Journals / IOJET / 2022 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 2

OUT OF SCHOOL YOUTH REFLECTION ON PARTICIPATION IN DECISION MAKING ON IMPLEMENTATION OF SCHOOL AGRICULTURE PROGRAMME

Journal
IOJET
Pages
637–660
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Thus, the inclusion of feedback from the out of school youth and elements of the strategies developed in the review of school agriculture programme would improve its effectiveness in attaining intended objectives.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Secondary school agriculture programme is meant among other benefits to prepare youth in attaining self-reliance using vocational skills gained, in the post-schooling period as they transition to adulthood.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In the feedback, the out of school youth rated their level of participation in decision making on implementation at a mean score of 6 out of 10 indicating that there is still room for improvement.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Thus, the inclusion of feedback from the out of school youth and elements of the strategies developed in the review of school agriculture programme would improve its effectiveness in attaining intended objectives.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Secondary school agriculture programme is meant among other benefits to prepare youth in attaining self-reliance using vocational skills gained, in the post-schooling period as they transition to adulthood. A study was done to determine reflection of out of school youth on participation in decision-making on implementation of the programme in an effort to establish measures to improve its outcomes. In the feedback, the out of school youth rated their level of participation in decision making on implementation at a mean score of 6 out of 10 indicating that there is still room for improvement. The out of school youth rated as very important the five strategies proposed to enhance their engagement in decision making on implementation. The strategies 4 and 6 were ranked more significantly very important thereby standing out from the rest. Strategy 4, states that if school administration could listen to the voices of youth it will build confidence for free discussions on the challenges faced in implementation. Strategy 6 advocates for the inclusion of youth in decision making on the use of the school farm to enable them air their views on its proper utilization as a training facility rather than being used to administer punishment to errant students. There was a strong positive correlation between the level of participation in decision making and the level of implementation of the school agriculture curriculum. The high rating of strategies proposed suggests the need to address the pertinent issues in them so as to enhance participation of youth in decision making on implementation for improved outcome. Thus, the inclusion of feedback from the out of school youth and elements of the strategies developed in the review of school agriculture programme would improve its effectiveness in attaining intended objectives.

🔖

Cite This Article

NYANG'AU, M. K., OCHOLA, W. A., MAOBE, S. N. (2022). OUT OF SCHOOL YOUTH REFLECTION ON PARTICIPATION IN DECISION MAKING ON IMPLEMENTATION OF SCHOOL AGRICULTURE PROGRAMME. IOJET, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 2, 637–660. https://ajindex.com/articles/542115

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Adesina, T. K., and Eforuoku, F. (2016). Determinants of participation of Youth-inAgriculture programme in Ondo State, Nigeria. Journal of Agricultural Extension, 20(2): 104-117
  2. Akiva, T., Kai, C. S., & Smith, C. (2014). Involving Youth in Program Decision-Making: How Common and What Might it Do for Youth? Journal of Youth and Adolescence. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-014-0183-y
  3. Buijs, G. J. (2009). Better schools through health: Networking for health promoting schools in Europe. European Journal of Education, 44, 507–520.
  4. Charles, A. & Haines, K. (2014). Measuring young people’s participation in decision making: What young people say. International Journal of Children’s Rights, 22(3), 641–659. https://doi.org/10.1163/15718182-55680022.
  5. Chemjor, E. (2016). Factors influencing the choice of agriculture subject by boys and girls in public secondary schools in Kajiado County, Kenya. M.Sc. Research Project, University of Nairobi, 112p. Cohen, L. & Manion, L.& Morrison, K. (2007). Research Methods in Education. Education (Vol. 55). http://doi.org/10.111/j.1467-8527.00388_4.x
  6. Croom Helm Ltd, London. De Acedo Lizárraga, M. L. S., De Acedo Baquedano, M. T. S., & Cardelle-Elawar, M. (2007). Factors that affect decision making: Gender and age differences. International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy, 7(3), 381–391.
  7. Inegbedion, G & Islam, M. Md. (2019). Youth Motivations to Study Agriculture in Tertiary Institutions. The journal of Agricultural Education and Extension https://doi.org/10.1080/1389224X.2020.1773285
  8. Jaetzold, R. & Schmidt, H.(1992). Farm management Handbook of Kenya: Natural Conditions and Farm Management Information. Volume II/A. West Kenya (Nyanza and Western Provinces). Ministry of Agriculture, Kenya, in Cooperation with the German Agricultural Team (GAT) of German Agency for Technical Cooperation (GTZ), Nairobi, Kenya. 408 p. Kathuri, N. J. & Pals, D. A. (1993).
  9. Introduction to research. Njoro, Kenya: Educational Media centre, Egerton University. Kibett, J.K. (2002). Effect of project based learning-on student performance in secondary school agriculture (Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis). Njoro, Kenya: Egerton University. Kirimi, D. K. (2015).Influence of Choice of AgricultureSubjectAmong Public Secondary School Students in Kibirichia Division Buuri Sub-County, Kenya Unpublished Thesis, University of Nairobi, Kenya. Konyango JJJO (2010). An Analysis of the Implementation of Education Policies Influencing Secondary school Agriculture in K