SavedAdd your journal

Journals / International Journal of Environment and Geoinformatics / 2021 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 1

On the Use of Mathematical Models for Wastewater Treatment: A Reviewand Analysis of Activated Sludge Models ASM1 and ASM3

Başak SAVUN HEKİMOĞLU
Pages
1–18
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In the third part of the study, experiments with ASM1 and ASM3 models are conducted in MATLAB and a basic sensitivity analysis is applied for the parameters of the two models.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Mathematical models describing the dynamics of key biochemical processes in conventional activated sludge processes are commonly used to design and operate wastewater treatment plants.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Since the introduction of the first activated sludge model, namely Activated Sludge Model No. 1 (ASM1), in 1987 by the International Water Association, ASM models received considerable attention and several extensions were suggested.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In the third part of the study, experiments with ASM1 and ASM3 models are conducted in MATLAB and a basic sensitivity analysis is applied for the parameters of the two models.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Mathematical models describing the dynamics of key biochemical processes in conventional activated sludge processes are commonly used to design and operate wastewater treatment plants. Since the introduction of the first activated sludge model, namely Activated Sludge Model No. 1 (ASM1), in 1987 by the International Water Association, ASM models received considerable attention and several extensions were suggested. In this study, we briefly review the literature on two important activated sludge models, ASM1 and ASM3. Our literature review indicates that despite the presence of many articles on ASM there is no study on the parameter sensitivity of these differential equation models. In the second part of the study, these two models are simulated inMATLAB with different initial values and parameter combinations to develop further insight into the model structures. In the third part of the study, experiments with ASM1 and ASM3 models are conducted in MATLAB and a basic sensitivity analysis is applied for the parameters of the two models.

🔖

Cite This Article

HEKİMOĞLU, B. S. (2022). On the Use of Mathematical Models for Wastewater Treatment: A Reviewand Analysis of Activated Sludge Models ASM1 and ASM3. International Journal of Environment and Geoinformatics, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 1, 1–18. https://ajindex.com/articles/540943

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (7)

  1. Brdjanovic, D., Meijer, S. C., Lopez-Vazquez, C. M., Hooijmans, C. M., van Loosdrecht, M. C. (Eds.). (2015). Applicati ons of activated sludge models. Iwa Publishing. Brun, R., Kühni, M., Siegrist, H., Gujer, W., Reichert, P. (2002). Practical identifiability of ASM2d parameters—systematic selection and tuning of parameter subsets. Water research, 36(16), 4113- 4127. Choubert, J. M., Stricker, A. E., Marquot, A., Racault, Y., Gillot, S., Héduit, A. (2009). Updated Activated Sludge Model n° 1 Parameter Values for Improved Prediction of Nitrogen Removal in Activated Sludge Processes: Validation at 13 Full‐ scale Plants. Water Environment Research, 81(9), 858-865.
  2. Copp, J. B., Spanjers, H., Vanrolleghem, P. A. (Eds.). (2002). Respirometry in control of the activated sludge process: benchmarking control strategies (No. 11). IWA publishing. Draper, N. R., Smith, H. (1998). Applied regression analysis (Vol. 326). John Wiley & Sons. Drewnowski, J., Szeląg, B., Xie, L., Lu, X., Ganesapillai, M., Deb, C. K., Łagód, G. (2020). The Influence of COD Fraction Forms and Molecules Size on Hydrolysis Process Developed by Comparative OUR Studies in Activated Sludge Modelling. Molecules, 25(4), 929. Gernaey, K. V., van Loosdrecht, M. C., Henze, M., Lind, M., Jørgensen, S. B. (2004). Activated sludge wastewater treatment plant modelling and simulation: state of the art. Environmental Modelling & Software, 19(9), 763-783.
  3. Ghorbani, M., Eskicioglu, C. (2011). Application of the International Water Association activated sludge models to describe aerobic sludge digestion. Environmental technology, 32(16), 1923-1938.
  4. Gujer, W. (2008). Transformation Processes. Systems Analysis for Water Technology, 77-100.
  5. Guisasola, A., Sin, G., Baeza, J. A., Carrera, J., Vanrolleghem, P. A. (2005). Limitations of ASM1 and ASM3: a comparison based on batch oxygen uptake rate profiles from different full-scale wastewater treatment plants. Water Science and Technology, 52(10-11), 69-77.
  6. Hauduc, H., Rieger, L., Oehmen, A., Van Loosdrecht, M. C. M., Comeau, Y., Héduit, A. Gillot, S. (2013). Critical review of activated sludge modeling: state of process knowledge, modeling concepts, and limitations. Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 110(1), 24-46.
  7. Hauduc, H., Rieger, L., Oehmen, A., Van Loosdrecht, M. C. M., Comeau, Y., Héduit, A., Gillot, S. (2013).Critical review of activated sludge modeling: state of process knowledge, modeling concepts, and limitations. Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 110(1), 2