Journals / International Journal of Pure and Applied Sciences / 2019 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 1

Determination of Antioxidant Capacity of Flesh Fruit, around the Apple Seeds and Peel Apple in Some Apple Varieties from Isparta

Isparta’da Yetişen Bazı Elma Çeşitlerinin Meyve Eti, Kabuk ve Çekirdek Yuvasındaki Antioksidan Kapasitesinin Belirlenmesi

Pages
31–36
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The amount of antioxidant in the analysis performed by TPC method was higher than that of ABTS and DPPH method.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, the antioxidant capacities in flesh fruit, around the apple seeds and peel of apple in five different apple varieties obtained from Eğirdir district of Isparta province was determined by using ABTS, DPPH and TPC methods.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The highest antioxidant activity was found in ‘Granny Smith’.The lowest antioxidant activity was determined in ‘Pink Lady’.The amount of antioxidants in flesh fruit, peel of apple and around the apple seeds were 29.93%, 21.95%, 27.22%, respectively.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The amount of antioxidant in the analysis performed by TPC method was higher than that of ABTS and DPPH method.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:ABTS · antioksidan · DPPH

Abstract

In this study, the antioxidant capacities in flesh fruit, around the apple seeds and peel of apple in five different apple varieties obtained from Eğirdir district of Isparta province was determined by using ABTS, DPPH and TPC methods. When the results of analysis were examined, it was seen that antioxidant levels differed in terms of varieties, parts and methods. The highest antioxidant activity was found in ‘Granny Smith’.The lowest antioxidant activity was determined in ‘Pink Lady’.The amount of antioxidants in flesh fruit, peel of apple and around the apple seeds were 29.93%, 21.95%, 27.22%, respectively. The amount of antioxidant in the analysis performed by TPC method was higher than that of ABTS and DPPH method.

Özet

Bu çalışmada Isparta ili Eğirdir ilçesinden temin edilen beş farklı elma çeşidinde meyve eti, kabuk ve çekirdek yuvasındaki antioksidan kapasiteleri ABTS, DPPH ve TFM yöntemleri kullanılarak belirlenmiştir. Analiz sonuçları incelendiğinde çeşitler, alınan kısımlar ve yöntemler bakımından antioksidan seviyelerinin farklılık gösterdiği görülmüştür. En yüksek antioksidan aktivite ‘Granny Smith’ çeşidinde bulunmuştur. En düşük antioksidan aktivite ise ‘Pink Lady’ çeşidinde tespit edilmiştir. Meyve eti, kabuk ve çekirdek yuvasındaki antioksidan miktarları sırasıyla %29.93, %21.95, %27.22 olarak tespit edilirken, TFM metodu ile yapılan analizlerde antioksidan miktarı ABTS ve DPPH metotlarına göre daha yüksek bulunmuştur.

🔖

Cite This Article

BENZER, F., YILDIRIM, M., ÇİMEN, M., BARIŞ, D., YILDIRIM, H., SANYÜREK, N. K., KARAKAVUK, E. (2022). Determination of Antioxidant Capacity of Flesh Fruit, around the Apple Seeds and Peel Apple in Some Apple Varieties from Isparta. International Journal of Pure and Applied Sciences, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 1, 31–36. https://ajindex.com/articles/541593

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Ağbaş, B., Karakuş, D., Adıgüzel, R., Keser, S., Demir, E., 2013. Tunceli sarımsağının (Allium tuncelianum) toplam antioksidan özelliklerinin ve kuru madde içeriğinin normal sarımsak (Allium sativum) ile karşılaştırılması. Bilim ve Gençlik Dergisi, 1(2):50–62.
  2. Bahukhandı, A., Dhyanı, P., Bhatt, I.D., Rawal, R.S., 2018. Variation in polyphenolics and antioxidant activity of traditional apple cultivars from West Himalaya, Uttarakhand. Horticultural Plant Journal, 4(4):151–157.
  3. Block, G., Patterson, B., Subar, A., 1992. Fruit, vegetables, and cancer prevention: a review of the epidemiological evidence. Nutrition and Cancer, 18:1–29.
  4. Boyer, J., Hai Liu, R., 2004a. Apple phyto chemicals and their health benefits. Nutrition Journal, 3:1-15.
  5. Boyer, J., Hai Liu, R., 2004b. Antioxidants of Apples. New York Fruıt Quarterly, 11:4. Connor, A.M., Luby, J.J., Tong, C.B., Finn, C.E., Hancock, J.F., 2002. Geno typic and environmental variation in antioxidant activity, total phenolic content, and anthocyanin content among blue berry cultivars. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science, 127: 89–97.
  6. Delian, E., Petre, V., Burzo, I., Badulescu, L., Hoza, D., 2011. Total phenols and nutrients composition aspects of some apple cultivars and new studied breeding creations lines grown in Voines¸ ti area – Romania. Romanian Biotechnological Letters, 16; 6722–6729.
  7. Eberhardt, M.V., Lee, C.Y., Liu, R.H., 2000. Antioxidant activity of fresh apples. Nature, 405:903–904.
  8. Escarpa, A., Gonzalez, M.C., 1998. High-performance liquid chromatography with diode-array detection forthe determination of phenolic compounds in peel and pulp from different apple varieties. Journal of Chromatography A, 823:331–337.
  9. Feskanich, D., Ziegler, R., Michaud, D., Giovannucci, E., Speizer, F., WIllett, W., Colditz, G., 2000. Prospective study of fruit and vegetable consumption and risk of lung cancer among men and women. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 92:1812–1823.
  10. Karaman, S., 2008. Türkiye’de yetiştirilen bazı elma çeşitlerinin toplam antioksidan kapasitelerinin ve antioksidan özellik gösteren başlıca bileşenlerinin karşılaştırılması. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, İ.T.Ü. Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, İstanbul.
  11. Keser, S., Çelik, S., Turkoglu, S., 2013. Total phenolic contents and free-radical scavenging activities of grape (Vitis vinifera L.) and grape products. International Journal of Food Sciences and Nutrition. 64(2):210–216.
  12. Lunec, J., 1992. Oxygenradicals: Their measurement and role in maj