SavedAdd your journal

Journals / IOJET / 2021 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 3

INVESTIGATION OF PRE-SERVICE SCIENCE TEACHERS' KNOWLEDGE ABOUT FOOD WEB

Mehmet Yılmaz
Ferhat Karakaya
Journal
IOJET
Pages
1511–1526
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

When the reasons for the pre-service science teachers' misconceptions, confusion and misleading about food web were examined, it was found out that teachers, textbooks, supplementary textbooks and individual errors were the reasons.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Biology is a complex science that includes different subjects.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The research, using the case study, was conducted in 2019-2020.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:When the reasons for the pre-service science teachers' misconceptions, confusion and misleading about food web were examined, it was found out that teachers, textbooks, supplementary textbooks and individual errors were the reasons.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2019-2020 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Biology is a complex science that includes different subjects. As a result, misconceptions, confusion and misleading are common problems in biology education. In this study, it was aimed to determine the learning of pre-service science teachers about food web. The research, using the case study, was conducted in 2019-2020. The study group of the research consists of 76 pre-service science teachers. The structured interview form and focus group interview were used to collect the data. As a result of the research, it was determined that pre-service science teachers have misconceptions, confusion and misleading about food web. When the reasons for the pre-service science teachers' misconceptions, confusion and misleading about food web were examined, it was found out that teachers, textbooks, supplementary textbooks and individual errors were the reasons. Pre-service science teachers should be supported with scientific training in order to learn the food web correctly. In addition, international scientific books should be used in the preparation of textbooks on food web.

🔖

Cite This Article

Yılmaz, M., Karakaya, F. (2022). INVESTIGATION OF PRE-SERVICE SCIENCE TEACHERS' KNOWLEDGE ABOUT FOOD WEB. IOJET, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 3, 1511–1526. https://ajindex.com/articles/540994

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Adıgüzel, M., & Yılmaz, M. (2020). Action research on identifying and correcting pre-service biology teachers’ misconceptions. Eğitimde Kuram ve Uygulama, 16(1), 69-82. https://doi.org/10.17244/eku.691760
  2. Burgoon, J. N., Heddle, M. L., & Duran, E. (2010). Re-examining the similarities between teacher and student conceptions about physical science. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 21(7), 859–872. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-010-9196-x
  3. Butler, J., Mooney Simmie, G., & O’Grady, A. (2015). An investigation into the prevalence of ecological misconceptions in upper secondary students and implications for preservice teacher education. European Journal of Teacher Education, 38(3), 300–319. https://doi:10.1080/02619768.2014.943394
  4. Creswell, J.W. (2007). Qualitative ınquiry and research design: choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE. Edmunds, H. (2000). The Focus Group Research Handbook. New York: McGraw-Hill. Glesne, C. (2013). Nitel araştırmaya giriş (2. Baskı). Ersoy, A., & Yalçınoğlu, P. (Edt.). Ankara:
  5. Anı Yayıncılık. Gündüz, E. Yılmaz, M., & Çimen, O. (2016). The Investigation of the 10th year biology text book of national education ministry (MEB) as regards to scientific concept. Bayburt Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 11(2), 414 – 430. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/befdergi/issue/28762/307851
  6. Gündüz, E., Yılmaz, M., Çimen, O., & Karakaya, F. (2019). Examining of subjects in 11th grade biology textbook in terms of scientific content. Bolu Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 19(3), 999-1015. https://doi.org/10.17240/aibuefd.2019.19.49440-559869
  7. Hogan, K. (2000). Assessing students' systems reasoning in ecology. Journal of Biological Education 35(1), 22-28. Doi:10.1080/00219266.2000.9655731 Johnson, B., & Činčera, J. (2019). Development of the ecological concepts of energy flow and materials cycling in middle school students participating in earth education programs. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 63, 94-101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2019.08.003
  8. Kabapınar F. (2007). Öğrencilerin kimyasal bağ konusundaki kavram yanılgılarına ilişkin literatüre bir bakış I: molekül içi bağlar. Mili Eğitim Dergisi, 176, 18–35.
  9. Karakaya, F., Yılmaz M., Çimen, O., & Adıgüzel, M. (2020a). Identifying and correcting pre-service teachers' misconceptions about parthenogenesis. Başkent University Journal of Education (BUJE), 7(1), 81-91. http://buje.baskent.edu.tr/index.php/buje/article/view/236
  10. Karakaya, F., Yılmaz, M., Çim