Journals / IOJET / 2021 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 3

TEACHING SCIENCE: WHO AM I? WHAT DO I PLAN?

Journal
IOJET
Pages
2150–2175
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

While describing an ideal science classroom, the participants considered general characteristics of students and teachers and general/physical features of the classroom.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Achievement in primary school science courses has always been a field of interest by researchers in Turkey and other countries.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Seventy-seven juniors, 78 seniors, and 87 in-service teachers participated in this study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:While describing an ideal science classroom, the participants considered general characteristics of students and teachers and general/physical features of the classroom.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Achievement in primary school science courses has always been a field of interest by researchers in Turkey and other countries. For this reason, studies are conducted on science teaching at the primary school level. This study aimed to examine strengths and weaknesses of pre- and in-service primary teachers in science teaching. In addition, to overcome their weaknesses, the features that they imagined for a science classroom were revealed. Seventy-seven juniors, 78 seniors, and 87 in-service teachers participated in this study. The study data were collected through an opinion form called “I Teach Science,” consisting of four questions. Findings were revealed following a descriptive analysis. The findings of the study revealed that the most frequently uttered strengths were the ability to do/design experiments, adoption of activity-based science teaching, application of different methods/technical knowledge, science process skills, and an interest in/attitude toward science. The most common weaknesses were found to be lack of field knowledge, lack of self-confidence, inability to do experiments, lack of laboratory knowledge, inability to design/use materials, and lack of interest in and attitude toward science. The most common ways they would apply to improve their weaknesses were found to be research, reviewing resources, obtaining help from experts or colleagues, designing experiments, researching/learning different methods, using different resources, and developing planning skills. While describing an ideal science classroom, the participants considered general characteristics of students and teachers and general/physical features of the classroom.

🔖

Cite This Article

Kalyon, D. Ş. (2022). TEACHING SCIENCE: WHO AM I? WHAT DO I PLAN?. IOJET, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 3, 2150–2175. https://ajindex.com/articles/541194

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Abell, S. K., & Roth, M. (1991, April). Coping with constraints of teaching elementary science: A case study of a science enthusiast student teacher. Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Lake Geneva, WI. Ahtee, M. & Johnston, J. (2006). Primary student teachers' ideas about teaching a physics topic, Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 50(2), 207-219.
  2. Akben, N. (2018). Sınıf öğretmeni adaylarinin uygulamaya dayali fen öğretime ilişkin görüşleri [Regarding Application Based Science Teaching Views of Primary School Teacher Candidates]. Ankara University Journal of Faculty of Educational Sciences (JFES), 51 (3), 145-168. 10.30964/auebfd.447336 American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1990). Science for all Americans. New York: Oxford University Press.
  3. Anagün, Ş. S., Kılıç, Z., Atalay, N., & Yaşar, S. (2015). Sınıf öğretmeni adayları fen bilimleri öğretim programını uygulamaya hazır mı? [Are classroom teacher candidates ready to perform science curriculum?] Turkish Studies, 10(11), 127-148.
  4. Appleton, K. (1991). Mature-age students – how are they different? Research in Science Education, 21, 1–9.
  5. Appleton, K. (2003). How do beginning primary school teachers cope with science? toward an understanding of science teaching practice. Research in Science Education, 33, 1-25. http://link.springer.com/article/10.1023/A%3A1023666618800
  6. Appleton, K., & Kindt, I. (1999). Why teach primary science? Influences on beginning teachers’ practices. International Journal of Science Education, 21, 155–168.
  7. Avery, L. M., & Meyer, D. Z. (2012). Teaching science as science is practiced: Opportunities and limits for enhancing preservice elementary teachers’ self-efficacy for science and science teaching. School Science and Mathematics, 112(7), 395–409.
  8. Baird, J. (1988). Teachers in science education. In P. Fensham (Ed.) Development and dilemmas in science education, London: The Falmer Press. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED309081.pdf adresinden erişilmiştir. Bates, A. W. (2015). Teaching in a digital age: Guidelines for designing teaching and learning. Vancouver: Tony Bates Associates LTD. https://opentextbc.ca/teachinginadigitalage/ adresinden erişilmiştir. Büyüköztürk, Ş., Çakmak, K. E., Akgün, E, Ö., Karadeniz, Ş.,& Demirel, F. (2010). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri[Scientific Research Methods]. Ankara: Pegem. Can, Ş, Çelik, C. (2018). Fen bilgisi ve sinif öğretmeni adaylarinin öğretme-öğrenme anlayişlarinin incel