Journals / International Journal of Environmental and Science Education (elektronik) / 2009 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 3

The meaning of scientific literacy

Pages
275–288
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Relevance from both perspectives is very much geared to the view that scientific literacy is best taught by seeing science education as ‘education through science’ as opposed to ‘science through education.’

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This paper sets out to provide an overview of scientific literacy specifically related to whether emphasis is placed on the ‘science’ or the ‘literacy’ aspect, accepting that literacy, wherever used, is wider than simply reading and writing.
📊
Key Findings & Data:It does this from a general rather than a country perspective.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Relevance from both perspectives is very much geared to the view that scientific literacy is best taught by seeing science education as ‘education through science’ as opposed to ‘science through education.’
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This paper sets out to provide an overview of scientific literacy specifically related to whether emphasis is placed on the ‘science’ or the ‘literacy’ aspect, accepting that literacy, wherever used, is wider than simply reading and writing. It does this from a general rather than a country perspective. The emphasis in giving meaning to scientific literacy is placed on the literacy component in recognition of the trend towards relating scientific literacy to skills and values appropriate for a responsible citizen. Rejected is a consideration that scientific literacy is related to an emphasis on the acquisition of content and this is especially considered, noting the social bias and cultural embedding of science. The emphasis on enhancing scientific literacy is placed on an appreciation of the nature of science, the development of personal attributes and the acquisition of socioscientific skills and values. Furthermore, in teaching towards this view of scientific literacy, a key component is seen as relevance and a model of relevance for science teaching is put forward based on relevance being seen from two perspectives. Relevance from both perspectives is very much geared to the view that scientific literacy is best taught by seeing science education as ‘education through science’ as opposed to ‘science through education.’

🔖

Cite This Article

RANNIKMAE, M., HOLBROOK, J. (2022). The meaning of scientific literacy. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education (elektronik), Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 3, 275–288. https://ajindex.com/articles/540896

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1989). Science for all Americans: A project 2061 report on literacy goals in science, mathematics and technology, Washington, DC: AAAS. American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1993). Benchmarks for scientific literacy. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  2. Baumert, J. (1997). Scientific literacy: A German perspective. In W.Graeber & C. Bolte (Eds.), Scientific literacy. An international symposium (p. 167-180). Institut für die Pädagogik der Naturwissenschaften (IPN): Kiel, Germany. Bell, R., & Lederman, N. (2003). Understandings of the nature of science and decision making on science and technology based issues. Science Education, 87, 352-377.
  3. Bybee R.W. (1997). Towards an understanding of scientific literacy. In: W. Gräber & C. Bolte. (Eds.). Scientific literacy. An international symposium (p. 37-68). Institut für die Pädagogik der Naturwissenschaften (IPN): Kiel, Germany. El-Khalick, F., & Lederman, N. (2000). Improving science teachers’ conceptions of nature of science: a critical review of the literature. International Journal of Science Education, 22(7), 665-701.
  4. Fensham, P. (2008). Science education policy-making. Paris: UNESCO. Gallagher, J., & Harsch, G. (1997). Scientific literacy: Science education and secondary school students. In W.Graeber & C. Bolte. (Eds.). Scientific literacy: An international symposium (p. 13- 34). Institut für die Pädagogik der Naturwissenschaften (IPN): Kiel, Germany. Gräber, W., Erdmann, T., & Schlieker, V. (2001). ParCIS: Partnership between Chemical Industry and Schools. Accessed November 2008 from http://www.ipn.uni-kiel.de/_chik_symposium /sites/pdf/graeber.pdf Hand, B. (1999). A writing in science framework designed to enhance science literacy. International Journal of Science Education, 21(10), 1021-1035.
  5. Holbrook, J., (2008). Introduction to the Special Issue of Science Education International Devoted to PARSEL, Science Education International, 19(3), 257-266.
  6. Holbrook J. (1998). Operationalising scientific and technological literacy: A new approach to science teaching. Science Education International, 9(2), 15-19.
  7. Holbrook, J., & Rannikmae, M. (2007). Nature of science education for enhancing scientific literacy. International Journal of Science Education, 29(11), 1347-1362.
  8. Holbrook, J., & Rannikmae, M. (Eds.). (1997). Supplementary teaching materials promoting scientific and technological literacy. Tartu, Estonia: ICASE (International Council of