Journals / International Journal of Innovative Engineering Applications / 2022 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 1

The Physicochemical Properties of Tecer Lake (Ulaş/Sivas) and Its Phytoplanktonic Communities

Tecer Gölü’nün (Ulaş/Sivas) Fizikokimyasal Özellikleri ve İçerdiği Fitoplanktonik Topluluklar

Pages
81–90
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This lake water was classified as very hard water in regard to the data of the water hardness, however it is also designated as Class I waters in terms of temperature, dissolved oxygen, ammonium, nitrate, nitrite, iron and manganese values, Class II waters in terms of total phosphate and Class IV waters in terms of pH, chloride, sulfate and chemical oxygen demand according to the Water Pollution Control Regulation.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, the physicochemical properties of the water and phytoplankton species composition of Tecer Lake were investigated.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The sampling was performed at a single station, which is approximately the middle point of the lake, in monthly periods between December 2010 and December 2011 for a period of one year.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This lake water was classified as very hard water in regard to the data of the water hardness, however it is also designated as Class I waters in terms of temperature, dissolved oxygen, ammonium, nitrate, nitrite, iron and manganese values, Class II waters in terms of total phosphate and Class IV waters in terms of pH, chloride, sulfate and chemical oxygen demand according to the Water Pollution Control Regulation.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2010 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Tecer Gölü · Fitoplankton · Su Kimyası

Abstract

In this study, the physicochemical properties of the water and phytoplankton species composition of Tecer Lake were investigated. The sampling was performed at a single station, which is approximately the middle point of the lake, in monthly periods between December 2010 and December 2011 for a period of one year. A total of 63 species were identified in the lake, representing the groups of Bacillariophyta (27), Cyanobacteria (15), Chlorophyta (14), Ochrophyta (3), Cryptophyta (2) and Euglenozoa (2). The mean values of physicochemical parameters in the lake water were estimated as: water temperature; 11oC, dissolved oxygen (DO); 8 mg/l, electrical conductivity (EC); 9,68 mS/cm, turbidity; 5,42 NTU, suspended solids (SS); 28,7 mg/l, pH; 9,32, calcium; 4939 mg/l, hardness; 1460 mgCaCO3/l, total alkalinity (TA); 261 mgCaCO3/l, sulfate; 805 mg/l, silica; 0,54 mg/l, chemical oxygen demand (COD); 150 mg/l, chloride; 1255 mg/l, total phosphate (TP); 67.9 µg/l, total soluble phosphate (TSP); 48,5 µg/l, soluble reactive phosphate (SRP); 13,9 µg/l, chlorophyll-a; 1,212 µg/l, ammonium (NH4-N); 0,048 mg/l), nitrate (NO3-N); 0,1282 mg/l and nitrite (NO2-N); 0.0048 mg/l. This lake water was classified as very hard water in regard to the data of the water hardness, however it is also designated as Class I waters in terms of temperature, dissolved oxygen, ammonium, nitrate, nitrite, iron and manganese values, Class II waters in terms of total phosphate and Class IV waters in terms of pH, chloride, sulfate and chemical oxygen demand according to the Water Pollution Control Regulation.

Özet

Bu çalışmada, Tecer gölü suyunun fizikokimyasal özellikleri ve fitoplanktonunun tür kompozisyonu belirlenmeye çalışılmıştır. Örnekler bir yıllık süreyle Aralık 2010 ve Aralık 2011 tarihleri arasında aylık periyotlarla gölün orta noktasında belirlenen tek istasyondan alınmıştır. Gölde Bacillariophyta (27), Cyanobacteria (15), Chlorophyta (14), Ochrophyta (3), Cryptophyta (2) ve Euglenozoa (2) gruplarına ait toplam 63 tür belirlenmiştir. Göl suyunda fizikokimyasal parametrelere ait ortalama değerler; su sıcaklığı; 11oC, çözünmüş oksijen (ÇO); 8 mg/l, elektriksel iletkenlik (EC); 9,68 mS/cm, bulanıklık; 5,42 NTU, askıda katı madde (AKM); 28,7 mg/l, pH;, 9,32, kalsiyum; 4939 mg/l, sertlik; 1460 mgCaCO3/l, toplam alkalinite (TA); 261 mgCaCO3/l, sülfat; 805 mg/l, silika; 0,54 mg/l, kimyasal oksijen ihtiyacı (KOİ) ;150 mg/l, klorür; 1255 mg/l, toplam fosfat (TF); 67,9 µg/l , toplam çözünebilir fosfat (TÇF); 48,5 µg/l, çözülebilir reaktif fosfat (ÇRF); 13,9 µg/l, klorofil-a; 1,212 µg/l, amonyum (NH4-N); 0,048 mg/l), nitrat (NO3-N); 0,1282 mg/l ve nitrit (NO2-N); 0,0048 mg/l’ dir. Su sertlik verilerine göre çok sert su sınıfına giren göl suyu, Su Kirliliği Kontrolü Yönetmeliği’ne göre; sıcaklık, çözünmüş oksijen, amonyum, nitrat, nitrit, demir ve mangan değerleri bakımından I. Sınıf, toplam fosfat bakımından II. Sınıf ve pH, klorür, sülfat ve kimyasal oksijen ihtiyacı bakımından ise IV. Sınıf sulara sahiptir.

🔖

Cite This Article

KASAKA, E. (2022). The Physicochemical Properties of Tecer Lake (Ulaş/Sivas) and Its Phytoplanktonic Communities. International Journal of Innovative Engineering Applications, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 1, 81–90. https://ajindex.com/articles/541192

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Alver, A., Baştürk, E. (2019). Karasu Nehri Su Kalitesinin Farklı Su Kalite İndeksleri Açısından Değerlendirilmesi. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi 23, 2, 488- 497
  2. Nogueira, M.G. (2000). Phytoplankton composition, dominance and abundance as indicators of environmental compartmentalization in Jurumirim Reservoir (Paranapanema River), São Paulo, Brazil. Hydrobiologia, 431: 115–128
  3. Trifonova, I.S., (1998). Phytoplankton composition and biomass structure in relation to trophic gradient in some temperate and subarctic lakes of north-western Russia and the Prebaltic. Hydrobiologia 369-370: 99-108
  4. Reynolds, C.S., V. Huszar, C. Kruk, L. Naselli-Flores, S. Melo. (2002). Review towards a functional classification of the freshwater phytoplankton. Journal of Plankton Research 24: 417-428
  5. Sıvacı, E.R., Yardım, Ö., Gönülol, A., Bat, L., Gümüş, F. (2008). Sarıkum (Sinop-Türkiye) lagününün bentik algleri. Journal of FisheriesSciences. 2(4): 592-600
  6. Kıvrak, E., (2011). Karamuk Gölü (Afyonkarahisar) Fitoplankton Kommunitesinin Mevsimsel Değişimi ve Bazı Fiziko-kimyasal ÖzellikleriE. Ü. Su Ürünleri Dergisi, 28, 1: 9-19
  7. Taş, B., Çetin, M. (2011). Gökgöl (ordu-türkiye)’ün bazı fiziko-kimyasal özelliklerinin incelenmesi. Ordu Üniv. Bil. Tek. Dergisi, 1,1,73-82 [8] SKKY, (2004). Su Kirliliği Kontrol Yönetmeliği. 31.12.2004 Tarih ve 25687 Sayılı Resmi Gazete, Ankara
  8. Ay, F., Yalçın Erik, N. (2003). Ulaş (Sivas) kuzeyindeki Tersiyer yaslı birimlerin petrol kaynak kaya ve organik fasiyes özellikleri. Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi Mühendislik Fakültesi Dergisi, Seri A-Yerbilimleri c.20 (s.1), 38-51
  9. Lund, J.W.G., Kipling, C., Le Cren, E.D., (1958). The İnverted Microscope Method of Estimating Algal Numbers and the Statistical Basis of Estimations by Counting, Hydrobiologia 11, 143-171
  10. Komarek, J., Fott, B. (1983). Das Phytoplankton des Süwassers, 7.Teil, 1 hälfte, Stuttgart, 1043p
  11. Komarek, J., Anagnostidis, K. (1998). Süwasserflora von Mitteleuropa Cyanoprokaryota, 19/1, 1.Teil: Chroococcales, Gustav Fischer Verlag, Stuttgart, 548p
  12. Komarek,J., Anagnostidis, K. (1999). Cyanoprokaryota 1. Teil Chroococcales. Süsswasserflora von Mitteleuropa. Gustav Fischer, Jena, 548 p., Germany
  13. Komarek, J., Anagnostidis, K. (2008). Süwasserflora von Mitteleuropa Cyanoprokaryota, 19/2, 2.Teil/ Part2: Oscillatoriales, Gustav Fischer Verlag, Stuttgart, 759p
  14. John, D. M., Whitton, B. A., Brook, A. J. (2003)