Journals / IOJET / 2020 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 4

THE RELATIONSHIP AMONG ORGANIZATIONAL MYOPIA, ORGANIZATIONAL RESILIENCE AND ORGANIZATIONAL SUSTAINABILITY AT A HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTION IN TURKEY: A STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELLING

Journal
IOJET
Pages
1470–1491
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As result, it was found that the established modelhad acceptable and excellent compliance values.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study aimed to introduce a structural equation model of testing the mediation role oforganizational resilience in the relationship between organizational myopia andorganizational sustainability.
📊
Key Findings & Data:For this purpose, the participants of thestudy comprised purposefully selected 322 academics at Sakarya University, which was theonly university in Turkey having the relevant award holistically.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As result, it was found that the established modelhad acceptable and excellent compliance values.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2019 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This study aimed to introduce a structural equation model of testing the mediation role oforganizational resilience in the relationship between organizational myopia andorganizational sustainability. Thus, it was designed with structural regression model. In thestudy, it was aimed to collect data from a higher education organization which had alreadyreceived “Turkey Continuity in Excellence Award”. For this purpose, the participants of thestudy comprised purposefully selected 322 academics at Sakarya University, which was theonly university in Turkey having the relevant award holistically. For the data collection,“Organizational Sustainability Scale” developed by Sezen-Gültekin (2019), “OrganizationalResilience Scale” and “Organizational Myopia Scale” adapted to educational organizationsby Sezen-Gültekin (2019) were utilized. As result, it was found that the established modelhad acceptable and excellent compliance values. In addition, it was determined that theorganizational myopia independent variable directly affected the organizational resiliencedependent variable, while it was both directly and indirectly organizational sustainabilitydependent variable. It was also seen that the organizational resilience independent variabledirectly affected the organizational sustainability dependent variable. In addition, it wasobserved that the organizational myopia and the organizational resilience variables hadindirect effects on the sub-dimensions of executive, economic, social, cultural andenvironmental sustainability.

🔖

Cite This Article

Sezen-GÜLTEKİN, G., ARGON, T. (2022). THE RELATIONSHIP AMONG ORGANIZATIONAL MYOPIA, ORGANIZATIONAL RESILIENCE AND ORGANIZATIONAL SUSTAINABILITY AT A HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTION IN TURKEY: A STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELLING. IOJET, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 4, 1470–1491. https://ajindex.com/articles/542241

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Akbaba Altun, S. (2009). İlköğretim öğrencilerinin akademik başarısızlıklarına ilişkin veli, öğretmen ve öğrenci görüşlerinin incelenmesi. İlköğretim Online, 8(2), 567-586.
  2. Aktan, C.C. & Gencel, U. (2007). Yükseköğretimde akreditasyon. Organizasyon ve Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi, 2(2), 137-146.
  3. Altınay, A., Mercan, N., Aksanyar, Y., & Sert, S. (2012). Işletme körlüğü, silo sendromu ve çözüm önerisi olarak örgütsel zekâ. Organizasyon ve Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi, 4(1), 13-19.
  4. Aykaç, M. & Kar, B. B. (2018). Yükseköğretimde devlet ve vakıf üniversiteleri: sorunlar ve politika önerileri. Finans Politik & Ekonomik Yorumlar, 55(642), 69-92.
  5. Aytemiz Seymen, O., Kılıç, T. & Kinter, O. (2016). Örgütsel körlüğün (örgüt miyopisi) ayrıntılı kavramsal analizi ve ölçümü: geliştirilen bir ölçek yardımıyla değerlendirme. Sözlü sunum. 15. Ulusal İşletmecilik Kongresi Bildiriler Kitabı, 26-28 Mayıs 2016,
  6. İstanbul.
  7. Barasa, E., Mbau, R. & Gilson, L. (2018). What is resilience and how can it be nurtured? A systematic review of empirical literature on organizational resilience. International Journal of Health Policy and Management, 7(6), 491-503.
  8. Baskan, G.A. (2001). Türkiye’de yükseköğretimin gelişimi. Gazi Üniversitesi Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 21(1), 21-32.
  9. Baş, A. (2013). İşletmeleri Dönüştürme Aracı Olarak Pazarlama Miyopisinin Stratejik Değerlendirilmesi: Türkiye Tekstil Işletmelerinde Araştırma. Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Isparta. Baumgartner, H. & Homburg, C. (1996). Applications of structural equation modeling in marketing and consumer research: A review. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 13(2), 139-161.
  10. Bayram, N. (2010). Yapısal eşitlik modellemesine giriş: AMOS uygulamaları. Bursa: Ezgi Kitabevi.
  11. Bentler, P.M. & Bonett, D.G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588-606. Birleşmiş Milletler Kalkınma Programı (United Nations Development Programme-UNDP) 2014.
  12. Bollen, K.A. (1990). Overall fit in covariance structure models: Two types of sample size effects. Psychological Bulletin, 107(2), 256-259.
  13. Bouaziz, F. & Smaoui Hachicha, Z. (2018). Strategic human resource management practices and organizational resilience. Journal of Management Development, 37(7), 537-551.
  14. Bowen, D.J. (2018). Leading the way to organizational resilience. Healthcare Executive, Jan/Feb(2018), 8-9.
  15. Browne, M.W. & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternat