SavedAdd your journal

Journals / IOJET / 2020 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 2

DETERMINATION OF MIDDLE SCHOOL STUDENTS' VIEWS ABOUT STEM ACTIVITIES

Zeynep Ebru ALABAŞ
Ali AKPINAR
Ferhat KARAKAYA
Mehmet YILMAZ
Journal
IOJET
Pages
148–163
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In addition, lackof time and material and lack of information have been found to have problems in therealization of STEM activities.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this research, it is aimed to determine the opinions of middle school students aboutSTEM activities.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The research, which used case study from qualitative research designs, wasconducted in 2018-2019 academic year.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In addition, lackof time and material and lack of information have been found to have problems in therealization of STEM activities.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2018-2019 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In this research, it is aimed to determine the opinions of middle school students aboutSTEM activities. The research, which used case study from qualitative research designs, wasconducted in 2018-2019 academic year. The research working group is composed of 27middle school students studying in a private school in Turkey. In the data collection, semistructured interview forms prepared by the researchers were used. The data were analyzed inaccordance with the descriptive analysis. According to the findings of the research, it wasdetermined that STEM activities were related to daily life problems, and that students'lessons, occupational preferences and communication skills were affected. In addition, lackof time and material and lack of information have been found to have problems in therealization of STEM activities.

🔖

Cite This Article

ALABAŞ, Z. E., AKPINAR, A., KARAKAYA, F., YILMAZ, M. (2022). DETERMINATION OF MIDDLE SCHOOL STUDENTS' VIEWS ABOUT STEM ACTIVITIES. IOJET, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 2, 148–163. https://ajindex.com/articles/542284

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Acar, D., Tertemiz, N., & Taşdemir, A. (2018). The Effects of STEM training on the academic achievement of 4th graders in science and mathematics and their views on STEM training. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 10(4), 505- 513. Akbıyık, C., & Kalkan-Ay, G. (2014). Perceptions of pre-school administrators and teachers on thinking skills instruction: a case study. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 29(1), 1-18.
  2. Altan, E.B., & Üçüncüoğlu, İ. (2018). Fen bilimleri öğretmen adayları için STEM odaklı laboratuvar uygulamaları etkinliği: sağlıklı yaşam modülü’ne yönelik değerlendirmeler. Uluslararası Beşeri Bilimler ve Eğitim Dergisi, 4(9), 329-347.
  3. Baran, E., Canbazoglu Bilici, S., Mesutoglu, C., & Ocak, C. (2016). Moving STEM beyond schools: Students’ perceptions about an out-of-school STEM education program. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 4(1), 9- 19. Bozkurt, E. (2014). Mühendislik tasarım temelli fen eğitiminin fen bilgisi öğretmen adaylarının karar verme becerisi, bilimsel süreç becerileri ve sürece yönelik algılarına etkisi. (Doktora Tezi). Ankara,
  4. Gazi Üniversitesi.
  5. Bransford, J. D., Brown, A., & Cocking, R. (2000). How people learn: Mind, brain, experience and school, expanded edition. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
  6. Buyruk, B. & Korkmaz, Ö. (2016). FeTeMM farkındalık ölçeği (FFÖ): Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Türk Fen Eğitimi Dergisi, 13(2), 61-76.
  7. Çavaş, B., Bulut, Ç., Holbrook, J., & Rannikmae, M. (2013). Fen eğitimine mühendislik odaklı bir yaklaşım: ENGINEER projesi ve uygulamaları. Fen Bilimleri Öğretimi Dergisi, 1(1), 12-22.
  8. Choi, Y., & Hong, S.H. (2013). The Development and application effects of steam program about 'world of small organisms' unit in elementary science. Elementary Science Education, 32(3), 361-377.
  9. Christensen, R., Knezek, G., & Tyler-Wood, T. (2015). Alignment of hands-on STEM engagement activities with positive STEM dispositions in secondary school students. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 24(6), 898-909.
  10. Çınar, S., Pırasa, N., & Sadoğlu, G.P. (2016). Views of science and mathematics preservice teachers regarding STEM. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 4(6), 1479- 1487. Çorlu, M. S., Capraro, R.M. & Capraro, M.M. (2014). Introducing STEM education: Implications for educating our teachers for the age of innovation. Eğitim ve Bilim, 39(171), 74-85.
  11. Creswell, J.W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative