SavedAdd your journal

Journals / International Online Journal of Primary Education / 2022 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 1

TRENDS IN EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGIES ACCORDING TO ARTICLES PUBLISHED IN THE LAST 20 YEARS IN INTERNATIONAL LITERATURE

Özgen KORKMAZ
Cavit ERDOĞMUŞ
Pages
232–259
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

VOSViewer version 1.6.13 was used for analysis.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this research is to determine the trends in the field of educational technology by analyzing the bibliometric analysis of the articles about Educational Technology published in the Web of Science Core database in the last 20 years.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this framework, a bibliometric analysis of the articles on educational technology published 2000-2019 was conducted.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:VOSViewer version 1.6.13 was used for analysis.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2000-2019 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The aim of this research is to determine the trends in the field of educational technology by analyzing the bibliometric analysis of the articles about Educational Technology published in the Web of Science Core database in the last 20 years. In this framework, a bibliometric analysis of the articles on educational technology published 2000-2019 was conducted. As a result of the preliminary examination, 96 most used themes in the field of educational technology were reached. These themes are gathered under the headings of Application, Design and Environments, Measurement and Evaluation, Pedagogy and Teaching and Learning. As a result of the findings, a bibliometric analysis of a total of 25 themes was made for 5 main theme findings with the highest number of articles under each main topic. During these analyzes, the most used concepts were analyzed with each theme. VOSViewer version 1.6.13 was used for analysis.

🔖

Cite This Article

KORKMAZ, Ö., ERDOĞMUŞ, C. (2022). TRENDS IN EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGIES ACCORDING TO ARTICLES PUBLISHED IN THE LAST 20 YEARS IN INTERNATIONAL LITERATURE. International Online Journal of Primary Education, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 1, 232–259. https://ajindex.com/articles/542023

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Abt, H. A. (1993). Institutional productivities. Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 105(689), 794-798.
  2. Admiraal, W., Schenke, W., De Jong, L., Emmelot, Y., & Sligte, H. (2021). Schools as professional learning communities: what can schools do to support professional development of their teachers?. Professional Development in Education, 45(4), 684-698.
  3. Adraoui, M., Retbi, A., Idrissi, M. K., & Bennani, S. (2019). A new algorithm to detect and evaluate learning communities in social networks: Facebook groups. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (IJET), 14(23), 165-179.
  4. Anderson, T. L., & Bodner, G. M. (2008). What can we do about ‘Parker’? A case study of a good student who didn't ‘get’organic chemistry. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 9(2), 93-101.
  5. Arias Gallegos, W. L., Franco Delgado de Carpio, E. D., & Ceballos Canaza, K. D. (2019). Professional Preferences and professional identity in engineering students from a private university in Arequipa [Preferencias profesionales e identidad profesional en los estudiantes de ingenierías de una universidad privada de Arequipa]. Propósitos y representaciones, 7(2), 160-177.
  6. Arrington, C. N., Malins, J. G., Winter, R., Mencl, W. E., Pugh, K. R., & Morris, R. (2019). Examining individual differences in reading and attentional control networks utilizing an oddball fMRI task. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 38, 100674. Aquino, K. C., & Shell, S. (2020). Device usage and accessible technology needs for post-traditional students in the e-learning environment. The Journal of Continuing Higher Education, 68(2), 101-116.
  7. Avila, L., & Bailey, M. (2016). Augment your reality. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 36(1), 6-7.
  8. Aydoğdu, C., & Yardımcı, E. (2013). Accidents occurred in elementary science laboratories and teachers’ behaviour manners toward these accidents. H. U. Journal of Education, 44, 52-60.
  9. Bailey, D., Almusharraf, N., & Hatcher, R. (2021). Finding satisfaction: intrinsic motivation for synchronous and asynchronous communication in the online language learning context. Education and Information Technologies, 26(3), 2563-2583.
  10. Balgiu, B. A. (2020). The reliability and the construct validity of the Gratitude Questionnaire (GQ-6) in a sample of Romanian undergraduates. Journal of Educational Sciences & Psychology, 10(72), 101-109.
  11. Ball, R., & Tunger, D. (2006). Bibliometric analysis - A new business area for information professionals in libraries? S