SavedAdd your journal

Journals / IOJET / 2020 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 2

AUTHENTIC MATERIALS FOR FRESHMEN STUDENTS: A CASE OF SPEAKING CLASS IN A PRIVATE UNIVERSITY

Dewi ROCHSANTININGSIH
Joko NURKAMTO
Laksnoria KARYUATRY
Journal
IOJET
Pages
164–177
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results show that the teachers used threekinds of AMs in the classroom: audio material such as recordings and broadcast news, audiovisual material such as videos, and printed material such as photos, pictures, images, articles,and a map.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study aims at exploring Authentic Materials used in teaching speaking for universitystudents.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The study was conducted at the language centerof a university in Indonesia in the first semester of the 2018/2019 academic year.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results show that the teachers used threekinds of AMs in the classroom: audio material such as recordings and broadcast news, audiovisual material such as videos, and printed material such as photos, pictures, images, articles,and a map.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2018 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This study aims at exploring Authentic Materials used in teaching speaking for universitystudents. A case study method is implemented. The study was conducted at the language centerof a university in Indonesia in the first semester of the 2018/2019 academic year. The data werecollected by three instruments: interview, classroom observation, and document analysis. Thedata were analyzed using an interactive method. The results show that the teachers used threekinds of AMs in the classroom: audio material such as recordings and broadcast news, audiovisual material such as videos, and printed material such as photos, pictures, images, articles,and a map. It is found that the most used type is video since it can be very useful to developspeaking, listening and pronunciation skills. The results of this study also reveal that teachersmight take useful AMs from selected websites and combine them with the course book in orderto support teaching-learning activity.

🔖

Cite This Article

ROCHSANTININGSIH, D., NURKAMTO, J., KARYUATRY, L. (2022). AUTHENTIC MATERIALS FOR FRESHMEN STUDENTS: A CASE OF SPEAKING CLASS IN A PRIVATE UNIVERSITY. IOJET, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 2, 164–177. https://ajindex.com/articles/542208

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Ary, D., Jacob, L. C., & Sorense, C. K. (2010). Introduction to research in education. Wadsworth Cengage Learning. Berardo, S. A. (2006). The use of authentic materials in the teaching of reading. The Reading Matrix, 6(2), 60-69.
  2. Bordonaro, K. (2018). Adult education and academic libraries. Information and Learning Sciences, 119(7/8), 422-431.
  3. Carter, R., & Nunan, D. (Eds.), (2001). The Cambridge guide to teaching English to speakers of other languages. Cambridge University Press.
  4. Ellis, M., & Johnson, C. (1996). Teaching business English. Hong Kong: Oxford. Field, J. (2009). Listening in the language classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  5. Foppoli, J. (2006). Ezine articles, authentic vs graded material in second languages. Fraenkel, J. R. & Wallen, N. E. (2000). How to design and evaluate research in education. Boston; Mc-Graw-Hill. Genhard, J., G. (1996). Teaching English as a foreign language: A teacher self-development and methodology. Ann Arbor: the University of Michigan Press.
  6. Gilmore, A. (2007). Authentic materials and authenticity in foreign language learning. Language Teaching, 40, 97-118.
  7. Guariento, W., & Morely, J. (2001). Text and task authenticity in the EFL classroom. ELT Journal, 55 (4), 347-353.
  8. Herod, L. (2002). Adult learning from theory to practice. Heinemann: Heinle and Heinle Publishers.
  9. Iucu, R. B., & Marin, E. (2014). Authentic learning in adult education. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 142, 410-515.
  10. Kilickaya, F. (2004). Authentic materials and culture content in EFL classrooms. The Internet ELT Journal, 10(7). Laniro, S. (2007). Professional development authentic material. California Adult Literacy Professional Development Project (CALPRO), 1, 1-2.
  11. Lee. (1995). Authenticity Revisited: Text Authenticity and Learner Authenticity. ELT Journal, 49(4), 325-328.
  12. Losada, C. A. C., Insuasty, E. A., & Osorio, J. F. M. (2017). The impact of authentic materials and tasks on students’ communicative competence at a Columbian language school. PROFILE Issues in Teachers’ Professional Development, 19(1), 89-104.
  13. Martinez, A.G. (2002). Authentic materials: An overview on Karen's linguistic issues. http://www3.telus.net/linguisticsissues/authenticmaterials.html.
  14. McGrath, I. (2002). Materials evaluation and design for language teaching. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
  15. Miles, M. B., & Hubberman, A. M. (1984). Qualitative data analysis. California: SAGE Publication. Miller, M. (2005). Improving aural comprehension skills in EFL, usi