Journals / International Online Journal of Primary Education / 2021 / Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 1

CLASSROOM TEACHERS’ VIEWS ON THE PHYSICAL LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS OF PRIMARY SCHOOLS IN TURKEY

Pages
180–192
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In light of the findings, some suggestions were have been made for primary schools in Turkey.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:School buildings with inadequate infrastructure and old-fashioned architectural styles cause problems, especially in developing countries.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The participants of the study consisted of 14 classroom teachers working in rural and urban areas.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In light of the findings, some suggestions were have been made for primary schools in Turkey.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

School buildings with inadequate infrastructure and old-fashioned architectural styles cause problems, especially in developing countries. This study aims to examine the views of primary school teachers on the physical learning environments of primary schools. A case study method was adopted in this study. The participants of the study consisted of 14 classroom teachers working in rural and urban areas. The synchronous online focus group interviews were conducted using Zoom, a commercial web conference service, as a data collection method. A content analysis method was used in the analysis of the data. The analyses of the semi-structured interviews with the classroom teachers produced four categories-i.e., planning related shortcomings, infrastructure deficiency, child-friendly schools, and the advantages of these schools. Responses of classroom teachers working in urban areas mostly focused on the crowding of schools. On the other hand, the answers from the classroom teachers working in rural areas mostly focused on the physical infrastructure of primary schools. Furthermore, suggestions from all participants pointed out that primary schools must have a more child-friendly characteristic. The physical learning environments of primary schools require compliance with the needs of modern pedagogy. In light of the findings, some suggestions were have been made for primary schools in Turkey.

🔖

Cite This Article

İRA, G. Ö., GÜLTEKİN, M. (2022). CLASSROOM TEACHERS’ VIEWS ON THE PHYSICAL LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS OF PRIMARY SCHOOLS IN TURKEY. International Online Journal of Primary Education, Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 1, 180–192. https://ajindex.com/articles/542041

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Adıgüzel, A. (2012). The validity and reliability study about school attitude scale. Electronic Journal of Social Sciences, 11(40), 30-45.
  2. Akbaba, A., & Turhan, M. (2016). Investigating teachers’ views about physical problems of primary schools (Van sample). Karadeniz Technical University Institute of Social Sciences Journal of Social Sciences. 6(12), 341-357.
  3. Bardone, A., & Gargiulo, C. (2014). Learning in twenty-first century schools: Norms and costs of school infrastructure. Inter-American Development Bank. Barrett, P., Davies, F., Zhang, Y., & Barrett, L. (2015). The impact of classroom design on pupils' learning: Final results of a holistic, multi-level analysis. Building and Environment, 89, 118-133.
  4. Başar, M. A. (2000). İlköğretim okullarının işgören ve fiziki olanakları [Employment and physical facilities of primary schools]. Pamukkale University Journal of Education, 8, 134-140.
  5. Benade, L. (2019). Flexible learning spaces: Inclusive by design? New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, 54, 53–68.
  6. Craissati, D., Devi Banerjee, U., King, L., Lansdown, G., & Smith, A. (2007). A human rights based approach to education for all. New York: United Nations Children’s Fund. Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative enquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. Creswell, J. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. California, CA: SAGE. Dejong, W. (1997). Building change into new buildings. School Administrator, 54(6), 10-13.
  7. Directorate of Strategy Development. (2015). Ministry of National Education 2015-2019 strategic plan [Millî Eğitim Bakanlığı 2015-2019 stratejik planı]. Ankara: MoNE. EDUSPACES21. (2016). Physical and architectural learning environment: Educational spaces 21. open up!. Warsaw: Center for Citizenship Education Foundation. Frith, K. (2015). Inside school design: The role of interior design in cultural change. (Unpublished doctoral thesis). Swinburne University of Technology: Melbourne, Vic. Retrieved from http://hdl. handle. net/1959.3/414201. Göçen, A., Eral S. H., & Bücük, M. H. (2020). Teacher perceptions of a 21st century classroom. International Journal of Contemporary Educational Research, 7(1), 85-98. doi: https://doi.org/10.33200/ijcer.638110
  8. Güner, F., & Kartal, H. (2020). Review of classroom teachers’ standpoints for elementary schools in the context of schools’ readiness. Education and Science, 45(203), 411-437. doi: 0.15390/EB.2020.8681 Hac