Journals / International Online Journal of Primary Education / 2020 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 2

THE EFFECTS OF EXTRINSIC AND INTRINSIC FACTORS ON TEACHERS’ JOB SATISFACTION IN TALIS 2018

Pages
244–259
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results indicated that teachers’ satisfaction with the environment had a positive effect on satisfaction with the profession, which is highest in Finland compared to Turkey and Italy.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Investigating whether the effects of extrinsic and intrinsic factors on teachers’ dissatisfaction with the teaching profession show variation between countries is crucial, especially given the significant impact on quality of instruction, which is also associated with student performance.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this respect, the main aim of this study is to reveal the effects of a group of variables categorized as extrinsic and intrinsic factors and covered in OECD’s 2018 Teaching and Learning International Survey (TALIS).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results indicated that teachers’ satisfaction with the environment had a positive effect on satisfaction with the profession, which is highest in Finland compared to Turkey and Italy.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2018 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Investigating whether the effects of extrinsic and intrinsic factors on teachers’ dissatisfaction with the teaching profession show variation between countries is crucial, especially given the significant impact on quality of instruction, which is also associated with student performance. In this respect, the main aim of this study is to reveal the effects of a group of variables categorized as extrinsic and intrinsic factors and covered in OECD’s 2018 Teaching and Learning International Survey (TALIS). These factors include teacher-student relations, perceived value of teachers in their society, the participation of stakeholders in school decisions, teacher cooperation, teacher salary satisfaction, teacher gender, socioeconomic status (SES) composition of the class, teacher workload, and this study examines TALIS results from Finland, Italy, and Turkey. Structural equation modelling (SEM) were carried out to reveal relationships between extrinsic factors and teacher satisfaction with the profession, to investigate the effects of extrinsic and intrinsic factors on the dimensions of teachers’ satisfaction, and to reveal relationships among the dimensions of teacher satisfaction. In addition, the probability of having dissatisfied teachers with their jobs for each country were estimated by using two consecutive multiple logistic regressions. The results indicated that teachers’ satisfaction with the environment had a positive effect on satisfaction with the profession, which is highest in Finland compared to Turkey and Italy. In addition, when a group of variables are controlled for, teachers’ dissatisfaction with the profession was highest in Finland among the three countries and lowest in Turkey.

🔖

Cite This Article

CEYLAN, E., ÖZBAL, E. Ö. (2022). THE EFFECTS OF EXTRINSIC AND INTRINSIC FACTORS ON TEACHERS’ JOB SATISFACTION IN TALIS 2018. International Online Journal of Primary Education, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 2, 244–259. https://ajindex.com/articles/542085

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Ainley, J., & Carstens, R. (2018). Teaching and learning international survey (TALIS) 2018 Conceptual framework”, OECD Education Working Papers, No. 187, OECD Publishing, Paris. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/799337c2-en
  2. Baughman, K. S. (1996). Increasing teacher job satisfaction: A study of the changing role of the secondary principal. American Secondary Education, 24(3), 19-22.
  3. Bolam, R., & McMahon, A. (2004). Literature definitions and models: Towards a conceptual map”, in Day, C. and J. Sachs (eds.), International Handbook on the Continuing Professional Development of Teachers, Open University Press,
  4. Maidenhead. Botha, H. (2007). Relationships between job variables: The moderating effects of support and the mediating effects of job satisfaction, affective commitment and continuance commitment in the support worker industry. Unpublished Doctorate Thesis, The University of Waikato. Collie, R. J., Shapka, J. D., & Perry, N. E. (2012). School climate and social emotional learning: Predicting teacher stress, job satisfaction, and teaching efficacy. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(4), 1189-1204.
  5. Dorozynska, A. (2016). Teacher job satisfaction primary schools the relation to work environment. Göteborgs University. Durksen, T. L., Klassen, R. M., & Daniels, L. M. (2017). Motivation and collaboration: The keys to a developmental framework for teachers’ professional learning. Teaching and teacher education, 67, 53-66.
  6. Ferguson, K., Frost, L., & Hall, D. (2012). Predicting teacher anxiety, depression, and job satisfaction. Journal of Teaching and Learning, 8, 27–42.
  7. Geiger, T., & Pivovarova, M. (2018). The effects of working conditions on teacher retention. Teachers and Teaching, 24(6), 604–625.
  8. Gkolia, A., Belias, D., & Koustelios, A. (2014). Teacher's job satisfaction and selfefficacy: A review. European Scientific Journal, 10 (22), 321-342.
  9. Hanushek, E. A., & Rivkin, S. G. (2010). Generalizations about using value-added measures of teacher quality. American Economic Review, 100(2), 267-71, http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/aer.100.2.267
  10. Hauber, F. A., & Bruininks, R. H. (1986). Intrinsic and extrinsic job satisfaction among direct-care staff in residential facilities for mentally retarded people. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 46(1), 95-105.
  11. Hirschfeld, R. R. (2000). Does revising the intrinsic and extrinsic subscales of the Minnesota Satisfaction Questionnaire short form make a difference? Educational and Psychological Measurement, 60(2), 255-270, http