Journals / IOJET / 2020 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 2

THE PERCEPTIONS AND PREFERENCES OF 8TH GRADE STUDENTS IN DIGITAL STORYTELLING IN ENGLISH

Journal
IOJET
Pages
196–216
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The implications are that digital storytelling canbe integrated into speaking, listening, grammar, vocabulary and writing activities since it isan engaging way of practising language skills.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Digital storytelling is the focus of the present study due to scarcity of studies in Turkey.This study investigates the perceptions of 8th grade students on the integration of technologyvia Digital Storytelling to English courses.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The study was conducted with 15 students in apublic school.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The implications are that digital storytelling canbe integrated into speaking, listening, grammar, vocabulary and writing activities since it isan engaging way of practising language skills.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Digital storytelling is the focus of the present study due to scarcity of studies in Turkey.This study investigates the perceptions of 8th grade students on the integration of technologyvia Digital Storytelling to English courses. Another aim is to find out students’ preferencesfor topic and characters in their digital stories. The study was conducted with 15 students in apublic school. The data were collected through pre-survey, digital stories, and post-survey.The study was carried out in a month period in which 5 different digital stories were created.The findings based on qualitative and quantitative analysis indicated that the perceptions ofthe participants toward the use of digital storytelling in English lessons were positive beforeand after the implementation process with no significant difference between them pre andpost-tests. In general, the participants wanted to keep using digital storytelling because theybelieved digital storytelling is motivating, contributes to language learning, and enablescollaboration. The topics preferred were adrenalin, love, sadness, friendship, and fear. Thecharacters were generally female heroines. The implications are that digital storytelling canbe integrated into speaking, listening, grammar, vocabulary and writing activities since it isan engaging way of practising language skills.

🔖

Cite This Article

OKUMUŞ, A. (2022). THE PERCEPTIONS AND PREFERENCES OF 8TH GRADE STUDENTS IN DIGITAL STORYTELLING IN ENGLISH. IOJET, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 2, 196–216. https://ajindex.com/articles/542262

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Alexandar, B. (2006). Web 2.0: A new wave of innovation for teaching and learning? EDUCAUSE Review, 41, 2, 32–44.
  2. Balaman, F. (2016). The effect of digital storytelling technique on the attitudes of students toward teaching technologies. Pegem Eğitim ve Öğretim Dergisi, 6(2), 147-168. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.14527/pegegog.2016.009
  3. Barrett, H. (2005). Digital storytelling research design. Kean University Digital Storytelling Conference. Behmer, S. (2005). Literature Review Digital storytelling: Examining the process with middle school students. In Proceedings of the Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 822-827).
  4. Blake, R. (2007). New trends in using technology in the language curriculum. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 27, 76-97.
  5. Bouman, K. (2012). Retention of Learning: Student-led Classrooms or Traditional Classrooms? Master of Science in Education. Southwest Minnesota State University. Bozdoğan, D. (2012). Content Analysis of ELT Students’ Digital Stories for Young Learners. Novitas-ROYAL (Research on Youth and Language), 2012, 6 (2), 126-136.
  6. Bull, G. & Kajder, S. (2005). Digital storytelling in the language arts classroom. Learning & Leading with Technology, 32 (4), 46-49.
  7. Cabrera, P., Castillo, L., González, P., Quiñónez, A., & Ochoa, C. (2018). The Impact of Using" Pixton" for Teaching Grammar and Vocabulary in the EFL Ecuadorian Context. Teaching English with Technology, 18(1), 53-76.
  8. Campbell, L. O., Planinz, T., & Miller, M. (2016). Integrated digital storytelling: An active learning strategy for building 21st Century skills. In EdMedia: World Conference on Educational Media and Technology (pp. 1820–1825). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Chapelle, C. A. (2003). English language learning and technology: Lectures on applied linguistics in the age of information and communication technology (Vol. 7). John Benjamins Publishing. Cirit, N. C. (2015). Assessing ELT Pre-Service Teachers via Web 2.0 Tools: Perceptions toward Traditional, Online and Alternative Assessment. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 14(3), 9-19.
  9. Council of Europe (2001). Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment. Strasbourg: Language Policy Division, Council of Europe. Ben Salah, H. (2015).
  10. Creswell, JW (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design. Choosing among five approaches (3e éd.). London: Sage. Approches inductives. Daki