Journals / IOJET / 2020 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 2

LANGUAGE INSTRUCTORS’ PERCEPTIONS AND APPLICATIONS OF CONTINUOUS PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT IN HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS

Journal
IOJET
Pages
46–61
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Attending research-oriented events such as seminars, conferences, and workshopswas mentioned as very effective for their continuous professional development.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Professional development can be defined as all the practices and activities for teachers’growth.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The comparative research was carriedout in the frame of COST Action CA15221 – Advancing effective institutional models towardscohesive teaching, learning, research and writing development – that addresses the field ofprofessional conversations and research.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Attending research-oriented events such as seminars, conferences, and workshopswas mentioned as very effective for their continuous professional development.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Professional development can be defined as all the practices and activities for teachers’growth. In the area of English language teaching, teachers need to follow the pedagogical andpractical developments in their field, thereby developing themselves professionally. This studyaims at figuring out and comparing the perceptions and applications of language instructors inhigher education institutions in Latvia and Turkey on continuous professional development.The authors carried out a small scale research in order to answer the question “What are themost effective forms of professional development for English language instructors?” A semistructured interview was implemented to gather the data. The comparative research was carriedout in the frame of COST Action CA15221 – Advancing effective institutional models towardscohesive teaching, learning, research and writing development – that addresses the field ofprofessional conversations and research. The main finding of the study is that English languageinstructors thought that the responsibility of continuous professional development primarilybelonged to themselves and then their institutions and the other professional institutions.Majority of them claimed that their professional development was triggered by their curiosityand passion. Attending research-oriented events such as seminars, conferences, and workshopswas mentioned as very effective for their continuous professional development.

🔖

Cite This Article

IVANOVA, I., ERCAN, B. (2022). LANGUAGE INSTRUCTORS’ PERCEPTIONS AND APPLICATIONS OF CONTINUOUS PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT IN HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS. IOJET, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 2, 46–61. https://ajindex.com/articles/542248

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (5)

  1. Aliakbari, M., & Malmir, B. (2017). Development and validation of an English language teacher learning scale, Cogent Education, 4(1), 292613. Akyazı, K. & Geylanioğlu, S. (2015). Peer observation: a systematic investigation for continuous professional development. In K. Dikilitaş, R. Smith, & W. Trotman (Eds.), Teacher-researchers in action (pp. 71-86). IATEFL Research SIG Publication. Atay, D. (2008) Teacher research for professional development. ELT Journal, 62(2), 139-147, DOI: 10.1093/elt/ccl053. Best+ (2018). Blended Erasmus+ Staff Training. Retrieved from http://beta.blendedmobility.eu/
  2. Borg, S. (2014). Teacher research for professional development. Innovation in English Language Teacher Education. In G. Pickering & P. Gunashekar (Eds.). Selected papers from the fourth International Teacher Educator Conference Hyderabad, India, 23-28.
  3. Bredeson, P.V. (2000). The school principal’s role in teacher professional development. Journal of In-Service Education, 26(2), 385-401, DOI: 10.1080/13674580000200114 Craft, A. (2000). Continuing professional development: A practical guide for teachers and schools (2nd ed.). London: Routledge Falmer. Çelik, S., Macianskiene, N., & Aytın, K. (2013). Turkish and Lithuanian EFL instructors’ professional development experiences: Worth the effort, or waste of time? Erzincan University Journal of Education Faculty, 15(2), 160-187.
  4. Daloğlu, A. (2004). A professional development program for primary school English language teachers in Turkey: Designing a materials bank. International Journal of Educational Development, 24(6), 677-690.
  5. Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M.E., Gardner, M, Espinoza, ED, 2017). Effective Teacher Professional Development. Learning Policy Institute. Retrieved from https://learningpolicyinstitute.org/sites/default/files/productfiles/Effective_Teacher_Pro fessional_Development_REPORT.pdf Darling-Hammond, L., Wei, R.C., Andree, A., Richardson N., & Orphanos, S. (2009). Professional learning in the learning profession: A status report on teacher development in United States and abroad (National Staff Development Council). Dallas. Retrieved from https://learningforward.org/docs/default-source/ pdf/nsdcstudy2009.pdf Davidson, G., Dunlop, F., Soriano, D.H., Kennedy, L. & Philips, T. (2012). Going Forward: Continuous Professional Development for English Language Teachers in the UK. British Council. Retrieved from https://englishagenda.britishcouncil.org/sites/default/files/attachments/b413_managing_ cpd_v2_1.pdf Eu