Journals / Maden Tetkik ve Arama Dergisi / 2011 / Cilt: 142 - Sayı: 142

HISTORICAL EVOLUTION OF THE GEOLOGICAL RESEARCHES IN THE MENDERES MASSIF

Pages
1–23
Publication Date
2011-11-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Pliocene to recent active graben faults intersect the detachment faults.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:- The Pan-African basement of Menderes Massif is made up of homogenous paragneiss and schist units (metaclastic sequence) which are intruded by metagabbros and gneisses derived from different types of granites.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The basement is unconformably overlain by lower Palaeozoic metaclastic series consisting of quartzite and metaconglomerate at the lowest level.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Pliocene to recent active graben faults intersect the detachment faults.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Menderes Massif · Pan-African and Alpine metamorphism · young exhumation

Abstract

- The Pan-African basement of Menderes Massif is made up of homogenous paragneiss and schist units (metaclastic sequence) which are intruded by metagabbros and gneisses derived from different types of granites. The basement is unconformably overlain by lower Palaeozoic metaclastic series consisting of quartzite and metaconglomerate at the lowest level. They show a transition into schists, and the Palaeozoic sequence ends with Permo-Carboniferous black marbles of Göktepe formation. Both basement and Palaeozoic sequence are intruded by lower Triassic leucocratic granites which were converted into orthogneisses by Alpine metamorphism. The Mesozoic series of the Menderes Massif begins with upper Triassic meta-sandstone/metaconglomerate intercalation and continues with Jurassic to Cretaceous dolomites and massive marbles. Platform-type massive marbles with metabauxite lenses and well-preserved rudist fossils at the uppermost levels are conformably overlain by late Campanian - late Maastrichtian reddish pelagic marbles. Flysch-type middle Paleocene metaolistostrome forms the uppermost unit of cover series. The protoliths of clastic sediments of the Pan-African basement consisting of paragneiss and conformably overlying schist units were deposited on a passive continental margin. The zircon ages of the granitoids intersecting this clastic sequence are restricted to a time range between 570 and 520 Ma with an average of about 550 Ma. The polyphase metamorphic evolution of the basement under granulite (583 ± 5,7 Ma), eclogite (529,9 ± 22 Ma) and Barrowian-type medium-pressure conditions (average 540 Ma) are related with the Pan-African Orogeny. The isotopic data including the ages of detrital zircons (592-3229 Ma) of paragneiss and schist units, the intrusion ages of granitoids and the age of granulite facies metamorphism constrain an age for the deposition of protoliths of metaclastic sequence between 592-580 Ma, Lower Late Neoproterozoic. In Eocene time, Pan-African basement and cover series were affected by Barrowiantype Alpine metamorphism under greenschist, lower amphibolite facies conditions, traditionally called as the 'Main Menderes Metamorphism. However, new HP/LT evidence found in Mesozoic cover series reveals that this metamorphism is more complex than it was considered. It is generally accepted by many researchers that the exhumation of the Menderes Massif as a core complex is related with the extensional tectonic regime. It is assumed that there is a genetic relation between the intrusion of Eðrigöz - Koyunoba granites and the detachment fault in the northern part of the Menderes Massif. Furthermore; to the South of the Massif, it is suggested that the old thrust fault between the Menderes Massif and Lycian Nappes reworked as a detachment fault during the exhumation. The reason of extension in the region is the thermal weakness in the thickened crust made by the magmatism developed after the the collusion of Anatolide-Tauride platforms and the Sakarya continent. The intrusion ages of Eðrigöz and Koyunoba granitoids are 20-21 Ma and the detachment fault was active during 25- 19 Ma. In addition, the symmetric core complex formation in the central submassif was carried out in the middlelate Miocene. Pliocene to recent active graben faults intersect the detachment faults.

🔖

Cite This Article

DORA, O. Ö. (2011). HISTORICAL EVOLUTION OF THE GEOLOGICAL RESEARCHES IN THE MENDERES MASSIF. Maden Tetkik ve Arama Dergisi, Cilt: 142 - Sayı: 142, 1–23. https://ajindex.com/articles/54089

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (5)

  1. Akkök, R., 1983. Structural and metamorphic evolution of the northern part of the Menderes Massif. New data from Derbent area and their implications fort he tectonics of the massif. Journay Geology, 91, pp.342-350
  2. Ashworth, J. R. and Evirgen, M., 1984. Mineral chemistry of regional chloritoid assemblages in the Chlorite Zone, Lycian Nappes, south-west Turkey, Mineralogical Magazine, 48, pp. 159- 165. Bozkurt, E., 2001. Late Alpin evolution of the central Menderes Massif, western Turkey. International Journal Earth Science, 89, pp.728-744.,2004. Granitoid rocks of the southern Menderes Massif: field evidence for Tertiary magmatism in an extensional shear zone. International Journal of Earth Science, 93, 52-71.
  3. Bozkurt, E., Park, R.G. and Winchester, J.A., 1993. Evidence against the core/cover interpretation of the southern sector of the Menderes Massif, west Turkey. Terra Nova 5, pp.445-451. and, 1994. Southern Menderes Massif: an incipient metamorphic core complex in Western Anatolia, Turkey. Journal Geological Society London, 151, pp.213-216. and, 1997. Evolution of a mid-tertiary extensional shear zone in the southern Menderes Massif, western Turkey. Bulletin Society Geological France, 168,1, pp.2-14. and, 1999. The structure of the Paleozoic schists in the Southern Menderes Massif, western Turkey: a new approach to the origin of the main Menderes Metamorphism and its relation to the Lycian Nappes. Geodinamica Acta 12, pp.25-42.
  4. Bozkurt, E. and Satýr, M., 2000. The southern Menderes Massif (western Turkey): geochronology and exhumation history. Geology Journay., 35, pp.285-296.,Winchester, A. J., Mittwede, S. and Ottley, C., 2006. Geochemistry and tectonic implications of leucogranites and tourmalines of the southern Menderes Massif, southwest Turkey. Geodin. Acta, 19/5, pp.363-390.
  5. Brinkmann, R., 1967. Die Südflanke des MenderesMassivs bei Milas, Bodrum und Ören, Scient. Represantive Faculty Science, Ege University., Izmir, Turkey. Candan, O., Dora, O.Ö., Kun, N., Akal, C. and Koralay, E., 1992. Aydýn Daðlarý (Menderes Masifi) güney kesimindeki allokton metamorfik birimler. Türkiye Petrol Jeologlarý Derneði (TPJD) Bülteni, C4/1, pp.93-110.,, Dürr, St., and Oberhänsli, R., 1994. Erster Nachweis von Granulit und Eklogit - Relikten im Menderes - Massif / Türkei. Göttingen Abr. Geol. Paläont. Sb.1 5. Symposium TSK, pp.217-220. and, 1998. Menderes Masifinin genelleþtirilmiþ jeoloji haritasý. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Jeoloji Mühendisliði Bölümü Bornov