Journals / IOJET / 2019 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 3

THE EVALUATION OF LANGUAGE TEACHING PROGRAM APPLIED IN THE SCHOOL OF FOREIGN LANGUAGES

Journal
IOJET
Pages
658–670
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It would give some clues to the administration to understand the effectiveness of theProgram.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:English language teaching is one of the most crucial issues in the field of education in theworld as well as in Turkey.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This study focused on the evaluation of the effectiveness of language teachingprogram applied in the preparatory classes by the school of Foreign Languages of a stateuniversity in Turkey through the perspectives of the students studying English for a year. 270students attending the preparatory school participated in the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It would give some clues to the administration to understand the effectiveness of theProgram.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

English language teaching is one of the most crucial issues in the field of education in theworld as well as in Turkey. There has been a growing need for adequate English languageeducation programs at schools in Turkey. Preparatory classes of the School of ForeignLanguages which offers students a full one year of English education try to fulfil this needregarding the students’ needs and wishes into consideration in order to teach Englishsuccessfully. This study focused on the evaluation of the effectiveness of language teachingprogram applied in the preparatory classes by the school of Foreign Languages of a stateuniversity in Turkey through the perspectives of the students studying English for a year. 270students attending the preparatory school participated in the study. The data were gatheredthrough a self-reported student questionnaire and were analyzed descriptively through SPSS20. The results of the study demonstrated that the language teaching program in thepreparatory classes of the School served for its purpose not fully but partially. The findings ofthe study indicated significant implications in relation to the strengths and weaknesses of theprogram. It would give some clues to the administration to understand the effectiveness of theProgram.

🔖

Cite This Article

GENÇ, G., KULUŞAKLI, E. (2022). THE EVALUATION OF LANGUAGE TEACHING PROGRAM APPLIED IN THE SCHOOL OF FOREIGN LANGUAGES. IOJET, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 3, 658–670. https://ajindex.com/articles/542322

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Akpur, U., Alcı, B. & Karataş,H. (2016). Evaluation of the curriculum of English preparatory classes at Yildiz Technical University using CIPP model. Academic Journals, 11,7, pp. 466-473.
  2. Coşkun, A. (2012). An investigation of the effectiveness of the modular general English language teaching preparatory program at a Turkish university. South African Journal of Education. 33. 10.15700/201503070754. Cronbach, L. J. (1991). Course improvement through evaluation. In G.F. Madaus, M.S. Doğançay- Aktuna, S. (1998). The spread of English in Turkey and its current sociolinguistic profile. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 19, 23- 39. Fitz-Gibbon, C.T. & Morris, L.L. (1987). How to design a program evaluation. LA: Sage Publications, Inc. Kelly, A. (2004). The Curriculum: theory and practice. Sage Publications, London, fifth edition. König, G. (1990). The Birth and growth of a department: Department of English language and literature: 25th Anniversary, Deniz Bozer (ed.). 157-67.
  3. Ankara,
  4. University. Mede, E. and Uygun, S. (2014). Evaluation of a language preparatory program: A case study. ELT Research Journal, 3 (4), 201-221.
  5. McNeil, John D. (1985). Curriculum: A Comprehensive introduction. Boston: Little, Brown and Co. Ornstein, A.C., & Hunkins F.P. (1998). Curriculum: foundations, principles and issues. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon. Öner, G. & Mede, E. (2015). Evaluation of A1 level program at an English preparatory school in a Turkish university: a case study. ELT Research Journal, 4(3), 204-226.
  6. Özüdoğru F. (2017). Evaluation of the voluntary English preparatory program at a Turkish state university. Journal of International Social Research. Feb2017, Vol. 10 Issue 48, pp. 501-509.
  7. Payne, D. (1994). Designing Educational Project and Program Evaluations. Boston, MA: Kluwer. Tekin, M. (2015). Evaluation of a preparatory school program at a public university in Turkey. The Journal of International Social Research, 8(36), 718-733.
  8. Tercan, G. (2018). Evaluating the modular system of preparatory class program. ELT Research Journal, 7 (1), 2-23.
  9. Toker, O. (1999). The attitudes of teaching staff and students towards the preparatory curriculum of the department of foreign languages in the University of Gaziantep (Unpublished master’s thesis). University of Gaziantep, Gaziantep. Tunç, F. (2010). Evaluation of an English Language Teaching Program at a Public University Using CIPP model. Unpublished Masters’ dissertation. Ankara: Middle East Tec