Journals / IOJET / 2021 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 2

AN INVESTIGATION OF FUTURE EDUCATIONAL LEADERS’ METAPHORICPERCEPTIONS REGARDING SUSTAINABILITY ACCORDING TO THEIRKNOWLEDGE LEVELS

Journal
IOJET
Pages
1151–1171
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The cluster analysis results showed that the pre-service teachers were categorized into three groups: low, middle, and high.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study aims to investigate metaphors of pre-service teachers, the potential future educational leaders, regarding sustainability according to their knowledge level of sustainability.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The participants consisted of 867 pre-service teachers from different departments of the Faculty of Education in a public university in Turkey.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The cluster analysis results showed that the pre-service teachers were categorized into three groups: low, middle, and high.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2014 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This study aims to investigate metaphors of pre-service teachers, the potential future educational leaders, regarding sustainability according to their knowledge level of sustainability. The study utilized the convergent research method, one of the mixed-method research designs based on both quantitative and qualitative data. The participants consisted of 867 pre-service teachers from different departments of the Faculty of Education in a public university in Turkey. The data were collected via “The Knowledge Test” developed by (Gökmen, 2014) and “The Metaphor Determination Form” (Yıldırım, 2013), whose reliability and validity studies were also conducted. Cluster analysis was used to analyze the quantitative data and the pre-service teachers were categorized according to their knowledge level of sustainability. Content analysis was used to analyze the qualitative data and using the results obtained the pre-service teachers’ metaphors were categorized. The results revealed that the pre-service teachers’ knowledge levels of sustainability were above the middle-level. The cluster analysis results showed that the pre-service teachers were categorized into three groups: low, middle, and high. The pre-service teachers created 32 meaningful metaphors under four different categories (vital, economic, social, and will-o-the-wisp). The results also showed that the metaphors created by the pre-service teachers significantly varied by their knowledge level of sustainability.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÖKMEN, A. (2022). AN INVESTIGATION OF FUTURE EDUCATIONAL LEADERS’ METAPHORICPERCEPTIONS REGARDING SUSTAINABILITY ACCORDING TO THEIRKNOWLEDGE LEVELS. IOJET, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 2, 1151–1171. https://ajindex.com/articles/541114

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Ağtaş, B., Bektaş, O. & Güneri, E. (2019) Ortaokul öğrencilerinin çevreye yönelik tutum düzeylerinin belirlenmesi. Online Fen Eğitimi Dergisi, 4(1), 66-85.
  2. Akıllı, M. & Yurtcan, M.T. (2009) İlköğretim fen bilgisi öğretmeni adaylarının çevreye karşı tutumlarının farklı değişkenler açısından incelenmesi (Kazım Karabekir Eğitim Fakültesi Örneği). Erzincan Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 11(2), 119-131
  3. Al-Naqbi, A. K., & Alshannag, Q. (2018). The status of education for sustainable development and sustainability knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors of UAE University students. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 19(3), 566-8-588.
  4. Arık, S. & Yılmaz, M. (2017). Fen bilimleri öğretmen adaylarının çevre sorunlarına yönelik tutumları ve çevre kirliliğine yönelik metaforik algıları. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 25(3), 1147-1164.
  5. Atasay, E. & Ertük, H. (2008). İlköğretim öğrencilerinin çevresel tutum ve çevre bilgisi üzerine bir alan araştırması. Erzincan Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 10(1), 105-122.
  6. Aydın, S. Ö., Şahin, S. & Korkmaz, T. (2013). Determination and comparison of elementary science, primary classroom and preschool teacher candidates’ environmental attitude levels. Necatibey Eğitim Fakültesi Elektronik Fen ve Matematik Eğitimi Dergisi (EFMED), 7(2), 248-267.
  7. Azapagic, A., Perdan, S., & Shallcross, D. (2005). How much do engineering students know about sustainable development? The findings of an international survey and possible implications for the engineering curriculum, European Journal of Engineering Education, 30(1), 1-19, DOI: 10.1080/03043790512331313804 Bademci, V. (2005) Testler güvenilir değildir: ölçüm güvenirliğine yeterli dikkat ve güvenirlik çalışmaları için örneklem büyüklüğü. Gazi Üniversitesi Endüstriyel Sanatlar Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 17, 33-45.
  8. Bergman, B. G. (2015).Assessing impacts of locally designed environmental education projects on students’ environmental attitudes, awareness, and intention to act. Environmental Education Research, 22(4), 480-503. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2014.999225
  9. Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives. Vol. 1: Cognitive Domain. New York: McKay. Bolis, I., Morioka, S. N., & Sznelwar, L. I. (2014). When sustainable development risks losing its meaning. Delimiting the concept with a comprehensive literature review and a conceptual model. Journal of Cleaner Production, 83, 7–20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.06.041
  10. Bozdemir, H., Faiz, M. (2018). Öğretmen ad