Journals / International Journal of Environmental and Science Education (elektronik) / 2009 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 1

The effect of type of instruction on expression of children's knowledge: How do children see the Endocrine and urinary system?

Pages
75–93
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Special instructions are better for eliciting a deeper understanding of children knowledge about human anatomy.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Children’s knowledge about human anatomy can be examined through several different ways.
📊
Key Findings & Data:We examined relationships between these two types of instructions using drawings of the urinary and endocrine systems as the examples with pupils aged 10-14 years.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Special instructions are better for eliciting a deeper understanding of children knowledge about human anatomy.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Children’s knowledge about human anatomy can be examined through several different ways. Making a drawing of the internal features of the human body has been frequently used in recent studies. However, there might be a serious difference in results obtained from a general instruction to students (What you think is inside your body) and specific (e.g. Draw bones that are inside your body) instruction. We examined relationships between these two types of instructions using drawings of the urinary and endocrine systems as the examples with pupils aged 10-14 years. An ANCOVA showed significant relationships between general and special instruction, but further comparison showed significant correlation only for urinary system. The level of students’ drawings significantly increases with previous knowledge about human anatomy and age. These findings suggest that relationships between two types of instructions strongly depend on the complexity of the organ system that children draw as well as their previous knowledge. We propose that drawings from general instructions are therefore appropriate especially for comparative studies. Special instructions are better for eliciting a deeper understanding of children knowledge about human anatomy.

🔖

Cite This Article

FRANCOVICOVA, J., TUNNICLIFFE, S. D., PROKOP, P. (2022). The effect of type of instruction on expression of children's knowledge: How do children see the Endocrine and urinary system?. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education (elektronik), Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 1, 75–93. https://ajindex.com/articles/540893

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Backett – Milburn K and McKie L (1999) A critical appraisal of the draw and write technique. Health Education Research, 14, 387 – 398. Caravita S and Tonucci F (1987) How children know biological structure – function relationships. Paper presented at the Second International Seminar: Misconceptions and Educational Strategies in Science and Mathematics, 26 – 29 July (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University). Duit R and Glynn S (1996) Mental modelling. In: Research in Science Education in Europe, ed. Welford, G., Osborne, I., Scott, P. London: Falmer. Gellert E (1962) Children’s conceptions on the content and functions of the human body. Genetic Psychology Monograps, 65, 293 – 405. Johnson C N and Wellman H M (1982) Children’s developing conceptions of the mind and brain. Child Development, 53, 222 – 234. Khwaja, C C and Saxton J (2001) It all depends on the question you ask. Primary Science Review, 68, 13 – 14. Mintzes J J (1984) Naïve theories in biology: Children’s conceptions of the human body. School Science and Mathematics, 84: 548 – 555. Reiss M J and Tunnicliffe S D (1999) Children’s knowledge of the human skeleton. Primary Science Review, 60, 7 – 10. Reiss M J and Tunnicliffe S D (2001) Students’ understandings of human organs and organ systems. Research in Science Education, 31, 383 – 399. Reiss M J, Tunnicliffe S D, Andersen A M, Bartoszeck A, Carvalho G S, Chen S Y, Jarman R, Jónsson S, Manokore V, Marchenko N, Mulemwa J, Novikova T, Otuka J, Teppa S, Rooy W V (2002) An international study of young peoples’ drawings of what is inside themselves. Journal of Biological Education, 36, 58 – 64. Teixeira F M (2000) What happens to the food we eat? Children’s conceptions of the structure and function of the digestive system. International Journal of Science Education, 22, 507 – 520. Tunnicliffe S D (2004) Where does the drink go? Primary Science Review, 85, 8–10. Tunnicliffe S D and Reiss M J (1999a) Students’ understanding about animal skeletons. International Journal of Science Education, 21, 1187 – 1200. Tunnicliffe S D and Reiss M J (1999b) Learning about skeletons and other organ systems of vertebrate animals. Science Education International, 10, 29 – 33. White R T and Gunstone R F (1994) Probing understanding. London: Falmer Press.