Journals / IOJET / 2022 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 2

DEVELOPMENT OF MICROPLASTIC POLLUTION AWARENESS SCALE FOR PROSPECTIVE SCIENCE AND BIOLOGY TEACHERS

Journal
IOJET
Pages
852–870
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The overall reliability coefficient of the scale was determined as 81, the value of which is considered to be of high level reliability.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The objective of this study is to develop a scale to measure science and biology teacher candidates' awareness of micro-plastic pollution.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The sample group consists of 586 participants from 4 universities who are currently enrolled in science and biology teaching programmes. “Microplastic Pollution Awareness Scale (MPAS)" used as data collection tool developed by the researcher.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The overall reliability coefficient of the scale was determined as 81, the value of which is considered to be of high level reliability.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The objective of this study is to develop a scale to measure science and biology teacher candidates' awareness of micro-plastic pollution. The sample group consists of 586 participants from 4 universities who are currently enrolled in science and biology teaching programmes. “Microplastic Pollution Awareness Scale (MPAS)" used as data collection tool developed by the researcher. EFA was applied to the data obtained from the application, it was determined that the scale had a 3-factor structure, and that the factors made up 49.57% of the total variance in general. DFA was applied to verify the obtained factor structure. According to the DFA results; χ2/df is perfect harmony; RMSEA, SRMR, CFI, GFI and NNFI are good/perfect harmony; AGFI and NFI are acceptable harmony. The overall reliability coefficient of the scale was determined as 81, the value of which is considered to be of high level reliability. MKFÖ, which is a likert scale, consists of a total of 14 items, including 5 negative and 9 positive items. The maximum score that can be obtained from the scale is determined as 28, and the score obtained from the scale is in direct proportion with the level of awareness of the individual about microplastic pollution.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÜLEŞİR, T., GÜL, A. (2022). DEVELOPMENT OF MICROPLASTIC POLLUTION AWARENESS SCALE FOR PROSPECTIVE SCIENCE AND BIOLOGY TEACHERS. IOJET, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 2, 852–870. https://ajindex.com/articles/542142

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Andrady, A. L. (2011). Microplastics in the marine environment. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 62(8), 1596-1605.
  2. Betts, K. (2008). Why small plastic particles may pose a big problem in the oceans. Environmental Science & Technology, 42(24), 8995. Bravo Rebolledo, E. L., van Franeker, J. A., Jansen, O. E., & Brasseur, S. M. (2013). Plastic ingestion by harbour seals (Phoca vitulina) in The Netherlands. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 67(1), 200-202.
  3. Browne, M. A., Dissanayake, A., Galloway, T. S., Lowe, D. M., & Thompson, R. C. (2008). Ingested microscopic plastic translocates to the circulatory system of the mussel, Mytilus edulis (L.). Environmental Science & Technology, 42, 5026-5031.
  4. Browne, M. W. & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In: Bollen, Bursal, M. (2017). SPSS ile temel veri analizleri. Ankara:
  5. Anı. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2019). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı-İstatistik, araştırma deseni SPSS uygulamaları ve yorum. Ankara:
  6. Pegem Akademi. Byrne, B. M. (2009). Estructural equation modelling with AMOS. Routledge, New York, NY: Basic Concepts, Applications and Programming. Ceylan, B. (2017). Atık sulardaki mikroplastik kirliliğinin incelenmesi. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Sakarya Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Sakarya. Cole, M.,Lindeque, P., Fileman, E., Halsband, C., Goodhead, R., Moger, J., & Galloway, Combined Effects of UV Exposure Duration and Mechanical Abrasion on Microplastic Fragmentation by Polymer Type. Environmental Science & Technology, 51(8), 4368-4376.
  7. Çokluk, Ö., Şekercioğlu, G. ve Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2010). Sosyal bilimler için çok değişkenli istatistik SPSS ve LISREL uygulamaları. Ankara:
  8. Pegem Akademi. Çokluk, Ö., Şekercioğlu, G., & Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2014). Sosyal Bilimler için çok değişkenli istatistik SPSS ve LISREL uygulamaları. Ankara:
  9. Pegem Akademi. De Witte, B., Devriese, L., Bekaert, K., Hoffman, S., Vandermeersch, G., Cooreman, K., & Robbens, J. (2014). Quality assessment of the blue mussel (Mytilus edulis): Comparison between commercial and wild types. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 85(1), 146-155.
  10. Desforges, J. P., Galbraith, M., & Ross, P. S. (2015). Ingestion of microplasticsby zooplankton in the Northeast Pacific Ocean. Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 69(3), 320-330. Dessì, C., Okoffo, E. D., O’Brien, J. W., Gallen, M., Samanipour, S., Kaserzon, S.,. & Thomas, K. V. (2021). Plastics contamination of store-bought rice. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 125778. do Sul, J. A. I., C