Journals / Maden Tetkik ve Arama Dergisi / 2008 / Cilt: 136 - Sayı: 136

PRESENCE OF CRASSOSTREA GRYPHOIDES (SCHLOTHEIM) FROM THE LOWERMIDDLE MIOCENE SEQUENCE OF KAHRAMANMARAŞ BASIN (SE TURKEY); ITS TAXONOMY, PALEOECOLOGY AND PALEOGEOGRAPHY

Pages
17–28
Publication Date
2008-05-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The taxonomy, paleoecology and palaeogeography of the Neogene ostreid bivalve Crassostrea gryphoides (Schlotheim), and its paleogeographic effect the larval development from the Late Burdigalian-Early Langhian Salyan formation of the northwestern Kahramanmaraş Basin (southeastern Turkey) are discussed.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The Miocene rocks of the Salyan formation between the Salyan and Ahmetcik village in southeastern Turkey and northeastern Kahramanmaraş, contain Miocene bivalves and gastropods typical of the Tethys provence.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The abundant and generally well-preserved bivalves are dominated by Crassostrea gryphoides (Schlotheim).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The taxonomy, paleoecology and palaeogeography of the Neogene ostreid bivalve Crassostrea gryphoides (Schlotheim), and its paleogeographic effect the larval development from the Late Burdigalian-Early Langhian Salyan formation of the northwestern Kahramanmaraş Basin (southeastern Turkey) are discussed.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Bivalvia · Crassostrea · Early-Middle Miocene

Abstract

The Miocene rocks of the Salyan formation between the Salyan and Ahmetcik village in southeastern Turkey and northeastern Kahramanmaraş, contain Miocene bivalves and gastropods typical of the Tethys provence. The abundant and generally well-preserved bivalves are dominated by Crassostrea gryphoides (Schlotheim). The taxonomy, paleoecology and palaeogeography of the Neogene ostreid bivalve Crassostrea gryphoides (Schlotheim), and its paleogeographic effect the larval development from the Late Burdigalian-Early Langhian Salyan formation of the northwestern Kahramanmaraş Basin (southeastern Turkey) are discussed.

🔖

Cite This Article

HOŞGÖR, İ. (2008). PRESENCE OF CRASSOSTREA GRYPHOIDES (SCHLOTHEIM) FROM THE LOWERMIDDLE MIOCENE SEQUENCE OF KAHRAMANMARAŞ BASIN (SE TURKEY); ITS TAXONOMY, PALEOECOLOGY AND PALEOGEOGRAPHY. Maden Tetkik ve Arama Dergisi, Cilt: 136 - Sayı: 136, 17–28. https://ajindex.com/articles/54124

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (7)

  1. Aqrabawi, M. 1993. Oysters (Bivalvia-Pteriomorphia) of the Upper Cretaceous rocks of Jordan. Palaeontology, Stratigraphy and Comparision with the Upper Cretaceous oysters of Northwest Eyrope. Mitteilungen aus dem Geologisch Palaontologischen Institut der Universitat Hamburg, 75, 1-136.
  2. Azzaroli, A. 1958. L'oligocene e il Miocene della Somalia. Stratigrafia, Tectonica, Paleontologica (Macroforaminiferi, Coralli, Molluschi). Palaeontographia Italica, 52, 1-142.
  3. Baldi, T. and Steininger, F. 1975. Die Molluskenfauna des Egerien. Chronostratigraphie und Neostratotypen, Miozän OM, Egerien, 341-377pp. Baydar, O. 1989. Berit-Kandil dağları (Kahramanmaraş) ve civarının jeolojisi. Doktora Tezi. Istanbul Üniversitesi, 248 s., Istanbul (unpublished). Baydar, O. and Yergök, A.F. 1996. Güneydoğu Anadolu-kenar kıvrım kuşağı-Amanos dağları kuzeyi ve Doğu Toroslar'ın jeolojisi. MTA Rapor No. 9944 (unpublished) Berggren, W.A., Kent, D.V., Swisher, C.C. and Aubry, M.P. 1995. A revised Cenozoic Geochronology and Chronostratigraphy. In: Berggren, W.A., Kent, D.V., Hardenbol, J (eds.). Geochronology Time Scales and Global Stratigraphic Correlation, SEPM Special Publication, 54, 129-170.
  4. Beurlen, K.1944. Beiträge zur stammesgeschichte der Muscheln. Bayerischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, 1-2, 133-145
  5. Bieler, R. and Mikkelsen, P.M. 2006. Bivalvia-a look at the Branches. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 148, 223-235.
  6. Blanckenhorn, M. 1890. Das Marine Miocan in Syrien, 32 p. Cossmann, M. and Peyrot, A. 1914. Conchiologie Neogenique de I'Aquitaine, t.3, Act. Soc. Linn., Bordeaux. Dermitzakis, M.D. 1969. Geological researches of the Neogene deposits of the Hierapetra province in Crete. Annales Geologiques des pays Helleniques, 21, 342-484.
  7. Dollfuss, G.F. and Dautzenberg, P.H. 1904. Conchyliologie du Miocene moyen du bassin de la Loire. Memoires de Societa Geologie France, 27 p. El-Hedeny, M.M. 2005. Taphonomy and paleoecology of the Middle Miocene oysters from Wadi Sudr, Gulf of Suez. Revue de Paléobiologie, 24, 719733. Erünal-Erentöz, L. 1958, Mollusques du Neogene des Bassins de Karaman, Adana et Hatay (Turquie), Theses. A la Faculte des Sciences de l'Universite de Paris, Le Grade de Docteur es Sciences Naturelles, 232 s. Ferussac A.E.J.P.J.F. 1822. Tableaux systématiques des animaux mollusques classés en familles naturelles, dans lesquels on a établi la concordance de tous les systèmes; suivis d'un prodrome générale pour tous les mollusques terrestres ou fluviatiles, vi