SavedAdd your journal

Journals / IOJET / 2021 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 1

THECHARACTERISTICSOFTEACHERSINEFFECTIVESCHOOLS:A SECONDARY ANALYSIS OF TALIS

Safiye Bilican-Demir
Journal
IOJET
Pages
525–545
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to the results, teachers' scores on the Classroom Disciplinary Climate, Self-Efficacy, and Teacher-Student Relations scale significantly changed in terms of thepossibility of schools’success in PISA 2012.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of the study wasto determine the characteristics of teachers whowereeffective in classifying low-and high-performing schools in PISA 2012for Singapore.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The TALIS 2013 teacher survey was used to identify the variables,and the data were obtained from the OECD official website.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to the results, teachers' scores on the Classroom Disciplinary Climate, Self-Efficacy, and Teacher-Student Relations scale significantly changed in terms of thepossibility of schools’success in PISA 2012.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2013 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The purpose of the study wasto determine the characteristics of teachers whowereeffective in classifying low-and high-performing schools in PISA 2012for Singapore. The TALIS 2013 teacher survey was used to identify the variables,and the data were obtained from the OECD official website. All schools participating in the PISA 2012 wereranked in terms of average achievement scores and the schools in the top,and the bottom 25% were selected for analysis. Given the structure of the research data, the IDB Analyzer program was used,and the data were resolved using binary logistic regression analysis. According to the results, teachers' scores on the Classroom Disciplinary Climate, Self-Efficacy, and Teacher-Student Relations scale significantly changed in terms of thepossibility of schools’success in PISA 2012. The findingsof the studywere also discussed within the scope of the related literature

🔖

Cite This Article

Bilican-Demir, S. (2022). THECHARACTERISTICSOFTEACHERSINEFFECTIVESCHOOLS:A SECONDARY ANALYSIS OF TALIS. IOJET, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 1, 525–545. https://ajindex.com/articles/542184

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Adeyemi, O. (2011). Measures of association for research in educational planning and administration. Research Journal of Mathematics and Statistics,3(3), 82-90. Retrieved from: http://maxwellsci.com/print/rjms/v3-82-90.pdf
  2. Akiba, M., LeTendre, G. K., & Scribner, J. P. (2016). Teacher quality, opportunity gap, and national achievement in 46 countries. Educational Researcher, 36(7), 369-387. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189x07308739
  3. Almog, O., & Shechtman, Z. (2007). Teachers' democratic and efficacy beliefs and styles of coping with behavioural problems of pupils with special needs. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 22, 115–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856250701267774
  4. Ashraf, G., & Abd Kadir, S. (2012). A review on the models of organizational effectiveness:A look at Cameron's model in higher education. International Education Studies, 5(2), 80-87. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v5n2p80
  5. Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191–215. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
  6. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. In E. Cliffs (Eds.), Prentice Hall series in social learning theory(Vol. 1 p. 94-107). New Jersey: Prentice-Hall. Banerjee,N., Stearns, E., Moller, S., & Mickelson, R. A. (2017). Teacher job satisfaction and student achievement: The roles of teacher professional community and teacher collaboration in schools. American Journal of Education, 123(2), 1-39. https://doi.org/10.1086/689932
  7. Baumert, J., Kunter, M., Blum,W., Brunner, M., Voss, T., & Jordan, A. (2010). Teachers' mathematical knowledge, cognitive activation in the classroom, and student progress. American Educational Research Journal, 47, 133-180. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831209345157
  8. Bloom, B.S., Hastings, J.T., & Madaus, G.F. (1971). Handbook on formative and summative evaluation.New York: McGaw-Hill.Brandsma, H. P., & Knuver, J. W. (1989). Effects of school and classroom characteristics on pupil progress in language and arithmetic.International Journal of Educational Research, 13(7), 777–788. https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-0355(89)90028-1,
  9. Cambron-Mccabe, N. H. (2002). Educational accountability in the USA: Focus on state testing. Education and the Law, 14, 117–126. https://doi.org/10.1080/09539960220149227
  10. Cameron, K. (1978). Measuring organizational effectiveness in institutions of higher education. Administrative Science Quarterly,23, 604-629. https://doi.org