Journals / IOJET / 2020 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 3

EXAMINING PROJECT-BASED STEM TRAINING IN A PRIMARY SCHOOL

Journal
IOJET
Pages
811–825
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Research findings revealed that successful implementation of STEM practicesnecessitates a systematic working plan consisting of preparation, implementation andevaluation stages.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This research primarily aims to examine project-based STEM training implemented in astate primary school in Turkey regarding teachers’ and students’ views.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The phenomenologicaldesign, which is one of the qualitative research designs, was exclusively adopted in the study.The research sampling consisted of 18 students and 2 teachers working at a state primary schoollocated in an Anatolian province during the 2017-2018 academic year.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Research findings revealed that successful implementation of STEM practicesnecessitates a systematic working plan consisting of preparation, implementation andevaluation stages.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2017-2018 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This research primarily aims to examine project-based STEM training implemented in astate primary school in Turkey regarding teachers’ and students’ views. The phenomenologicaldesign, which is one of the qualitative research designs, was exclusively adopted in the study.The research sampling consisted of 18 students and 2 teachers working at a state primary schoollocated in an Anatolian province during the 2017-2018 academic year. The research data werecollected through interviews some of which were voice-recorded and analyzed through contentanalysis. Research findings revealed that successful implementation of STEM practicesnecessitates a systematic working plan consisting of preparation, implementation andevaluation stages. Besides, it was revealed that STEM training practices facilitate unearthingstudents’ talents and developing their critical thinking and problem-solving skills as well asmanual dexterity. The research findings also suggested that these practices increasecooperation among students, help them develop a positive attitude towards the lesson andbehave more carefully during the classes. Nonetheless, various problems such as inadequatespace, teaching materials and group-work driven problems were observed during STEMpractices. Based on the research findings, it is suggested that STEM training should beseparately implemented without being included in a single discipline.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇETİN, A. (2022). EXAMINING PROJECT-BASED STEM TRAINING IN A PRIMARY SCHOOL. IOJET, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 3, 811–825. https://ajindex.com/articles/542243

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Akgündüz, D., Aydeniz, M., Çakmakçı, G., Çavaş, B., Çorlu, M. S., Öner, T. & Özdemir, S. (2015). STEM eğitimi Türkiye raporu: Günün modası mı yoksa gereksinim mi? [A report on STEM education in Turkey: A provisional agenda or a necessity?] İstanbul: İstanbul Aydın Üniversitesi STEM Merkezi ve Eğitim Fakültesi Yayınları.
  2. Altunel, M. (2018). STEM eğitimi ve Türkiye: Fırsatlar ve riskler [STEM training and Turkey: Opportunities and risks]. Seta Perspektif, 207, 1-7.
  3. Bahar, M., Yener, D., Yılmaz M., Emen, H. & Gürer, F. (2018). 2018 Fen bilimleri öğretim programı kazanımlarındaki değişimler ve fen teknoloji matematik mühendislik (STEM) entegrasyonu [The changes of standards in the 2018 Science curriculum and STEM integration]. Abant İzzet Baysal University Faculty of Education Journal, 18(2), 702- 735. Bakırcı, H. & Kutlu, E. (2018). Fen bilimleri öğretmenlerinin FeTeMM yaklaşımı hakkındaki görüşlerinin belirlenmesi [Determination of science teachers’ views on STEM approach]. Türk Bilgisayar ve Matematik Eğitimi Dergisi, 9(2), 367-389.
  4. Baran, E., Canbazoğlu Bilici, S. & Mesutoğlu, C. (2015). Fen, teknoloji, mühendislik ve matematik (FeTeMM) spotu geliştirme etkinliği [Science, technology, engineering, and mathematıcs (STEM) publıc servıce announcement (PSA) development activity]. Araştırma Temelli Etkinlik Dergisi (ATED), 5(2), 60-69.
  5. Bozkurt, E. (2014). Mühendislik tasarım temelli fen eğitiminin fen bilgisi öğretmen adaylarının karar verme becerisi, bilimsel süreç becerileri ve sürece yönelik algılarına etkisi [The effect of engineering design based science instruction on science teacher candidates' decision making skills, science process skills and perceptions about the process]. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Gazi University Institute of Educational Sciences, Ankara.
  6. Breiner, J. M., Harkness, S. S., Johnson, C. C. & Koehler, C. M. (2012). What is STEM? A discussion about conceptions of STEM in education and partnerships. School Science and Mathematics, 112(1), 3-11
  7. Bybee, R. (2010). Advancing STEM education: A 2020 vision. Technology and Engineering Teacher, 7(1), 30-35.
  8. Creswell, J. W. (2016). Nitel araştırma yöntemleri, beş yaklaşıma göre nitel araştırma ve araştırma Deseni [Qualitative research methods, qualitative research and research design according to five approaches]. (Çeviri Ed. M. Bütün & S. B. Demir) Ankara:
  9. Siyasal Kitabevi Çepni, S (2018). Kuramdan uygulamaya STEM eğitimi [STEM education from theory to practice]. (2nd edition). Ankara: Pe