Journals / International Online Journal of Primary Education / 2020 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 2

EARLY CHILDHOOD PRESERVICE TEACHERS’ PERCEPTIONS ON CHILDREN’S PLAY

Pages
128–143
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The survey results demonstrated that concept of play does not have a shared definition.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of this participant selection model mixed methods study was to investigate early childhood education preservice teachers’ perceptions on children’s play.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Within the program, 241 students at different stages within the program (Cohort I, Cohort II, Cohort III, Cohort IV, and Cohort V) participated in the quantitative phase of the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The survey results demonstrated that concept of play does not have a shared definition.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The purpose of this participant selection model mixed methods study was to investigate early childhood education preservice teachers’ perceptions on children’s play. The study was conducted at one of the Midwestern universities’ early childhood undergraduate education program in the United States. Within the program, 241 students at different stages within the program (Cohort I, Cohort II, Cohort III, Cohort IV, and Cohort V) participated in the quantitative phase of the study. The survey results demonstrated that concept of play does not have a shared definition. Play is viewed as social and physical activity but less cognitive. It was also found that participants at earlier stages within the program are more inclusive toward play and the participants at the later stages perceive play in more rigid and strict ways. The seniors tend to be focused on a specific outcome rather than viewing play as process-oriented activity within the early childhood classroom.

🔖

Cite This Article

ZHULAMANOVA, I., RAISOR, J. (2022). EARLY CHILDHOOD PRESERVICE TEACHERS’ PERCEPTIONS ON CHILDREN’S PLAY. International Online Journal of Primary Education, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 2, 128–143. https://ajindex.com/articles/542080

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Ahn, S. Y. (2008). Exploring constructions of the meanings of play among Korean preservice kindergarten teachers. Retrieved from https://search-proquest com.proxy.library.kent.edu/docview/304183557?accountid=11835 (Order No. 3347872). Altun, Z. D. (2018). Early childhood pre-service teachers’ perspectives on play and teachers’ role. International Education Studies, 11(8), 91-97.
  2. Bassok, D., Latham, S., & Rorem, A. (2016). Is kindergarten the new first grade?. Aera Open, 2(1), https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858415616358
  3. Bergen, D. (2009). Play as the learning medium for future scientists, mathematicians, and engineers. American Journal of Play, 1(4), 413-428.
  4. Blom, M. & D’Amico, M. (2019). Play in higher education: Emergent understandings of play pedagogy for adult learners in early childhood teacher education programs. In Han M. & J.E. Johnson (Eds.), Play and curriculum (1st ed., pp. 129-161).
  5. Hamilton Books. Bodrova, E., & Leong, D. J. (2010). Curriculum and play in early child development. In Encyclopedia on Early Childhood Development. Bubikova-Moan,J., Hjetland, H. N., & Wollscheid, S. (2019). ECE teachers’ views on play-based learning: A systematic review. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 27(6), 776-800. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350293X.2019.1678717
  6. Cevher-Kalburan, N. (2015). Developing preservice teachers’ understanding of children’s risky play. Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning, 15(3), 239–260.
  7. Charko, L., Fraser, C., Jones, D., & Umangay, U. K. (2016). Faculty, candidates, and children at play: Perceptions and dissonances. In T. Brabazon & T. Brabazon (Eds.), Play: A theory of learning and change (pp. 55–70).
  8. Cham, Switzerland: Springer. Copple, C., & Bredekamp, S. (2009). Developmentally appropriate practices in early childhood programs serving children from birth through age 8. (3rd ed.). Washington, DC: NAEYC. Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE. Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V.L. (2007). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. (2nd. ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications. Inc. Donaghue, H. (2003). An instrument to elicit teachers’ beliefs and assumptions. English Language Teaching Journal, 57, 344-351. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/57.4.344
  9. Eberle, S. G. (2014). The elements of play: Toward a philosophy and a definition of play. American Journal of Play, 6(2), 214- 233. Fajet, W., Bello, M., Leftwich, S. A., Mesl