Journals / International Online Journal of Primary Education / 2020 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 2

A BLOOM’S TAXONOMY-BASED ANALAYSIS OF 9th and 10th GRADES ENGLISH LANGUAGE TEXTBOOKS’ FINAL EXAMINATIONS AND REVISION QUESTIONS

Pages
197–211
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Results indicated that the questions of teachers' final exams’ papers based on Bloom's taxonomy, remembering level had the highest relative average with a percentage of (30.75 %) and the analysis level had the lowest level with a percentage of (4.07%).

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study aimed to identify and analyze the patterns of final exam questions prepared by English teachers for the 9th and 10th grades and to analyze all the revision questions presented in the English language textbooks in Jordan, based on Bloom's taxonomy to determine the nature and types of these questions.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The sample of the study consisted of (63) English language teachers (31 male and 32 female teachers), the English language revision questions within the 9th and 10th grade textbooks, and questions included in the 1st semester final exams in 2018 for 9th and 10th grades.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Results indicated that the questions of teachers' final exams’ papers based on Bloom's taxonomy, remembering level had the highest relative average with a percentage of (30.75 %) and the analysis level had the lowest level with a percentage of (4.07%).
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2018 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This study aimed to identify and analyze the patterns of final exam questions prepared by English teachers for the 9th and 10th grades and to analyze all the revision questions presented in the English language textbooks in Jordan, based on Bloom's taxonomy to determine the nature and types of these questions. The sample of the study consisted of (63) English language teachers (31 male and 32 female teachers), the English language revision questions within the 9th and 10th grade textbooks, and questions included in the 1st semester final exams in 2018 for 9th and 10th grades. To achieve the goals of the study, the researchers developed an analytical card for the revision questions and the exams papers prepared by teachers. Results indicated that the questions of teachers' final exams’ papers based on Bloom's taxonomy, remembering level had the highest relative average with a percentage of (30.75 %) and the analysis level had the lowest level with a percentage of (4.07%). Results also indicated convergent percentages among the revision questions, where both the comprehension and the application levels had the highest frequencies with a percentage of (26.56%). Moreover, results indicated no statistical significant differences, at the level of analyzes, between the questions of the final exams and the textbooks revision questions. However,, statistical significant differences were indicated between the frequencies and the percentages of the analyzed questions of the final examsand the textbooks for grade 9 and grade 10 and the highest was therememberinglevel withpercentages of (17.19%) for the remembering within the textbook revision questions and (30.75%) for teachers' final exams. By way of concluding, this study highlights several recommendations, among which the Ministry of Education is advised to benefit from the results of such a study in developing the English language textbook.

🔖

Cite This Article

BAYAYDAH, A. M., ALTWEISSI, A. I. (2022). A BLOOM’S TAXONOMY-BASED ANALAYSIS OF 9th and 10th GRADES ENGLISH LANGUAGE TEXTBOOKS’ FINAL EXAMINATIONS AND REVISION QUESTIONS. International Online Journal of Primary Education, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 2, 197–211. https://ajindex.com/articles/542079

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (7)

  1. Abdelhadi, N. (2001). An introduction to educational measurement and evaluation and its use in the field of classroom teaching (2nd Ed). Amman, Jordan: Dar Wa'el for Publication. Abderrazzaq, S. (2003) Developing editorial questions formulation and exams construction skills for all educational stages. (1st ed). Cairo, Egypt: Dar Alqahirah Lilkitab. Aldhahir, Z., Tamerjian, J., & Jawdat, E. (2002). Assessment and evaluation principles in education. Cairo-Egypt: Dar Ale'lm Lilthaqafa for Publication. Alkurdi, W. (1996). Critical review for Arabic language textbooks from 7th to second secondary grades in the West Bank and Gaza Strip. Palestinian Curriculum Development Center. The Palestinian 1st Curriculum for Public Education. Ramallah, Palestine. P. 351-393.
  2. Alqatami, Y., & Alqatami, N. (2001). Teaching psychology. (1sted.). Amman, Jordan: Alshorouq Printing House for Publication. Alghareeb, R. (1981). Psychological-educational evaluation and assessment. (1st ed). Cairo, Egypt: Egyptian Anglo Library. Al-Saraireh, A. (2011). Analytical study for achievement questions' patterns among social studies and national education teachers for the 4th and 5th grade in Southern Mazar. Unpublished Master's Thesis, Mu'tah University. Alzu'bi, M. A. (2014). The extent of adaptation Bloom's taxonomy of cognitive domain in English questions included in general secondary exams. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 5(2), 67-72.
  3. Al-Wreikat, Y. A. A. S., Abdullah, B., & Kabilan, M. K. (2010). An evaluation of Jordanian EFL teachers' in service training courses teaching techniques effectiveness. English Language Teaching, 3(4), 18-27.
  4. Anderson, L. W., Krathwohl, D. R., Airasian, P., Cruikshank, K., Mayer, R., Pintrich, P., & Wittrock, M. (1992). A taxonomy for learning, teaching and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy, New York: Longman Publishing. Bani Abdelrahman, M. (2014). An analysis of the tenth grade English language textbooks questions in Jordan based on the revised edition of bloom's taxonomy. Journal of Education and Practice, 5(18), 139-151.
  5. Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives – Handbook 1 cognitive domain, London: Longman. Boit, M., Njoki, A., & Chang’ach, J. K. (2012). The influence of examinations on the stated curriculum goals. American International Journal of Contemporary Research, 2(2), 179-182.
  6. Brown J. B. (1997) Textbook evaluation form. The Language Teacher. 21(10), 15-21.
  7. Clark, L. H., & Starr, I. (1981) Secondary & middle sc