Journals / IOJET / 2020 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 1

IMPROVING SECONDARY SCIENCE INSTRUCTION THROUGH CONTENT AND LANGUAGE INTEGRATED LEARNING (CLIL) IN SRI LANKA

Journal
IOJET
Pages
141–148
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Thestudy concluded that curriculum materials were not focused on CLIL and teachers neededheavy support for content and language integrating for the teaching of science in secondaryclasses.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:There has been a growing interest in incorporating CLIL (Content and Language IntegratedLearning) methodology in the Sri Lankan national education system.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The 4C's model of Coyle et al (2010)is a popular model for the implementation of CLIL and Sri Lankan system has encouragedusing this CLIL model.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Thestudy concluded that curriculum materials were not focused on CLIL and teachers neededheavy support for content and language integrating for the teaching of science in secondaryclasses.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2010 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

There has been a growing interest in incorporating CLIL (Content and Language IntegratedLearning) methodology in the Sri Lankan national education system. CLIL refers to methodswhere subjects, or parts of subjects, are taught through a foreign language to improve bothacademic subject knowledge and foreign language skills. The 4C's model of Coyle et al (2010)is a popular model for the implementation of CLIL and Sri Lankan system has encouragedusing this CLIL model. The main objective of this study was to inquire how CLIL isimplemented in secondary science classrooms and to support the teachers. The study was actionresearch. The collaborative action research group comprised a faculty member, a postgraduateresearch student and ten secondary science teachers from five schools. Arising from the factfinding needs analysis, the intervention designed included researcher-led teacher workshops tosupport teachers to plan CLIL lessons. The lessons were implemented in the respective schoolsby the sample of teachers during school two terms with the support of the researchers. Thestudy concluded that curriculum materials were not focused on CLIL and teachers neededheavy support for content and language integrating for the teaching of science in secondaryclasses. Preparation of teacher instructional manuals addressing CLIL and in-service teacherdevelopment for CLIL lesson planning is recommended.

🔖

Cite This Article

VITHANAPATHIRANA, M., LAKSHMI, N. (2022). IMPROVING SECONDARY SCIENCE INSTRUCTION THROUGH CONTENT AND LANGUAGE INTEGRATED LEARNING (CLIL) IN SRI LANKA. IOJET, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 1, 141–148. https://ajindex.com/articles/542222

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (5)

  1. Coyle, D., Hood, P & Marsh. (2010) CLIL: Content and language integrated learning. Cambridge: CUP. Infante, P. & Licona, P. R. (2018). Translanguaging as pedagogy: Developing learner scientific discursive practices in a bilingual middle school science classroom. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, DOI:10.1080/13670050.2018.1526885. Jappienen, A. (2005). Teaching through a foreign Language in Finland, Language and Education, 19(2), 148-163.
  2. Kemmis, S. & Mc Taggart, R. (Eds.). (1988). The action research planner (3rd edition) Waurn Ponds: Deakin University Press Kwangsawad, T. (2018). Training pre-service EFA teachers for CLIL. European Journal of Education Studies, 4(1), 174-185.
  3. Marsh, D. (2002). Content and language integrated learning: The European dimension - actions, trends and foresight potential. Retrieved from http://europa.eu.int/comm/education/languages/index.html (10 February 2019)
  4. Ministry of Education (2012). Education sector development framework and program 2013- 2017.
  5. Ministry of Education (2015). Annual Performance Report: Ministry of Education, Sri Lanka National Education Commission (2003). Policy Proposals for General Education in Sri Lanka, Sri Lanka: National Education Commission. Nettikumara.N. & Vithanapathirana, M. (2015). CLIL in secondary Science: Reorganizing the monolingual curricula for bilingual education in Sri Lanka. In Dawn Garbett and Alan Ovens (Eds) Teaching for Tomorrow Today, Auckland: Edify Ltd. Premarathna, A., S.J. Yogaraja, S.J., Medawattegedara, V., Senarathna, C.D. & Abdullah, M.R.M. (2014). Study on medium of instruction, national and international languages in General education in Sri Lanka. Sri Lanka: National Education Commission. Rodriguez, M.S.M. (2018). The flexibility of a CLIL teacher. Anglisticum Journal, 7(5), 10- 20. Yassin, S.M., Tek, O.E., Alimon, H., Baharom, S & Ying, L. Y. (2010) Teaching science through English: Engaging pupils cognitively, International CLIL Research Journal,1(3), 20-34.