Journals / International Online Journal of Primary Education / 2021 / Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 1

SPECIALISED CONTENT KNOWLEDGE: THE CONVENTION FOR NAMING ARRAYS AND DESCRIBING EQUAL GROUPS’ PROBLEMS

Pages
19–31
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Given that there is not unanimous agreement amongst mathematics educators about naming conventions, these observations may not be surprising.Due to the sample size, broad generalisations cannot be made, but the results suggest that many teachers may have limited SCK with regards to the important mathematical area of Multiplicative Thinking (MT).

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Specialised Content Knowledge (SCK) is defined by Ball, Hoover-Thames, and Phelps (2008) as mathematical knowledge essential for effective teaching.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Data were generated from semi-structured interviews and a written diagnostic assessment quiz.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Given that there is not unanimous agreement amongst mathematics educators about naming conventions, these observations may not be surprising.Due to the sample size, broad generalisations cannot be made, but the results suggest that many teachers may have limited SCK with regards to the important mathematical area of Multiplicative Thinking (MT).
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2008 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Specialised Content Knowledge (SCK) is defined by Ball, Hoover-Thames, and Phelps (2008) as mathematical knowledge essential for effective teaching. It is knowledge of mathematics that is beyond knowledge which would be required outside of teaching; for instance, the capacity to determine what misconception(s) may lie behind an error in calculation. Such knowledge should be core business of teachers of mathematics, and any perceived shortfall in SCK viewed as problematic. The research reported on here is part of a large study about multiplicative thinking involving approximately two thousand children between nine and twelve years of age and their teachers. Data were generated from semi-structured interviews and a written diagnostic assessment quiz. As part of that large project, forty-four Australian and New Zealand primary and middle school teachers were asked to respond to student work related to multiplicative thinking, particularly to concepts of numbers of equal groups and commutativity. Participants’ responses reflected confusion about a pivotal piece of SCK, the convention for naming arrays. As well, questionable assumptions about the children’s work samples were made. Given that there is not unanimous agreement amongst mathematics educators about naming conventions, these observations may not be surprising.Due to the sample size, broad generalisations cannot be made, but the results suggest that many teachers may have limited SCK with regards to the important mathematical area of Multiplicative Thinking (MT).

🔖

Cite This Article

HURST, C., HURRELL, D. (2022). SPECIALISED CONTENT KNOWLEDGE: THE CONVENTION FOR NAMING ARRAYS AND DESCRIBING EQUAL GROUPS’ PROBLEMS. International Online Journal of Primary Education, Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 1, 19–31. https://ajindex.com/articles/542042

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Anthony, G., & Walshaw, M. (2002). Swaps and switches: Students’ understandings of commutativity. In B. Barton, K. C. Irwin, M. Pfannkuch, & M. O. J. Thomas (Eds.). Mathematics Education in the South Pacific (Proceedings of the 25th annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, Auckland, (pp. 91-99). Sydney: MERGA. Askew, M. (2018). Multiplicative reasoning: teaching primary pupils in ways that focus on functional relations. The Curriculum Journal, 29(3), 406-423.
  2. Ball, D. L., Hoover-Thames, M., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389-407.
  3. Barmby, P., Harries, T., Higgins, S., & Suggate, J. (2009). The array representation and primary children’s understanding and reasoning in multiplication. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 70, 217-241.
  4. Barmby, P., Harries, T., & Higgins, S. (2010). Teaching for understanding/understanding for teaching. In I. Thompson (Ed.), Issues in teaching numeracy in primary schools, (2nd. ed.). Maidenhead, U.K.: Open University Press.
  5. Benson, C. C., Wall, J. T., & Malm, C. (2013). The distributive property in Grade 3? Teaching Children Mathematics, 19(8), 498-506.
  6. Behr, M., Harel, G., Post, T., & Lesh, R. (1994). Units of quantity: A conceptual basis common to additive and multiplicative structures. In G. Harel & J. Confrey (Eds.). The development of multiplicative reasoning in the learning of mathematics (pp. 121-176).
  7. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
  8. Boaler, J., Chen, L., Williams, C., & Cordero, M. V. (2016). Seeing as understanding: The Importance of visual mathematics for our brain and learning. Journal of Applied and Computational Mathematics, 5, 1-6.
  9. Brown, G., & Quinn, R. J. (2006). Algebra students’ difficulty with fractions: An error analysis. Australian Mathematics Teacher, 62, 28-40.
  10. Bruner, J. S. (1966). Toward a theory of instruction. Cambridge, MA: Belkapp Press.
  11. Clements, D., & Sarama, J. (2019) From Children’s Thinking to Curriculum to Professional Development to Scale: Research Impacting Early Maths Practice. In G. Hine, S. Blackley, & A. Cooke (Eds.). Mathematics Education Research: Impacting Practice (Proceedings of the 42nd annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia) pp. 36-48. Perth: MERGA. Retrieved from: https://merga.net.au/Public/Publications/Annual_Conference_Proceedings/2019-MERGA-conference-proceedings.aspx
  12. Confrey, J., & Smith, E. (1995). Splitti