Journals / International Journal of Environment and Geoinformatics / 2021 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 2

Calculation of Aircraft Emissions During Landing and Take-Off (LTO) Cycles at Batumi International Airport, Georgia

Pages
186–192
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

To predict future emissions, it was evaluated that a 50% increase in LTO cycles would result in an increase of approximately 55-60% in emissions.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this paper, aircraft emissions (nitrogen oxides, carbon monoxide, and hydrocarbons) were estimated during landing and take-off (LTO) cycles for the year 2018 at Batumi International Airport in Georgia.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The total aircraft emissions during the LTO cycle were assessed as 68.96 t/y (39.78 t/y for NOx, 25.92 t/y for CO, and 3.26 t/y for HC) at Batumi international airport.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:To predict future emissions, it was evaluated that a 50% increase in LTO cycles would result in an increase of approximately 55-60% in emissions.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2018 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Aircraft emissions · Airport · Air Quality

Abstract

In this paper, aircraft emissions (nitrogen oxides, carbon monoxide, and hydrocarbons) were estimated during landing and take-off (LTO) cycles for the year 2018 at Batumi International Airport in Georgia. The calculation model is based on flight data recorded by TAV Airports Holding Corporations in Georgia, including type and number of aircraft, engine type, number of passengers, and emission factors from the International Civil Aviation Organization Engine Exhaust Emission Databank were used for estimating the emissions. The total aircraft emissions during the LTO cycle were assessed as 68.96 t/y (39.78 t/y for NOx, 25.92 t/y for CO, and 3.26 t/y for HC) at Batumi international airport. Domestic flights were accountable for 68% of the total LTO emissions in 2018. The findings displayed that NOx was mainly released during the take-off and climb-out modes, accounting for 27% and 37% of the total emissions. CO and HC emissions were released mostly in taxi mode and responsible for 77% and 70% of total emissions. The assessment demonstrates that a 2-minute reduction in taxi mode results in an approximate 6% reduction in LTO emissions. To predict future emissions, it was evaluated that a 50% increase in LTO cycles would result in an increase of approximately 55-60% in emissions.

🔖

Cite This Article

TOKUŞLU, A. (2022). Calculation of Aircraft Emissions During Landing and Take-Off (LTO) Cycles at Batumi International Airport, Georgia. International Journal of Environment and Geoinformatics, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 2, 186–192. https://ajindex.com/articles/540930

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Barrett, S.R.H., Britter, R.E., Waitz, I.A. (2010). Global mortality attributable to aircraft cruise emissions. Environmental Science and Technology, 44 (19). 7736-7742. https://doi.org/10.1021/es101325r
  2. Bayırhan, I., Mersin, K., Tokuslu, A., Gazioglu, C. (2019). Modelling of Ship Originated Exhaust Gas Emissions in the Istanbul Strait. International Journal of Environment and Geoinformatics (IJEGEO), 6(3): 238-243. DOI:10.30897/ijegeo.641397 Bo, X., Xue, X., Xu, J., Du, X., Zhou, B., Tang, L. (2019). Aviation's emissions and contribution to the air quality in China. Atmospheric Environment, 201 (2019) 121–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.01.005.
  3. Elbir, T. (2008). Estimation of engine emissions from commercial aircraft at a midsized Turkish airport. J. Environ. Eng., 134, 210-215. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(2008)134:3(210) Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). (2005). Regulatory Announcement No. EPA420-F-05–015, Office of Transportation and Air Quality. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). (2016). Aerospace Forecast. Fiscal Year 2016-2036 Georgian Civil Aviation Agency (GCAA). (2019). Flight schedule, statistics. http://gcaa.ge/eng/regular.php
  4. Hudda, N., Fruin, S.A. (2016). International airport impacts to air quality: size and related properties of large increases in ultrafine particle number concentrations. Environ. Sci. Technol., 50 (7), 3362–3370. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b05313 International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO). (2011). Airport Air Quality Manual. International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO). (2016a). Air Navigation Report. International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO). (2016b). Aircraft Engine Emissions Databank. Kalivoda, M.T., Kudrna, M. (1997). Methodologies for estimating emissions from air traffic: future emissions. Cost 319 Action, report no. MEET Project ST-96-SC.204, Vienna, Austria; 1997,
  5. Perchtoldsdorf-Vienna. Krzyzanowski, M., Cohen, A. (2008). Update of WHO air quality guidelines. Air Quality, Atmosphere, and Health (1), 7-13. DOI: 10.1007/s11869-008-0008-9
  6. Penner, J.E., Lister, D.H., Griggs, D.J., Dokken, D.J., McFarland, M. (2010). Aviation and the Global Atmosphere. A Special Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press,
  7. Cambridge. Perl, A., Patterson, J., Perez, M. (1997). Pricing aircraft emissions at Lyon-Satolas airport. Transport Res Part D., 1997;2(2):89–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1361-9209(97)00005-9
  8. Pope, C.A., Dockery, D.W. (201