SavedAdd your journal

Journals / IOJET / 2021 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 2

PROSPECTIVE TEACHERS’ PERCEPTION OF RELIGIOUS IDENTITY INTERMS OF DIFFERENT IDENTITY TYPES

İrem Namlı ALTINTAŞ
Ömer ÇELİKKOL
Hüseyin MERTOL
Journal
IOJET
Pages
960–974
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Besides, it was found out that prospective teachers’ ethnic and moral identity perceptions did not correlate with their religious identity perceptions, however, their political, national, and sexual identity perceptions predicted their religious identity.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Identity distinguishes an individual from other individuals, but it also unites individuals with other individuals with similar characteristics.
📊
Key Findings & Data:To this end, the study enrolled 78 male and 228 female students from three different departments (Social Studies Teaching, Classroom Teaching, and Science Teaching) of the Faculty of Education in a state university in Turkey.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Besides, it was found out that prospective teachers’ ethnic and moral identity perceptions did not correlate with their religious identity perceptions, however, their political, national, and sexual identity perceptions predicted their religious identity.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2016 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Identity distinguishes an individual from other individuals, but it also unites individuals with other individuals with similar characteristics. This study aims to investigate the religious identity perception of prospective teachers. To this end, the study enrolled 78 male and 228 female students from three different departments (Social Studies Teaching, Classroom Teaching, and Science Teaching) of the Faculty of Education in a state university in Turkey. The data were collected via “The identity Attitudes Scale” developed by Yazıcı (2016), and “The moral Identity Questionnaire”, adapted to Turkish by Sarıçam and Çelik (2018). The study employed the relational screening research design, one of the qualitative research models. In the analysis of the data, T-test and ANOVA were utilized to analyze the variables of identity types in terms of socioeconomic backgrounds and gender types. Also, multiple regression analysis was used to explore to what extent identity types predicted religious identity. The results revealed that religious identity perceptions differed depending on socioeconomic levels but not on gender. Besides, it was found out that prospective teachers’ ethnic and moral identity perceptions did not correlate with their religious identity perceptions, however, their political, national, and sexual identity perceptions predicted their religious identity.

🔖

Cite This Article

ALTINTAŞ, İ. N., ÇELİKKOL, Ö., MERTOL, H. (2022). PROSPECTIVE TEACHERS’ PERCEPTION OF RELIGIOUS IDENTITY INTERMS OF DIFFERENT IDENTITY TYPES. IOJET, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 2, 960–974. https://ajindex.com/articles/542146

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (24)

  1. Akdemir, A. M. (2004). Küreselleşme ve kültürel kimlik sorunu. Atatürk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 3(1). Akıncı, M.-A. (2014). Fransa'daki Türk Göçmenlerinin Etnik ve Dinî Kimlik Algıları. Bilg, 70, 29-58.
  2. Anderson, B. (2011). Hayali cemaatler milliyetçiliği kökenleri ve yaylması (Çev. İ. Savaşır). İstanbul:
  3. Metis Yayınları.
  4. Aydın, S. (1998). Kimlik sorunu, ulusallık ve" Türk kimliği". Öteki Yayınevi.
  5. Bauman, Z., & May, T. (1999). Sosyolojik düşünmek. (Çev. A. E. Pilgir). Ayrıntı Yayınları.
  6. Bulut, M. (2010). Öğrencilerin dini inançları ve kimlikleri ile siyasal tercihlerinin ilişkisi. Antropoloji S 24 115-132
  7. Büyüköztürk, Ş., Çakmak, Kılıç, E., Akgün, E. Ö, Karadeniz, Ş. ve Demirel, F. (2011). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri. Ankara:
  8. Pegem Akademi. Chambers, I. (2005). Göç kültür, kimlik. (Çev. İ. Türkmen & M. Beşikçi). İstanbul:
  9. Ayrıntı Yayınları.
  10. Connolly, W. E. (1995). Kimlik ve farklılık. Siyasetin Açmazlarına Dair Demokratik Çözüm Önerileri,(Çev. Ferma Lekesizalın), İstanbul:
  11. Ayrıntı Yayınları Coşkun, A. (2003). “Din ve Kimlik”. M.Ü. İlâhiyat Fakültesi Dergisi. S.24:5-23.
  12. Dağı, Z. (2002). Kimlik, milliyetçilik ve dış politika: Rusya'nın dönüşümü. Boyut Kitapları. Fabian, B., & Fordyce, D. (1990). The elements of moral philosophy. Georg Olms Verlag. Giddens, A., & Sutton, P. W. (2014). Sosyolojide temel kavramlar (Ç. A. Esgin, Trans.). Ankara:
  13. Phoenix Yayınevi.
  14. Güngör, E. (2010). Değerler psikolojisi üzerinde araştırmalar. Ankara:
  15. Ötüken Yayınları.
  16. Gürhan, N. (2010). Toplumsal Cinsiyet Ve Din. Şarkiyat, (4), 58-80.
  17. Herve-Leger, D. (2000). Religion as a Chain of Memory. Cambridge: Polity Press. Kartopu, s., & Hacıkeleşoğlu, h. (2016). Dindarlık eğiliminin kimlik duygusu kazanımındaki rolü. Akademik Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi (29), 244-268.
  18. Kılıçbay, M. A. (2007).
  19. Kimlikler Okyanusu, Doğu Batı, S. 23 161-168.
  20. Kırac, F. (2014). Dindar Eşcinsel Bireyin Manevi Ve Cinsel Kimlik İkilemi: Müslüman Gay Ve Biseksüel Erkek Örneklem. Journal of International Social Research, 7(35), 464- 474. Kocabıyık, O. O. (2014). Benlik ve ahlaki kimlik. Değerler Eğitimi Dergisi, 12(27), 261-280.
  21. Kuçuradi, İ. (2018). İnsan ve değerleri. Ankara:
  22. Türkiye Felsefe Kurumu. Kurt, A. (2009). Dindarlığı etkileyen faktörler. Uludağ Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi, 18(2), 1-26.
  23. Kurubaş, E. (2008). Etnik sorunlar: ulus-devlet ve etnik gruplar arasındaki varoluşsal ilişki. Doğu BATI Dergisi, S. 44, 11-42.
  24. Mandel, H. (2009). Configurations of gender inequality: th