SavedAdd your journal

Journals / IOJET / 2020 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 2

EXPLORING THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE BELIEFS AND PRACTICES OF INSTRUCTORS ABOUT ORAL CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK IN EFL CLASSES: A CASE STUDY FROM TURKEY

Pınar KIR
Journal
IOJET
Pages
178–195
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results showed that the participants' stated beliefs and observed practices heldsome inconsistencies.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Although many studies were conducted on stated beliefs and observed practices of oralcorrective feedback (OCF) in language classes, relatively little is known about the actualrelationship between them.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Therefore, this study focused on the relationship between theteachers’ stated beliefs and observed practices of oral corrective feedback (OCF) to explorehow beliefs and practices interact.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results showed that the participants' stated beliefs and observed practices heldsome inconsistencies.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Although many studies were conducted on stated beliefs and observed practices of oralcorrective feedback (OCF) in language classes, relatively little is known about the actualrelationship between them. Therefore, this study focused on the relationship between theteachers’ stated beliefs and observed practices of oral corrective feedback (OCF) to explorehow beliefs and practices interact. The participants of the study were four Turkish EFLinstructors coming from English Language Teaching (ELT) and Translation and InterpretingStudies. The data were collected through a questionnaire, classroom observations, andinterviews. The results showed that the participants' stated beliefs and observed practices heldsome inconsistencies. These inconsistencies were explained by different factors stated by theparticipants during the stimulated recall sessions. The content knowledge of OCF and theproceduralization of this knowledge have been found to be the indicators of thisinconsistency. In addition to highlighting these different factors on the study of OCF, thisstudy presents the insights for the integration of OCF in EFL classes.

🔖

Cite This Article

KIR, P. (2022). EXPLORING THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE BELIEFS AND PRACTICES OF INSTRUCTORS ABOUT ORAL CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK IN EFL CLASSES: A CASE STUDY FROM TURKEY. IOJET, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 2, 178–195. https://ajindex.com/articles/542272

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (4)

  1. Ammar, A., & Spada, N. (2006). One size fits all? Recasts, prompts, and L2 learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 543–574. doi:10.1017/S0272263106060268 Basturkmen, H., Loewen, S., & Ellis, R. (2004). Teachers’ stated beliefs about incidental focus on form and their classroom practices. System, 40(2), 282-295. Retrieved from https://www.journals.elsevier.com/system
  2. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa Carroll, S. (1997). On the irrelevance of verbal feedback to language learning. In L. Eubank, L. Selinker, & M. Sharwood-Smith (Eds.) The Current State of Interlanguage (pp.73- 78). Amsterdam: Benjamins. Demir, Y., & Özmen, S. K. (2017). Exploring native and non-native EFL teachers’ oral corrective feedback practices: An observational study. Brock Education Journal, 26(2), 111-129. Retrieved from https://secure3.ed.brocku.ca/brocked/vol-26-no-2- 2016/
  3. Dong, Z. (2012). Beliefs and practices: A case study on oral corrective feedback in teaching Chinese as a foreign language (TCFL) classroom. MA, thesis, Arizona State University, US. Ellis, R. (2009). Corrective feedback and teacher development. L2 Journal, 1, 3-18. doi: 10.5070/l2.v1i1.9054 Farrell, T. S., & Lim, P. C. P. (2005). Conceptions of grammar teaching: A case study of teachers’ beliefs and classroom practices. Tesl-Ej, 9(2), 1–13. doi:10.1177/1362168814541722 Freeman, D., & Richards, J. (1996). A look at uncritical stories. In D. Freeman, J. Richards (Eds.), Teacher Learning in Language Teaching (pp. 1-6). CUP: Cambridge. Kagan, D. (1992). Implications of research on teachers’ beliefs. Educational Psychologist, 27, 65-90. doi: 10.1207/s15326985ep2701_6 Kamiya, N. (2014). The relationship between stated beliefs and classroom practices of oral corrective feedback. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 10(3), 206-219. doi: 10.1080/17501229.2014.939656 Karavas-Doukas, E. (1996). Using attitude scales to investigate teachers’ attitudes to the communicative approach. ELT Journal, 50, 187-198. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ529505
  4. Li, S. (2010). The effectiveness of corrective feedback in SLA: a meta-analysis. Language Learning, 60(2), 309-365. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00561.x Li, S. (2014). Oral corrective feedback. ELT Journal Volume, 68(2), 196-198. doi:10.1093/elt/cct076 Lightbown, P. M., & Spada, N. (2006). How Languages Are Learned (3rd ed.). Oxford: O