SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Maden Tetkik ve Arama Dergisi / 2003 / Cilt: 127 - Sayı: 127

BIVALVIA FAUNA OF ANTALYA MIOCENE BASIN

Yeşim İSLAMOĞLU
Güler TANER
Pages
1–1
Publication Date
2003-08-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In the study area whereas determined species belonging to Lower and Middle Miocene are able to be correlated with Tethys, on the other hand, Central Paratethys fauna belonging to Upper Miocene are only able to correlate with Tethys fauna.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This Paper is published in Turkish edition of the Journal (MTA Dergisi )In this study, coverage of Bivalvia fauna and its systematic specialities in Antalya Miocene basin have been explained.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In the basin, 30 species of Bivalvia class obtained from Oymapınar limestone, Altınkaya formation and Aksu formation have been determined.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In the study area whereas determined species belonging to Lower and Middle Miocene are able to be correlated with Tethys, on the other hand, Central Paratethys fauna belonging to Upper Miocene are only able to correlate with Tethys fauna.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This Paper is published in Turkish edition of the Journal (MTA Dergisi )In this study, coverage of Bivalvia fauna and its systematic specialities in Antalya Miocene basin have been explained. In the basin, 30 species of Bivalvia class obtained from Oymapınar limestone, Altınkaya formation and Aksu formation have been determined. As well as systematically classification of species, stratigraphic levels and paleogeographic distributions of them have been put forward too. According to this, species of Glossus (Cytherocardia) cf. deshayesi perlongata (Kutassy 1928) and Pelecyora (Cordiopsis) polytropa nysti (d'Orbigny 1852) are peculiar to Middle Miocene and species of Cardiocardita cf. monilifera (Dujardin 1837) is peculiar to Lower Miocene. In the study area, as well as species, characteristic for Tethys such as species such as Chlamys (Aequipecten) scabrella bollenensis (Mayer 1876), Pecten fuchsi Fontannes 1878, species such as Crassostrea gryphoides (Schlotheim 1813), Loripes (Loripes) dujardini (Deshayes 1850), Carditamera (Lazariella) (Sacco 1899), Megaxinus bellardianus (Mayer 1864), Acanthocardia (Acanthocardia) turonica (Mayer 1861), Sanguinolaria (Soletellina) labordei (Basterot 1825) and Pitar (Pitar) rudis (Poli 1795) widespreading both into Tethys and into marine stages of Central Paratethys have been found. It is striking to be met by chance firstly in the study area with species such as Glossus (Cytherocardia) cf. deshayesi perlongata (Kutassy 1928), Pelecyora (Cordiopsis) polytropa nysti (d'Orbigny 1852 and Irus (Paphirus) gregarius gregarius Partsch, 1823 known beforehand to be only Central Paratethys. In the study area whereas determined species belonging to Lower and Middle Miocene are able to be correlated with Tethys, on the other hand, Central Paratethys fauna belonging to Upper Miocene are only able to correlate with Tethys fauna.

🔖

Cite This Article

İSLAMOĞLU, Y., TANER, G. (2003). BIVALVIA FAUNA OF ANTALYA MIOCENE BASIN. Maden Tetkik ve Arama Dergisi, Cilt: 127 - Sayı: 127, 1–1. https://ajindex.com/articles/54173

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Anderson, J.H., 1959, Die muschelfauna des nordwestdeutschen untermiozan, Paleontographica Abt. A, 1137 4-6, Stutgart, 61-179.
  2. Basterot, M., 1825, Description geologigue du bassin tertiaire du sud-ouest de la France, le partie, Mem.Soc.Hist.Nat., Paris. Brocchi, G., 1814, Conchiologia fossile subapennina. Texte, Milano, 241-712.
  3. Cossmann, M. ve Peyrot, A., 1912, Conchologie neogeigue de l'aguitaine, 1, Act.Soc.Linn., Bordeaux. ve, 1914, Conchiologie Neogenigue de l'Aguitaine, 3, Act. Soc. Linn., Bordeaux. Csepreghy - Meznerics, l., 1954, A keletcserhati Helveti es Tortonai fauna, Ann. Inst. Geol. Pub. Hungarici, 41/4, Budapest, 185. Deperet, G. ve Roman, F., 1902, Monographie des Pectinides Neogenes de l'Europe et des regions voisines. Mem. Soc. Geol. France, 10/26, Paris. Dollfus, G. F. ve Dautzenberg, P. H., 1904, Conchyliologie du Miocene moyen du bassin de la loire. Mem. Soc. Geol. France, 27, Paris. Dulai, A., 1996, Taxonomic composition and paleoecological features of the early Badenian (Middle Miocene) bivalve fauna of Szob (Börzsöny Mts, Hungary, Ann.His.Nat.Mus. Nationalis Hungarici, 88, Budapest, 31-56.
  4. Erünal - Erentöz, L., 1958, Mollusques du Neogene des bassins de Karaman, Adana et Hatay (Turquie), Theses. a la faculte des sciences de l'universite de Paris, le grade de docteur es sciences naturelles, Ankara, 232. Hinculov, L., 1968, Fauna Miocena din bazinul mehadia. In: bazinul mehadia studil geologic sı paleontologic, Com. de stat al Geol. Inst. Geol. Memorii, 9, Bucureşti, 73-201.
  5. Hoernes, M., 1870, Die fossilen mollusken des Tertiaren becken von Wien. Abh. Kg).Geol. Reicsanst, 2, Bivalven, Wien. İslamoğlu, Y. 2001-2002, Antalya Miyosen havzasının mollusk faunası ile stratigrafisi, Maden Tetkik ve Arama Dergisi, 123-124, Ankara, 27-58. ve Taner, G., 2003, Antalya ve Kasaba Miyosen havzalarındaki mollusk faunasının paleocoğrafik ve paleoekolojik özelliği, Maden Tetkik ve Arama Dergisi, 126, Ankara, 11-42.
  6. Kaynak, G., 1979, Revision des Arcacea et des Cardiacea du Miocene Rhodaniyen. Docum. Lab. Geol. Univ. Lyon, Lyon, 350. Kautsky, F., 1936, Die Venerides und Petricoliden des niderösterreichischen Miozans, Separatdruck aus der "BohrtechnikerZeitung, Wien, 28. Kojumdgieva, E.M. ve Strachimirov, B., 1960,
  7. Les fossiles de Bulgarie, VII, Tortonien, Academie des Sciences de Bulgarie, Sofya. Malatesta, A., 1974,
  8. Malacofauna Pliocenica umbra, Mem. per servire alla descrizione della Carta Geologica D'ltalia, 13, Roma, 498. Merklin, R.L. ve Nevessk