Journals / IOJET / 2021 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 4

INVESTIGATION OF PRE-SERVICE MATHEMATICS TEACHERS' CREATIVE THINKING TENDENCIES

Journal
IOJET
Pages
2297–2316
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Based on the findings, recommendations for future research and educational implications are presented.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Creative thinking has played a critical role in a number of fields such as science, technology, economy, and education.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The study included 130 pre-service elementary mathematics teachers and used “The Marmara Creative Thinking Tendencies Scale” developed by Özgenel and Çetin (2017) as the data collection tool.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Based on the findings, recommendations for future research and educational implications are presented.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2017 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Creative thinking has played a critical role in a number of fields such as science, technology, economy, and education. Given the necessity of creative thinking in mathematics teaching, it can be argued that teachers are responsible for transforming their students into creative thinkers. In this context, the present study aims to determine pre-service mathematics teachers’ levels of critical thinking tendency and the main as well as interaction effects of demographic variables (i.e., gender, year, and academic achievement) on critical thinking tendency. The study makes use of the survey and causal-comparative designs. The study included 130 pre-service elementary mathematics teachers and used “The Marmara Creative Thinking Tendencies Scale” developed by Özgenel and Çetin (2017) as the data collection tool. Descriptive and two-way analysis of variance were used. The study reported high creative tendency levels of pre-service teacher. Another outcome of the study shows that the variables of gender, year, and academic achievement did not have significant main effect on creative tendency levels of pre-service teachers. Besides, the interaction effect of gender-year and gender-academic achievement on the creative thinking tendency levels of pre-service teachers are not statistically significant. Based on the findings, recommendations for future research and educational implications are presented.

🔖

Cite This Article

Erdoğan, F., Yıldız, F. (2022). INVESTIGATION OF PRE-SERVICE MATHEMATICS TEACHERS' CREATIVE THINKING TENDENCIES. IOJET, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 4, 2297–2316. https://ajindex.com/articles/542148

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Ai, X. (1999). Creativity and academic achievement: An investigation of gender differences. Creativity Research Journal, 12, 329–337. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj120411.
  2. Akpur, U. (2020). Critical, reflective, creative thinking and their reflections on academic achievement. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 37, Article 100683. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100683.
  3. Andreasen, N. C. (2015). The creating brain: the neuroscience of genius (K. Güney, Trans.). Ankara:
  4. Arkadaş Publishing. Aydın-Güç, F., & Keskin, S. (2021). Problem-posing creativity of primary school 6th grade students and the relationship between their problem posing self-efficacy and problem posing creativity. Journal of Computer and Education Research, 9(17), 145-176. https://doi.org/10.18009/jcer.794498.
  5. Aydoğdu, N., & Yüksel, I. (2013). The Relationship between prospective mathematics teachers’ beliefs and attitudes towards history of mathematics and their creativeness level. Journal of Research in Education and Teaching, 2(4), 186-194.
  6. Baer, J., & Kaufman, J. C. (2008). Gender differences in creativity. Journal of Creative Behavior, 42(2), 75–105.
  7. Balka, D. S. (1974). Creative ability in mathematics. Arithmetic Teachers, 21(7), 633-636.
  8. Batey, M. (2012). The measurement of creativity: from definitional consensus to the introduction of a new heuristic framework. Creativity Research Journal, 24(1), 55-65. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2012.649181.
  9. Bart, W. M., Can, I., & Hokanson, B. (2020). Exploring the relation between high creativity and high achievement among 8th and 11th graders. International Online Journal of Education and Teaching (IOJET), 7(3), 712-720.
  10. Bart, W. M., Hokanson, B., & Sahin, I. (2015). An investigation of the gender differences in creative thinking abilities among 8th and 11th grade students. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 17, 17–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2015.03.003.
  11. Bicer, A., Lee, Y., Perihan, C., Capraro, M. M., & Capraro, R. M. (2020). Considering mathematical creative self-efficacy with problem posing as a measure of mathematical creativity. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 105, 457-485. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-020-09995-8.
  12. Cenberci, S. (2018). The investigation of the creative thinking tendency of perspective mathematics teachers in terms of different variables. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 6(9), 78-85. https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v6i9.3434.
  13. Couger, J. D., Higgins, L. F., & McIntyre, S. C. (1990). Differentiatin