13-16.
  12. Hurd, P. D. (1998). Scientific literacy: New minds for a changing world. Science Education, 82, 407-416.
  13. Goodrum, D., Hackling, M., & Rennie, L. (2001). The status and quality of teaching and learning of science in Australian schools. Canberra: Department of Education, Training and Youth Affairs. Kilinc, A., Boyes, E., & Stanisstreet, M. (2013). Exploring students’ ideas about risks and benefits of nuclear powerusing risk perception theories. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 22(3), 252-266. Kolstø, S. D. (2001). To trust or not to trust pupils ways of judging informa