Journals / International Journal of Environment and Geoinformatics / 2020 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 1

A Method to Enhance Homogeneous Distribution of Matched Features for Image Matching

Pages
102–107
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The effectiveness and feasibility of our method is demonstrated with experiments on images acquired from a drone camera during flight.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Features are distinctive landmarks of an image.
📊
Key Findings & Data:After successfully matching an image pair, spatially close feature points go through an elimination process which aims to decrease ambiguity at the second matching step.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The effectiveness and feasibility of our method is demonstrated with experiments on images acquired from a drone camera during flight.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:: Feature · Homogeneity · Feature Matching

Abstract

Features are distinctive landmarks of an image. There are various feature detection and description algorithms. Many computer vision algorithms require matching of features from two images. Large number of correct matches with homogeneous distribution in the images is needed for robustness of the image matching. The matches are generally obtained using a feature distance threshold and ambiguous matches are rejected using a ratio test. This paper proposes a method that can be added to image matching pipeline for enhancing homogeneous distribution and increasing the number of matched feature points. After successfully matching an image pair, spatially close feature points go through an elimination process which aims to decrease ambiguity at the second matching step. Then, a coarse geometric transformation between two images is calculated, through which the detected feature points in one image (i.e. the moving image) are projected to the other image (i.e. the fixed image). Then, feature points from the moving image are matched to neighboring feature points of the fixed image within a pre-determined spatial distance. This narrows down the possible candidates and enables less correct matches being rejected because of the ratio test. The effectiveness and feasibility of our method is demonstrated with experiments on images acquired from a drone camera during flight.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÜLMEZ, B., DEMİRTAŞ, F., YILDIRIM, İ., LELOĞLU, U. M., YAMAN, M., GÜNEYİ, E. T. (2022). A Method to Enhance Homogeneous Distribution of Matched Features for Image Matching. International Journal of Environment and Geoinformatics, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 1, 102–107. https://ajindex.com/articles/540969

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Alcantarilla, P., Bartoli, A., Davison, A. (2012). KAZE features. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 7577 LNCS, 214-227.
  2. Bansal, P., Ardell, A. (1972). Average nearest-neighbor distances between uniformly distributed finite particles. Metallography, 5(2), 97-111.
  3. Baumberg, A. (2000). Reliable feature matching across widely separated views. Proceedings IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. CVPR 2000 (Cat. No.PR00662). 1, pp. 774-781.
  4. IEEE Comput. Soc. Bay, H., Ess, A., Tuytelaars, T., Van Gool, L. (2008). Speeded-Up Robust Features (SURF). Computer Vision and Image Understanding, 110(3), 346-359.
  5. Bayırhan, İ., Gazioğlu, C. (2019). Use of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAV) And Marine Environment Simulator in Oil Pollution Investigations, Investigations, International Symposium on Applied Geoinformatics (ISAG-2019), 1-6
  6. Brox, T., Malik, J. (2011). Large Displacement Optical Flow: Descriptor Matching in Variational Motion Estimation. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 33(3), 500-513.
  7. Canclini, A., Cesana, M., Redondi, A., Tagliasacchi, M., Ascenso, J., Cilla, R. (2013). Evaluation of low-complexity visual feature detectors and descriptors. 2013 18th International Conference on Digital Signal Processing (DSP) (pp. 1-7).
  8. IEEE. Cheng, G., Han, J. (2016). A survey on object detection in optical remote sensing images. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 117, 11-28.
  9. Deriche, R., Zhang, Z., Luong, Q.-T., Faugeras, O. (1994). Robust recovery of the epipolar geometry for an uncalibrated stereo rig. In R. Deriche, Z. Zhang, Q.-T. Luong, & O. Faugeras. Doucette, P., Antonisse, J., Braun, A., Lenihan, M., Brennan, M. (2013). Image georegistration methods: A framework for application guidelines. Proceedings - Applied Imagery Pattern Recognition Workshop. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc. Ghosh, D., Kaabouch, N. (2016). A survey on image mosaicing techniques. Journal of Visual Communication and Image Representation, 34, 1-11.
  10. Goshtasby, A. (1986). Piecewise linear mapping functions for image registration. Pattern Recognition, 19(6), 459-466.
  11. Goshtasby, A. (1988). Image registration by local approximation methods. Image and Vision Computing, 6(4), 255-261.
  12. Li, Y., Wang, S., Tian, Q., Ding, X. (2015). A survey of recent advances in visual feature detection. Neurocomputing, 149(PB), 736-751. Lowe,