Journals / IOJET / 2022 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 1

EXAMINATION OF CLASSROOM TEACHERS’ 21st CENTURY TEACHING SKILLS

Journal
IOJET
Pages
432–448
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The significant differentiation in favor of those who willingly choose the teaching profession in all sub-dimensions according to the vocational preference variable showed the importance of the professional interest and ability in the success of applying the 21st century skills required by the profession.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In recent years, the rapid developments in information and communication technologies have impacted education systems immensely.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The aim of this study was to determine the level of use of the 21st century teacher skills required by the age of classroom teachers and to examine the level of use of these skills in terms of gender, graduation status and professional preference variables.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The significant differentiation in favor of those who willingly choose the teaching profession in all sub-dimensions according to the vocational preference variable showed the importance of the professional interest and ability in the success of applying the 21st century skills required by the profession.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2021 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In recent years, the rapid developments in information and communication technologies have impacted education systems immensely. These developments not only made various updates in the education programs, but also brought up the skills that the teachers who train the learners of the new millennium should have. The aim of this study was to determine the level of use of the 21st century teacher skills required by the age of classroom teachers and to examine the level of use of these skills in terms of gender, graduation status and professional preference variables. In the study, a cross-sectional survey model, a quantitative research method, was adapted. The data were collected via “21. Century Learner and Teacher Skills Use Scale” developed by Göksun (2021). The participants were composed of 269 primary school teachers selected by simple random sampling method. The collected data were analyzed using the SPSS 22.0 program. Since the research data did not show a normal distribution, Mann-Whitney U tests were used for two-category variables, and KruskalWallis tests were used for three or more categories. The results revealed that the classroom teachers' use of 21st century teacher skills was at a good level. It was also observed that the highest level of use among the sub-dimensions of 21st century teacher skills belonged to "approving skills"; and there was a significant difference in 21st century teacher skills subdimensions according to gender, graduation status and professional preference. The significant differentiation in favor of those who willingly choose the teaching profession in all sub-dimensions according to the vocational preference variable showed the importance of the professional interest and ability in the success of applying the 21st century skills required by the profession.

🔖

Cite This Article

KARALI, Y., COŞANAY, G. (2022). EXAMINATION OF CLASSROOM TEACHERS’ 21st CENTURY TEACHING SKILLS. IOJET, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 1, 432–448. https://ajindex.com/articles/542090

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Adıgüzel, A., & Genç, İ. Y. (2012). Evaluation of teachers’ instructional technologies integration skills: A qualitative need analysis for new pedagogical approaches. Necatibey Faculty of Education, Electronic Journal of Science and Mathematics Education (EFMED), 6(1), 265-286.
  2. Akçamete, G., Kaner, S., & Sucuoğlu, B. (2001). Öğretmenlerde tükenmişlik iş doyumu ve kişilik. Ankara:
  3. Nobel. Akdemir, A. S. (2013). A history of teacher training programmes and their problems ın Turkey. TurkishStudies - International Periodical For The Languages, Literature and History of Turkish or Turkic, 8 (12), 15-28.
  4. Aktürk, A. O. (2012). Analysis of attitudes of preservice teachers towards learning according to the reasons for choosing the teaching profession and their academic achivements. Ahi Evran University Journol of Kırşehir Education Faculty, 13(3), 283-297.
  5. Akyüz, Y. (1999). Türk Eğitim Tarihi. İstanbul:
  6. Alfa Aktüel Kitapevleri. Aliyev, P. (2008). An ınvestigation on relationships between university field preference and five factor personality traits with sex roles. (Unpublished master's thesis), İstanbul University Al Khazaleh, S. (2021). The effect of digital reading on EFL learners' reading comprehensıon. International Journal of Education, Technology and Science, 1(1), ) 59–70.
  7. Anagün, Ş. S., Atalay, N., Kılıç, Z., & Yaşar, S. (2016). the development of a 21st century skills and competences scale directed at teaching candidates: Validity and reliability study. Pamukkale University Journal of Education Faculty. 40(40), 160-175.
  8. Arslan, S., & Özpınar, İ. (2008). Teachers Qualifications: Comparison between primary school curriculum expectations and teachers acquisitions ın education faculties. Necatibey Faculty of Education, Electronic Journal of Science and Mathematics Education. 2(1), 38-63.
  9. Aslan, H. (2011). Sınıf yönetiminin temel kavramları. R. Sarpkaya içinde, Sınıf Yönetimi (s. 1-24). Ankara:
  10. İhtiyaç Yayıncılık. Atılgan, D. (2006). Changing infrmation services in the communication age. 1. Uluslararası Bilgi Hizmetleri Sempozyumu:Unpublished conference paper. İstanbul.
  11. Atilla, H., & Ün, M. B. (2018). National and transnational social movements and new ınformation and communication technologies. Ankara University SBF Journal. 73(3), 787-809.
  12. Aydemir, H., Karalı, Y., & Coşanay, G. (2020). Investıgatıon of socıal studıes teacher candıdates' 21st century teachıng and learner skılls. International Journal of Social Sciences Academy. (4), 1199-1214.
  13. Bernhardt, P. E