SavedAdd your journal

Journals / IOJET / 2019 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 4

THE CASE FOR EXAMINATION OF DIFFERENT METHODS USED IN LIFE SCIENCES AND SOCIAL STUDIES COURSES

Nur ÜTKÜR
Journal
IOJET
Pages
866–877
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

These types of activities includeimpersonations, activities which involve examples from everyday life and activities based onhuman relations.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study aimed to identify preservice gifted education teachers’ opinions on theinstruction of life sciences and social studies courses and examine the activities, theydeveloped regarding the several methods and techniques related to the courses.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this study,which has qualitative research features, an open-ended questionnaire was used as a datacollection tool.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:These types of activities includeimpersonations, activities which involve examples from everyday life and activities based onhuman relations.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In this study aimed to identify preservice gifted education teachers’ opinions on theinstruction of life sciences and social studies courses and examine the activities, theydeveloped regarding the several methods and techniques related to the courses. In this study,which has qualitative research features, an open-ended questionnaire was used as a datacollection tool. It has been determined that the majority of preservice teachers prefer to usethe constructivist approach in life sciences and social studies courses in terms of the obtaineddata. In addition, preservice teachers have stated drama, case study, and empathy among themethods and techniques that can be used in life sciences and social studies courses. It hasbeen determined that preservice teachers also state various types of activities that can be usedin the classroom for these methods and techniques. These types of activities includeimpersonations, activities which involve examples from everyday life and activities based onhuman relations.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÜTKÜR, N. (2022). THE CASE FOR EXAMINATION OF DIFFERENT METHODS USED IN LIFE SCIENCES AND SOCIAL STUDIES COURSES. IOJET, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 4, 866–877. https://ajindex.com/articles/542321

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Aksu, H. H. (2008). Prospective teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs regarding mathematics teaching. Abant Izzet Baysal University Education Faculty Journal, 8(2), 161-170.
  2. Creswell, J. W. (2015). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches. M. Bütün & S. B. Demir (Trans. Eds.). Ankara:
  3. Siyasal Bookstore. Gültekin, M. & Gündoğan-Çögeldi, A. (2014). Sınıf öğretmeni adaylarının hayat bilgisi dersine yönelik metaforik algıları. Cukurova University Education Faculty Journal, 43(1), 1-18.
  4. Güven, B. & Ersoy, E. (2007). The self-efficacy perceptions and cognitive attitudes of preservice teachers about social science and social studies teaching 1 course. Pamukkale University Education Faculty Journal, 21(21), 15-32.
  5. Kılınç, E. & Uygun, M. (2015). Examining the correlation between pre-service primary school teachers’ perception of self-efficacy toward life study teaching and their metacognitive awareness. Mustafa Kemal University Journal of Graduate School of Social Sciences, 12(29), 1-15.
  6. Kurtdede-Fidan, N. (2009). Opinions of the candidate teachers about value education. Journal of Theoretical Educational Science, 2(2), 1-18.
  7. Mertol, H., Doğdu, M. & Yılar, B. (2013). Metaphorical perceptions of the gifted and talented students with regard to the social studies lesson. Journal of Gifted Education Research, 1(3),176-183.
  8. Miles, M. B. & Huberman, A. M. (1994). An expanded sourcebook qualitative data analysis. London: Sage Publications. Ministry of National Education, (2018). Life studies course curriculum: 1st, 2nd and 3rd grades. Ankara,
  9. Turkey. Murat, M., Aslantaş, H. İ. & Özgan, H. (2006). Assessment of instructors with regard to instructional activities in classrooms. Gazi University Gazi Education Faculty Journal, 26(3), 263-273.
  10. Öztürk, M. & Alkış, S. (2009). Primary-school student teachers’ perceptions of geography. Elementary Education Online, 8(3), 782-797.
  11. Patton, M. Q. (2014). Qualitative research & evaluation methods. M. Bütün, & S. B. Demir (Trans. Eds.), Ankara:
  12. Pegem Publishing. Şahin, Ç. & Kartal, O. Y. (2013). The views of primary school education teacher candidates’ on primary school teacher education program. Usak University Journal of Social Sciences, 6(1), 164-190.
  13. Türkmen, L. (2002). Freshman elementary education major students' attitudes toward science and science teaching. Hacettepe University Education Faculty Journal, 23, 218-228.
  14. Uzun, A. (2006). Attitudes of gifted or special ability student toward the social studies