Journals / International Journal of Environment and Geoinformatics / 2020 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 3

Mussel: a potential pollution indicator in the aquatic ecosystem and effect of climate change

Pages
300–304
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

We, therefore, focus on the factors that possibly effect the mussel biodiversity in aquatic ecosystems in relation to climate change as well as pollution concerned.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The study of ecological indicators, defining and establishing the means of measuring the health of the environment, is of great importance.
📊
Key Findings & Data:On the other hand, global warming does affect the pH level, especially the marine water resulting increase in acidity.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:We, therefore, focus on the factors that possibly effect the mussel biodiversity in aquatic ecosystems in relation to climate change as well as pollution concerned.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Aquatic pollution · Bioindicator · Ocean acidification

Abstract

The study of ecological indicators, defining and establishing the means of measuring the health of the environment, is of great importance. The most important elements of ecosystems are the biological components, and environmental impact assessment of ecosystems will therefore require that these components are seriously laid out. It is, for example, not sufficient to assess the water quality by the use of physicochemical parameters, although their determination can be carried out much more rapidly. There exists, in general, a relation between species composition and water quality. It is well known that mussels are extensively utilized as a biological indicator of pollution of both marine and freshwater ecosystems. The reason is that the mussel is a sessile, filter-feeding, and able to accumulate within its tissues many of the contaminants. In addition, mussels show a wide geographical distribution as they permit the survey of extensive coastal and inland areas. The contaminants accumulated in the tissues of mussels may cause a “stress syndrome” with alteration to their physiology. On the other hand, global warming does affect the pH level, especially the marine water resulting increase in acidity. This can be the outcome of the existing genetic variation in natural populations of mussels. They because allow themselves to adapt to declining pH levels in the aquatic ecosystem caused by carbon emissions. We, therefore, focus on the factors that possibly effect the mussel biodiversity in aquatic ecosystems in relation to climate change as well as pollution concerned.

🔖

Cite This Article

Khan, U., ATASARAL, Ş., TERZİ, Y., SEYHAN, K. (2022). Mussel: a potential pollution indicator in the aquatic ecosystem and effect of climate change. International Journal of Environment and Geoinformatics, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 3, 300–304. https://ajindex.com/articles/541003

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Alkan, N., Alkan, A., Demirak, A., & Bahloul, M. (2020). Metals/metalloid in Marine Sediments, Bioaccumulating in Macroalgae and a Mussel. Soil and Sediment Contamination: An International Journal, 29(5), 569-594. https://doi.org/10.1080/15320383.2020.1751061
  2. Balcıoğlu, E. B. (2016). Potential effects of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in marine foods on human health: a critical review. Toxin Reviews, 35(3-4), 98-105. https://doi.org/10.1080/15569543.2016.1201513
  3. Berge, J. A., Bjerkeng, B., Pettersen, O., Schaanning, M. T., & Øxnevad, S. (2006). Effects of increased sea water concentrations of CO2 on growth of the bivalve Mytilus edulis L. Chemosphere, 62(4), 681-687. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2005.04.111
  4. Bibby, R., Widdicombe, S., Parry, H., Spicer, J., & Pipe, R. (2008). Effects of ocean acidification on the immune response of the blue mussel Mytilus edulis. Aquatic Biology, 2(1), 67-74. doi:10.3354/ab00037 Bitter, M., Kapsenberg, L., Gattuso, J.-P., & Pfister, C. (2019). Standing genetic variation fuels rapid adaptation to ocean acidification. Nature communications, 10(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-13767-1
  5. Borunda, A. (2019). National Geographic: ocean acidification, explained. Retrieved from https://www.nationalgeographic.com/environment/oceans/critical-issues-ocean-acidification/ 19/07/2020
  6. Clarke, R. T., Wright, J. F., & Furse, M. T. (2003). RIVPACS models for predicting the expected macroinvertebrate fauna and assessing the ecological quality of rivers. Ecological modelling, 160(3), 219-233. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3800(02)00255-7
  7. Delahaut, V. (2012). Development of a challenge test for the blue mussel, Mytilus edulis. Bioscience Engineering, 103. Gruber, N., Clement, D., Carter, B. R., Feely, R. A., Van Heuven, S., Hoppema, M.,. & Monaco, C. L. (2019). The oceanic sink for anthropogenic CO2 from 1994 to 2007. Science, 363(6432), 1193-1199. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aau5153
  8. Holt, E. A. & Miller, S. W. (2010) Bioindicators: Using Organisms to Measure Environmental Impacts. Nature Education Knowledge 3(10):8 Honda, M., & Suzuki, N. (2020). Toxicities of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons for Aquatic Animals. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(4), 1363. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17041363
  9. Li, J., Lusher, A. L., Rotchell, J. M., Deudero, S., Turra, A., Bråte, I., Sun, C., Shahadat Hossain, M., Li, Q., Kolandhasamy, P., & Shi, H. (2019). Using mussel as a global bioin