Journals / International Journal of Environment and Geoinformatics / 2020 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 2

Management of Carbon Footprint and Determination of GHG Emission Sources in Construction Sector

Pages
191–204
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Emissions from non-owned or uncontrolled sources such as production, transportation, leased assets, outsourced services and disposal of the wastes generated during the construction or operation of the stages of different building typologies are included in the carbon footprint calculations.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Carbon footprint involves the calculation of direct and/or indirect emissions of fossil fuels that emit greenhouse gases (GHG) that lead to greenhouse effect responsible of global warming.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The resulting carbon dioxide (CO2) due to the activities of the individuals/institutions emerges into the atmosphere with the consumption of energy.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Emissions from non-owned or uncontrolled sources such as production, transportation, leased assets, outsourced services and disposal of the wastes generated during the construction or operation of the stages of different building typologies are included in the carbon footprint calculations.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Carbon Footprint · Construction Sector · Climate Change

Abstract

Carbon footprint involves the calculation of direct and/or indirect emissions of fossil fuels that emit greenhouse gases (GHG) that lead to greenhouse effect responsible of global warming. The resulting carbon dioxide (CO2) due to the activities of the individuals/institutions emerges into the atmosphere with the consumption of energy. The amount of emissions throughout the world in general and in Turkey, and the main reasons of these emissions is explained in this study. Carbon footprint management and tracking since 1990’s in Turkey are underlined, and carbon tax and carbon trade terminologies are introduced. Scope classification for determining emissions according to three classification of ISO 14064 Greenhouse Gas Calculation and Validation Management System is described. Scope-1 covers the activities that create direct carbon footprint. In this context, the fossil fuels used by the projects for heating or energy needs and the emissions from the fuels of the vehicles are taken into consideration. Within Scope-2, the carbon footprints of the emissions caused by the electrical energy consumed by the projects are considered. Scope-3 is an indirect carbon footprint and includes emissions from projects that are not directly emission-driven projects. With this study, it is aimed to address the carbon footprint caused by the entire construction sector that extends from the production of construction materials to the construction and post-construction (operation) stages. This sector is focused on due to its significance regarding GHG emissions globally. Emissions from non-owned or uncontrolled sources such as production, transportation, leased assets, outsourced services and disposal of the wastes generated during the construction or operation of the stages of different building typologies are included in the carbon footprint calculations.

🔖

Cite This Article

TANIK, A., AHMETOĞLU, S. (2022). Management of Carbon Footprint and Determination of GHG Emission Sources in Construction Sector. International Journal of Environment and Geoinformatics, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 2, 191–204. https://ajindex.com/articles/540996

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (7)

  1. Abergel, T., Dean, B., Dulac, J. (2017). Towards a zero-emission, efficient, and resilient buildings and construction sector: Global Status Report 2017. UN Environment and International Energy Agency. Paris, France. Acquaye, A. A., Duffy, A. P. (2010). Input–output analysis of Irish construction sector greenhouse gas emissions. Building and Environment, 45(3), 784-791.
  2. Akan, M. O. A., Dhavale, D. G., Sarkis, J. (2017). Greenhouse gas emissions in the construction industry: An analysis and evaluation of a concrete supply chain. Journal of Cleaner Production, 167, 1195-1207.
  3. Alıcı, B., Yıldız, H. (2012). Carbon tax ant its efficient use in the protection of the environment that is a global public good. Journal of Law and Economics Research, 4(1), 55-61. (In Turkish) Aye, L., Ngo, T., Crawford, R. H., Gammampila, R., Mendis, P. (2012). Life cycle greenhouse gas emissions and energy analysis of prefabricated reusable building modules. Energy and Buildings, 47, 159-168.
  4. Bayırhan, İ., Mersin, K., Tokuşlu, A., Gazioğlu, C. (2019). Modelling of Ship Originated Exhaust Gas Emissions in the Strait of Istanbul (Bosphorus). International Journal of Environment and Geoinformatics, 6(3), 238-243. DOI: 10.30897/ijegeo.641397. Biyik, Y., Özkale, L. (2017). Relationship between the iron and steel industry production methods and export, added value and carbon emission reduction policies. International Journal of Management Economics and Business, 13(5), 718-735. (In Turkish) Candemir, B., Beyhan, B., Karaata, S. (2012). Sustainability in Construction: Green Building and Nanotechnology Strategies. TUSIAD Publications No: TUSIAD-T-2012-10-/533. İstanbul: Sis Printing Press, 134 p. (In Turkish) Chastas, P., Theodosiou, T., Bikas, D. (2016). Embodied energy in residential buildings-towards the nearly zero energy building: A literature re-view. Building and Environment, 105, 267-282.
  5. Cho, S. H., Chae, C. U. (2016). A study on life cycle CO2 emissions of low-carbon building in South Korea. Sustainability, 8(6), 579. Das, S. K., Green, J. A. (2010). Aluminum industry and climate change—assessment and responses. The Journal of the Minerals, Metals and Materials Society JOM, 62(2), 27-31.
  6. De Castro, S., De Brito, J. (2013). Evaluation of the durability of concrete made with crushed glass aggregates. Journal of Cleaner Production, 41, 7-14.
  7. Duman, H., Özpeynirci, R., Yücenurşen, M., Bağcı, H. (2012). Carbon accounting. Journal of Social Economic Research, 12 (24), 105-120. (In Turkis