SavedAdd your journal

Journals / IOJET / 2020 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 3

PROSPECTIVE SCIENCE TEACHERS’ VIEWS ON CAREER PLANNING AND THEIR SELF-EFFICACY LEVELS FOR CAREER DECISION-MAKING

Elvan İNCE AKA
Mehmet Fatih TAŞAR
Journal
IOJET
Pages
960–975
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The findings revealedthat for career decision-making, the participants had high efficacy levels; they werepredominantly doing their own career planning; and that they were influenced by their familymembers’ views.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this survey study was to determine prospective science teachers’ competencylevels in making career decisions and to determine their views on career planning.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Theparticipants were 88 prospective middle school science teachers enrolled at the ScienceTeaching Program of a state university during the spring 2018.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The findings revealedthat for career decision-making, the participants had high efficacy levels; they werepredominantly doing their own career planning; and that they were influenced by their familymembers’ views.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2018 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The aim of this survey study was to determine prospective science teachers’ competencylevels in making career decisions and to determine their views on career planning. Theparticipants were 88 prospective middle school science teachers enrolled at the ScienceTeaching Program of a state university during the spring 2018. The data were collected throughthe Career Decision-Making Self-Efficacy Scale (CDSS) (Ulaş & Yıldırım, 2016) and openended, written extended response questions prepared by the researcher. The findings revealedthat for career decision-making, the participants had high efficacy levels; they werepredominantly doing their own career planning; and that they were influenced by their familymembers’ views. They envisioned career planning as a long-term process starting at birth andencompassing the whole school and professional lives. The majority thought that their careerdecisions affected every aspect of their lives.

🔖

Cite This Article

AKA, E. İ., TAŞAR, M. F. (2022). PROSPECTIVE SCIENCE TEACHERS’ VIEWS ON CAREER PLANNING AND THEIR SELF-EFFICACY LEVELS FOR CAREER DECISION-MAKING. IOJET, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 3, 960–975. https://ajindex.com/articles/542234

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Akoglan Kozak, M. & Dalkıranoglu, T. (2013). Mezun öğrencilerin kariyer algılamaları: Anadolu Üniversitesi örneği (Graduate students' perceptions of career: The case of Anadolu University). Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 13(1), 41- 52. Anafarta, N. (2001). Orta düzey yöneticilerin kariyer planlamasına bireysel perspektif (Individual perspective to the career planning of middle level managers). Akdeniz İ.İ.B.F. Dergisi, 1-17.
  2. Aydemir, N. (1995). 2000’li yıllara doğru özel imalat sanayiinde insan kaynakları yönetimi ve kariyer arayışları (Human resources management and career seeking in private manufacturing industry towards 2000s). İstanbul:
  3. Tügiad Yayıncılık. Bakırcıoğlu, R. (2005). İlköğretim, ortaöğretim ve yükseköğretimde rehberlik ve psikolojik danışma (Guidance and psychological counseling in primary, secondary, and higher education). Ankara:
  4. Anı Yayıncılık. Bandura, A., Barbaranelli, C., Caprara, G.V., & Pastorelli, C. (2001). Self-efficacy beliefs as shapers of children’s aspirations and career trajectories. Child Development, 72, 187- 206. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00273.
  5. Betz, N. E., Klein, K. L., & Taylor, K. M. (1996). Evaluation of a short form of the career decision-making self-efficacy scale. Journal of Career Assessment, 4, 47–57.
  6. Betz, N. E., & Voyten, K. K. (1997). Efficacy and outcome expectations influence career exploration and decidedness. The Career Development Quarterly, 46(2), 179–189. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2161-0045.1997.tb01004.x
  7. Blau P. (1992). Mobility and status attainment. Contemporary Sociology, 21, 596–598.
  8. Charokopaki, K. A. (2012). Career decision-making self-efficacy of secondary education students: The role of personality, environmental factors and contextual supports (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Thessaly, Greece. Chen, C.P. (1998) Understanding career development: A convergence of perspectives. Journal of Vocational Education and Training, 50(3), 437-461. doi: 10.1080/13636829800200053 Chi, M. T. H. (1997). Quantifying qualitative analyses of verbal data: A practical guide. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 6(3), 271-315. doi: 10.1207/s15327809jls0603_1 Chope, R. C. (2005). Qualitatively assessing family influence in career decision making. Journal of Career Assessment, 13, 395–414.
  9. Conroy, C. A. (1997, March). Predictors of occupational choice among rural youth: Implications for career education and development programming. Paper presented at the Annual M