Journals / Maden Tetkik ve Arama Dergisi / 2009 / Cilt: 139 - Sayı: 139

Sedimentological-Stratigraphical evaluation of Tertiary carbonates (Soğucak Formation) of Thrace basin (Bozcaada-Kıyıköy)

Pages
1–15
Publication Date
2009-08-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Sedimentological features and age data indicate that Soğucak formation was deposited under the control of antecedent topography and it is the product of a time-transitive transgression together with coastal morphology and sea level changes

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Soğucak formation which crops out in Thrace Basin has characteristics of reefal limestones and is one of the target levels in oil exploration studies in the basin.
📊
Key Findings & Data:While this unit directly and unconformably overlies the basement rocks in some areas, it is transitive to siliciclastic-dominated units (Koyunbaba formation) in other areas.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Sedimentological features and age data indicate that Soğucak formation was deposited under the control of antecedent topography and it is the product of a time-transitive transgression together with coastal morphology and sea level changes
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Thrace Basin · Soğucak formation · sedimentology

Abstract

Soğucak formation which crops out in Thrace Basin has characteristics of reefal limestones and is one of the target levels in oil exploration studies in the basin. While this unit directly and unconformably overlies the basement rocks in some areas, it is transitive to siliciclastic-dominated units (Koyunbaba formation) in other areas. The Soğucak formation is comprised of carbonates of the reefal-shore complex which was deposited in ashelf environment as a consequence of a transgression which lasted between Early-Middle Eocene and early Oligocene. The rocks of the lower limit of the age interval of the formation, the Lower Eocene, crops out in Bozcaada only and is transitive to Fıçıtepe formation. In general, the unit was deposited in SE of the basin between middle-Late Eocene, and between Late Eocene and Early Oligocene in NE of the basin. Sedimentological features and age data indicate that Soğucak formation was deposited under the control of antecedent topography and it is the product of a time-transitive transgression together with coastal morphology and sea level changes

🔖

Cite This Article

VAROL, B., BAYKAL, M., AYYILDIZ, T. (2009). Sedimentological-Stratigraphical evaluation of Tertiary carbonates (Soğucak Formation) of Thrace basin (Bozcaada-Kıyıköy). Maden Tetkik ve Arama Dergisi, Cilt: 139 - Sayı: 139, 1–15. https://ajindex.com/articles/54105

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (5)

  1. Batı, Z., Erk, S., and Akça, N., 1993. Trakya hav- zası Tersiyer birimlerinin palinomorf, fo- raminifer ve nannoplankton biyostratig- rafisi. TPAO Araştırma Merkezi Grubu, Rapor no:1947, 92 p. Ankara, (unpublis- hed). Baykal, M., Varol, B., and Ayyıldız, T., 2007. Ku- zey Trakya Soğucak Formasyonu’ nun sedimantolojisi. 60. Türkiye Jeoloji Ku- rultayı Bildiri Özleri, 358, Ankara. ______, ______, and _____., 2009. Kıyıköy ve yakın civarında (KD Trakya) Soğucak Formasyonu’ nun ortamsal değerlendi- rilmesi. 62. Türkiye Jeoloji Kurultayı Bil- diri Özleri Kitabı-I, 324-325,
  2. Ankara.
  3. Çağlayan, M.A., and Yurtsever, A., 1998. Bur- gaz-A3, Edirne-B2 ve B3; Burgaz-A4 ve Kırklareli-B4, Kırklareli-B5 ve B6, Kırkla- reli-C6 paftaları, 1:100000 ölçekli açın- sama nitelikli Türkiye Jeoloji haritaları, No:20,21,22,23 MTA, Ankara. Erenler,M., 1985. Trakya baseni merkezi kısmın- da seçilen kuyuların mikropaleontoloji ve biyostratigrafileri. TPAO Araştırma Merkezi Grubu, Rapor no: 809. Ankara (unpublished). Esso Standard, 1960. I sayılı Marmara petrol bölgesi AR/EST/105,106, 108 ve 109 hak sıra numaralı sahalara ait terk rapo- ru. TPAO Arama Grubu, Rapor no: 1031. Ankara, (unpublished). Görür, N and Okay, A.I., 1996. Fore – arc origin of the Thrace basin, northwest Turkey. Geologische Rundschau, 85, 662-668
  4. Holmes, A.W.,1961. Stratigraphic review of the Thrace. TPAO Rapor no: 368. Ankara, (unpublished). İmik, M, 1988. Kırklareli-C2-3 Paftası ve İzahna- mesi, 1:100 000 ölçekli Türkiye Jeoloji Haritaları. Maden Tetkik ve Arama Ge- nel Müdürlüğü, Ankara 10 p. Islamoğlu, Y., Harzhauser, M., Gross, M., Ji- me´nez-Moreno, G., Coric, S., Kroh, A., Rögl, F., and van der Made, J., 2008. From Tethys to Eastern Paratethys: Oli- gocene depositional environments, pa- leoecology and paleobiogeography of the Thrace Basin (NW Turkey). Kopp, K.O., Pavoni,N and Schindler,C., 1969. Geologie Thrakiens IV: Das Ergene- Becken. Beih zum Geol.Jahrb.,Heft 76,136 p., Hannover. Kasar, S., Bürkan, K., Siyako, M., and Demir, O., 1983. Tekirdağ - Şarköy - Keşan - Enez bölgesinin jeolojisi ve hidrokarbon ola- nakları. TPAO Arama Grubu, no:1771, 71 p. Ankara, (unpublished). R a p o r Keskin, C., 1966. Pınarhisar resif karmaşığı mik- rofasiyes incelemesi. Rev. Fac. S c i e n. Univ. İst., Seri B,31/3 -4, 109-146. ______, 1974. Kuzey Trakya havzasının stratig- rafisi. Türkiye İkinci Petrol Kongresi Tebliğleri Kitabı, 137-163.
  5. Kesgin, Y., and Varol, B., 2003. Gökçeada ve Bozcaada’nın Tersiyer Jeolojisi (Çanak-