Journals / IOJET / 2020 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 3

USING WEB 2.0 TOOLS IN AND BEYOND THE UNIVERSITY CLASSROOMS: A CASE STUDY OF EDMODO

Journal
IOJET
Pages
1205–1219
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The result of thestudy showed that student-initiated communications via Edmodo were much fewer thanteacher-initiated communications.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:New internet technologies have not only transformed communication but alsorevolutionized teaching and learning.
📊
Key Findings & Data:One of the greatest steps forward in this area was Web2.0 technology.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The result of thestudy showed that student-initiated communications via Edmodo were much fewer thanteacher-initiated communications.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

New internet technologies have not only transformed communication but alsorevolutionized teaching and learning. One of the greatest steps forward in this area was Web2.0 technology. In addition, new technologies such as podcasts, social networking, and onlinelearning communities started to shape communication between teachers and students, andthese became tools for sharing educational content. This paper examines the use of Web 2.0tools in higher education, specifically in a case study of Edmodo. The first section of thepaper provides information about the relationship between Web technologies and education.The second section focuses on a case study using Edmodo as a Web 2.0 tool to teach classicalTurkish literature to third-year undergraduate students. The main purpose of the case study isto identify and classify the purposes for which the students and teacher preferred to useEdmodo for communication and in which ways they communicated with each other. A mixedresearch methodology with a combination of qualitative and quantitative methods was usedto collect the data. An open-ended survey was also conducted via SurveyMonkey(www.surveymonkey.com) in regard to students’ perceptions of Edmodo. The result of thestudy showed that student-initiated communications via Edmodo were much fewer thanteacher-initiated communications.

🔖

Cite This Article

EGÜZ, E. (2022). USING WEB 2.0 TOOLS IN AND BEYOND THE UNIVERSITY CLASSROOMS: A CASE STUDY OF EDMODO. IOJET, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 3, 1205–1219. https://ajindex.com/articles/542264

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Al-Said, Khalel M. (2015). Students’ Perceptions of Edmodo and Mobile Learning and Their Real Barriers Towards Them, The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 14 (2): 167-180.
  2. Balasubramanian, K., Jaykumar V., Fukey, L. (2014). A Study on “Student preference towards the use of Edmodo as a learning platform to create responsible learning environment”, Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 144:416-422.
  3. Berners-Lee, T.J., Cailliau R., Groff J.F. (1992). The World Wide Web. Computer Networks and ISDN Systems, 25: 454-459.
  4. Carlson, G. & Raphael R., (2015). Let’s Get Social: The Educator’s Guide to Edmodo. Eugene: International Society for Technology in Education. Dijck, Jose Van (2013). The Culture of Connectivity: A Critical History of Social Media. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  5. Dresner, E., Herring S. C. (2010), Functions of the Nonverbal in CMC: Emoticons and Illocutionary Force. Communication Theory, 20: 249-268. Edmodo website (n.d) https://www.edmodo.com/ Accessed 25.11.2018 Hamutoğlu Nazire Burcin and Mübin Kıyıcı (2017). Bir Eğitsel Sosyal Ağ Olarak Edmodo’nun Yükseköğretimde Kullanımına Yönelik Öğrenci Görüşlerinin İncelenmesi, Trakya Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 7 (2): 322-343.
  6. Harasim, Linda (2006). A History of E-Learning: Shift Happened. In J. Weiss, J. Nolan, J. Hunsinger & P. Trifonas (Eds.), The International Handbook of Virtual Learning Environments, 59-94. Dordrecht: Springer. Hope, John K. (2010). Technological Trends in Adult Education: Past, Present and in the Future. In Khosrow-Pour (Ed), Web-based Education: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools and Applications, 1: 9-27. Hershey: Information Science Reference. Kidd, T., Chen I. (2009). Wired for Learning: An Educators Guide to Web 2.0. Charlotte: Information Age Publication. Kidd, Terry T. (2010). A Brief History of eLearning. In Khosrow-Pour (Ed), Web-based Education: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools and Applications, 1: 1-8. Hershey: Information Science Reference. Manowong, Supaporn. (2016). Undergraduate Students’ Perceptions of Edmodo as a Supplementary Learning Tool in an EFL Classroom, Silpakorn University Journal of Social Sciences, Humanities and Art, 16 (2): 73-92.
  7. Mokhtar, F. A. (2018). Breaking Barriers Through Edmodo: A Qualitative Approach on the Perceptions of University of Malaya Undergraduates. Online Learning, 22 (1): 61-80.
  8. Nicholson Paul. (2007). A History of E-Learning. In Fernandez-Manjon, Sanchez-Perez, Gomez-Pulido, Vega-Rodriguez, Bravo-Rodrigu