Journals / IOJET / 2022 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 1

AN INVESTIGATION OF STUDENTS’ QUANTITATIVE REASONING THROUGH MODELING PROCESS

Journal
IOJET
Pages
123–141
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The findings reveal significant changes in students' quantitative reasoning structures.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Quantitative reasoning is defined as reasoning about relationships between items, measurements of objects, and quantities rather than numbers.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In the development of quantitative thinking, problems based on daily life experiences play a significant role.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The findings reveal significant changes in students' quantitative reasoning structures.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Quantitative reasoning is defined as reasoning about relationships between items, measurements of objects, and quantities rather than numbers. Both in the transition from arithmetic to algebra and in the problem-solving process, quantitative reasoning is seen as a critical instrument for the development of students' mathematical skills. In the development of quantitative thinking, problems based on daily life experiences play a significant role. The mathematical modeling process is critical in generating mathematical solutions to challenges encountered in everyday life. The goal of this study is to look at how students' quantitative reasoning structures change over time as a result of modeling. A case study was used to assess the research's reasoning process. The study included students with poor, moderate, and strong mathematical reasoning abilities. Over the course of five weeks, the participants were exposed to the modeling process as a group once a week. Clinical interviews with the students were done before and after the modeling process in the study. The modeling process was recorded, observation notes were gathered, and the students' solution sheets were collected. The study's data analysis were carried out in two stages: during data collection and after data collection. The findings reveal significant changes in students' quantitative reasoning structures. The study makes crucial recommendations for both theoretical and practical research.

🔖

Cite This Article

YENMEZ, A. A. (2022). AN INVESTIGATION OF STUDENTS’ QUANTITATIVE REASONING THROUGH MODELING PROCESS. IOJET, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 1, 123–141. https://ajindex.com/articles/542108

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (7)

  1. Agustin, M. Z., Agustin, M., Brunkow, P. and Thomas, S. (2012). Developing quantitative reasoning: Will taking traditional math courses suffice? An empirical study. The Journal of General Education, 61(4), 305-313.
  2. Berry, J. S., & Houstan, S. K. (1995). Mathematical modelling. London: Edward Arnold. Blum, W. (2002). ICMI Study 14: Applications and modelling in mathematics education - Discussion document. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 51, 149-171. doi: 10.1023/A:1022435827400 Blum, W., & Leiß, D. (2007). How do teachers deal with modeling problems? In C. Haines, P. Galbraith, W. Blum & S. Khan (Eds.), Mathematical modeling (ICTMA 12): Education, engineering and economics (pp. 222–231). Chichester: Horwood Publishing. Borromeo- Ferri, R. (2006). Theoretical and empirical differentiations of phases in the modelling process. Zentralblatt für Didaktik der Mathematik, 38(2), 86-95. doi: 10.1007/BF02655883. Carlson, M., & Oehrtman, M. (2005). Key aspects of knowing and learning the concept of function. Research Sampler Series, 9, The Mathematical Association of America Notes Online. Retrieved September 16, 2020, from http://www.maa.org/t_ and_l/sampler/rs_9.html. Chinnappan, M. (2010). Cognitive load and modelling of an algebra problem. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 22(2), 8-23.
  3. Ellis, A. B. (2007). The influence of reasoning with emergent quantities on students’ generalizations. Cognition and Instruction, 25(4), 439–478.
  4. Erbaş, A. K., Çetinkaya, B., Alacacı, C., Çakıroğlu, E., Aydoğan Yenmez, A., Şen Zeytun, A., Korkmaz, H., Kertil, M., Didiş, M., Baş, S. & Şahin, Z. (2016). Lise matematik konuları için günlük hayattan modelleme soruları. Ankara:
  5. Türkiye Bilimler Akademisi. Gall, M., Gall, J.P., Borg, W.R. (2007). Educational Research: An Introduction (8th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson. Gerring, J. (2007). Case study research: principles and practices. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  6. Haines, C. R., & Crouch, R. (2010). Remarks on a modeling cycle and interpreting behaviours. In R. Lesh, P. Galbraith, C., R. Haines & A. Hurford (Eds.), Modelig students’mathematical modeling competencies (ICTMA 13) (pp. 145-154). New York: Springer. Harel, G. (2013). The Kaputian program and its relation to DNR-based instruction: A common commitment to the development of mathematics with meaning, In M. Fried and T. Dreyfus (Eds.), The SimCalc vision and contribution (pp. 438-448).
  7. Springer. Kabael, T., & Akın, A. (2016). Problem solving strategies and qua