SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Maden Tetkik ve Arama Dergisi / 2002 / Cilt: 125 - Sayı: 125

OOLITE AND PISOLITE OCCURRENCE WITHIN THE PLIOCENE - QUATERNARY AGE TRAVERTUNE IN MUT REGION

Eşref ATABEY
Pages
57–58
Publication Date
2002-06-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

These occurrences developed from roof, mixing grains in the splashing pool.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:There exists oolite and pisolite occurrences within travertine of Pliocene-Quaternary age at northeast of Mut (İçel).
📊
Key Findings & Data:The oolite grains are smaller than 2 mm, whereas pisolite grains are between 2 mm and 1 cm in size.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:These occurrences developed from roof, mixing grains in the splashing pool.
🔬Design:Lab & Field Experiment
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

There exists oolite and pisolite occurrences within travertine of Pliocene-Quaternary age at northeast of Mut (İçel). The oolite grains are smaller than 2 mm, whereas pisolite grains are between 2 mm and 1 cm in size. These are rounded and ellipsoidal in shape. Each oolite and pisolite grain contains a nucleus at its centre, elastics carbonate sand grain, surrounded by laminated concentric calcite layers. These occurrences developed from roof, mixing grains in the splashing pool.

🔖

Cite This Article

ATABEY, E. (2002). OOLITE AND PISOLITE OCCURRENCE WITHIN THE PLIOCENE - QUATERNARY AGE TRAVERTUNE IN MUT REGION. Maden Tetkik ve Arama Dergisi, Cilt: 125 - Sayı: 125, 57–58. https://ajindex.com/articles/54189

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Atabey, E.; Atabey, N.; Sözeri, Ş.; Islamoğlu, Y.; Hak- yemez, A.; Özçelik, N.; Sarac, G.; Ünay, E. ve Babayiğit, S., 2000a, Mut (Içel)-Karaman arası Miyosen istifinin Litostratigrafisi-kro- nostratigrafisi ve istif stratigrafik yorumu, MTA Rap. 10312 (yayımlanmamış) Atabey, E.; Atabey, N.; Hakyemez, A.; Islamoğlu, Y.; Sözeri, Ş.; Özçelik, N. N.; Saraç, G.; Ünay, E., ve Babayiğit, S., 20006, Mut-Karaman arası Miyosen havzasının litostratigrafisi ve sedimantolojisi, MTA Derg. 122, 53-72.
  2. Baker, G. ve Frostick, A. C., 1947, Pisolites and ooli- tes from some Australian caves and mines: J. Sed. Petrol. 17,39-67. ve, 1951, Pisolites, oolites and calce- rous grovvths in limestone caves at Port Cambell, Victoria, Australia. J. Sed. Petrol. 21,85-104.
  3. Braithvvaite, C. J. R., 1979, Crystal textures of recent fluvial pisolites and laminated crystalline crusts in Dyfed, South Wales, J. of Sed. Pet- rol., 49, 181-194.
  4. Donahue, J., 1965, Laboratory growth of pisolite gra- ins, J. of Sed. Petrol., 35, 251-256., 1969, Genesis of oolite and pisolite grains: An energy index, J. of Sed. Petrol., 39,1399- 1411. Esteban, M., 1976, Vadose pisolite and caliche: AAPG Bull. 60, 2048-2057.
  5. Hill, C. ve Forti, P., 1997,
  6. Cave Minerals of the world, Publ. by National Speleological Society. 462p. McGannon, JR. D. E., 1974,
  7. Primary fluvial oolites, J. of Sed. Petrol., 45, 719-727.
  8. Tekin, E. ve Ayyıldız, T., 2001, Sıcakçermik jeotermal alanındaki (Sivas KB, Türkiye) güncel traver- ten çökellerinin petrografik özellikleri, Türkiye Jeoloji Bülteni, 44,1,1-13
  9. VVright, V. P., 1981, Algal aragonite-encrusted pisoids from a lovver carboniferous schizohaline lagoon. J. of Sed. Petrol., 51, 479-489